2004 MSA Population Estimates
#21
Posted 21 April 2005 - 10:00 AM
#22
Posted 21 April 2005 - 12:45 PM
I googled and googled and even vivisimoed this stuff and nothing. The most I could find on Census.gov is the old MSA data with 2000's numbers?!?
#23
Posted 21 April 2005 - 01:25 PM
PghUSA, on Apr 21 2005, 01:45 PM, said:
I googled and googled and even vivisimoed this stuff and nothing. The most I could find on Census.gov is the old MSA data with 2000's numbers?!?
I think I already did
teshadoh, on Apr 15 2005, 11:41 AM, said:
#24
Posted 21 April 2005 - 01:26 PM
#25
Posted 21 April 2005 - 01:31 PM
RiversideGator, on Apr 21 2005, 02:26 PM, said:
Ok - a very general explanation - for a more detailed one you should consult OMB or Census: MSA's are primarily determined by commuting, I believe it is 15% to the primary city urban area (UA), which piggybacks to exurban counties that commute to non-UA counties I believe. CSA (consolidated) is perhaps a more abstract definition of what the 'greater metro' is - San Francisco / San Jose, etc. But it also takes into account counties outside of the MSA that exhibit commuting or growth trends that appear to be directed towards the MSA. Also it includes counties whose own UA are adjacent to the primary city UA (Atlanta & GAinesville GA).
Hope that helps some...
#26
Posted 21 April 2005 - 03:12 PM
#27
Posted 23 April 2005 - 11:10 AM
#28
Posted 23 April 2005 - 12:22 PM
#29
Posted 25 April 2005 - 09:31 AM
I'm sure there's many areas in many msa's and csa's that seem dubious on the suface, but I'll take their word for it. If you want to fault anything fault the use of counties as measuring stick. Clearly Boca Raton and the rest of South Florida is much more linked than it it is with West Palm Beach, but that's one big county, so it's all included.
If you prefer use Urban Areas. I think you'll find Miami ranks near the same.
#30
Posted 27 April 2005 - 06:34 PM
Edited by paulblackgsx, 27 April 2005 - 06:36 PM.
#31
Posted 28 April 2005 - 07:40 AM
Brickell, on Apr 25 2005, 09:31 AM, said:
Actually, using UA's, the Miami area ranks even better than its MSA ranking. Nearly the entire metro is included in the UA, which is very rare. That means that, unlike most metros, there is no dead space between areas of development, which is a very good thing. This means that Miami's metro is far more connected than nearly every other metro in the country.
The Palm Beach/Miami metro argument is becoming a very common one, but as others have said, its very clear that all of South Florida acts as one metro area. Palm Beach County may not have much in common with Dade, but the interaction with Broward is huge. In the future, I'd actually look to the metro "daisy-chaining" even further north, with each new county relying only on the county directly to the south, rather than far southern Dade county.
#32
Posted 17 September 2005 - 11:46 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














