Worcester City Square Rebuilding Worcester Downtown
#62
Posted 08 January 2006 - 07:21 PM
#63
Posted 19 March 2006 - 10:12 AM
Negotiations between the city and the developer are ongoing in a very slow pace. It seems like there are some issues they cannot agree on. I guess it is unlikely that construction is starting anytime soon.
Worcester "A city on the move" is moving in snail pace.
#64
Posted 19 March 2006 - 05:51 PM
#65
Posted 01 May 2006 - 12:14 PM
Worcester Telegram, April 26:
“WORCESTER— It took longer than originally hoped, but the city has finally reached agreement with the developer of the $563 million CitySquare redevelopment project… CitySquare, the largest public-private redevelopment outside the Boston-Cambridge area in the state’s history, involves razing portions of the 20.2-acre former Worcester Common Outlets mall property and replacing it with a mixed-use district with retail, housing, office and entertainment space components. It also calls for extending Front Street to Washington Square. ...Mr. Park said it is anticipated that demolition of the now vacant mall and construction of new buildings will begin toward the end of this year. He said the project timetable will be spelled out in the development agreement.”
I can’t wait to see the wrecking ball!
#66
Posted 26 October 2006 - 08:54 PM
http://www.newcitysq...obe_10_1_06.pdf
The deal has been signed by the city and developer (Worcester Telegram 10/27/06):
http://www.telegram..../610270656/1116
This post has been edited by oliver: 27 October 2006 - 08:10 AM
#67
Posted 13 February 2008 - 03:10 PM
oliver, on Oct 26 2006, 09:54 PM, said:
http://www.newcitysq...obe_10_1_06.pdf
The deal has been signed by the city and developer (Worcester Telegram 10/27/06):
http://www.telegram..../610270656/1116
So is this project actually happening?
I hate worcester and only stop there because a friend is getting her masters there, but would definately be more inclined to explore more if this gets built.
She has moved so I have not driven directly into downtown for about a year now. anyone know?
I did notice massive construction on a Umass Med school building.
#68
Posted 13 February 2008 - 03:32 PM
Personally, I don't think that is going to be any more of a benefit. It wont' draw more investors, and will end up looking worse and creating more problems with rodents and such. The only benefit I can find in it is that it might just say to people the project isn't going to work and try for something new.
#69
Posted 13 February 2008 - 03:51 PM
cloudship, on Feb 13 2008, 04:32 PM, said:
Personally, I don't think that is going to be any more of a benefit. It wont' draw more investors, and will end up looking worse and creating more problems with rodents and such. The only benefit I can find in it is that it might just say to people the project isn't going to work and try for something new.
It would be a shame if this did not happen. A project of that scale would completely change the core of Worcester, and that would generally be a good thing. I am hoping the continued use of Worcester as an extended bedroom community to Boston will keep this alive long enough to survive this credit crisis. I suppose progress can not be rushed. We see the same thing in Hartford.
#70
Posted 14 February 2008 - 06:08 PM
I hate to see it get torn down, then left barren. which I fear is most likely the case. It's not like it will be virgin ground you can simply pave over or build fresh on, you will have to consider the existing foundation and everything els e(including some spurs of the canal) which are down there. I'd rather see them do it right the first time.
#71
Posted 15 February 2008 - 08:22 PM
#72
Posted 15 February 2008 - 10:52 PM
#73
Posted 16 February 2008 - 11:42 AM
Then again, Shrewsbury Street and the rotary goes under the railroad bridge into W Cntr Blvd which goes to Main anyway.
#74
Posted 16 February 2008 - 03:54 PM
Lowerdeck, on Feb 16 2008, 12:42 PM, said:
Then again, Shrewsbury Street and the rotary goes under the railroad bridge into W Cntr Blvd which goes to Main anyway.
It can be a bit confusing with the curves. So I don't think you are going to get clear views. Now if there was a streetscape, which actually draws attention, I think that would be much better - it would lead the person to Main St. But an Empty lot I am not so sure would.
I have to admit I am very curious about the canal through that section. The actual canal runs under the very corner of the train station, and just west of the railroad track. However, off of the canal, many companies had their own little side canals. They found a few while constructing both the Galleria and the Centrum. It would be interesting to know what is under there and what could be done with it.
#75
Posted 16 February 2008 - 06:33 PM
cloudship, on Feb 16 2008, 04:54 PM, said:
I have to admit I am very curious about the canal through that section. The actual canal runs under the very corner of the train station, and just west of the railroad track. However, off of the canal, many companies had their own little side canals. They found a few while constructing both the Galleria and the Centrum. It would be interesting to know what is under there and what could be done with it.
I remember something about trying to get pieces of the canal back, put some sort of waterfront district around it. But wasn't that supposed to be nearish Kelley Square?
#76
Posted 16 February 2008 - 08:34 PM
This would take a bit of redoing, but I think it might be an idea to try and either unbury or recreate that section of canal. Move the road a little further to the west (maybe trim that corner) and use that as a feature area. I would examine if it would be possible to do something better with those tracks - make them more appealing, maybe a well designed viaduct or something that could tie in with Washington Square. Then use that whole area as a kind of square, and develop the periphery of it. If you put in an attractive feature - a grand fountain, perhaps, it might draw interest between the two towers to Worcester common.
#77
Posted 17 January 2009 - 11:28 AM
While on one hand, this company already has operations in Worcester... at least now something can be done with the Common Outlets. That is of course, if things go as planned.
http://www.telegram....N...&source=rss
#79
Posted 18 January 2009 - 11:19 AM
I would not be surprised, however, if the project itself takes on a whole different look. For that matter, I would not be surprised if Berkley simply gives up the whole thing to Unum, and Unum takes over the project.

Sign In
Register
Help




MultiQuote
