Air Rights
#1
Posted 20 February 2006 - 07:39 AM
#2
Posted 20 February 2006 - 08:45 AM
next, is the building on the corner of Martin and Wilmington. the N&O said that a company is tryin to purchase more space and the air rights to the parking structure to make way for a tower. is this the mystery tower, and is the design on the front page the actual design for the tower?
and finally i was reading somewhere that city leaders were trying to talk to the developers of the RBC HQ and their architects about the design of the building being too boxy and maybe pushing height. is this true?
#3
Posted 20 February 2006 - 11:18 AM
Quote
On what front page have you found the design that could possibly be the 'mystery tower'?
#4
Posted 20 February 2006 - 11:52 AM
#5
Posted 20 February 2006 - 12:35 PM
Edited by ChiefJoJo, 20 February 2006 - 12:36 PM.
#6
Posted 20 February 2006 - 02:15 PM
#7
Posted 20 February 2006 - 02:42 PM
Edited by Tayfromcarolina, 20 February 2006 - 02:43 PM.
#8
Posted 20 February 2006 - 03:22 PM
#10
Posted 21 February 2006 - 06:53 AM
Rufus, on Feb 20 2006, 09:45 AM, said:
next, is the building on the corner of Martin and Wilmington. the N&O said that a company is tryin to purchase more space and the air rights to the parking structure to make way for a tower. is this the mystery tower, and is the design on the front page the actual design for the tower?
and finally i was reading somewhere that city leaders were trying to talk to the developers of the RBC HQ and their architects about the design of the building being too boxy and maybe pushing height. is this true?
The more I look at the RBC rendering, ther more I think they ought to add a little height to it. Afterall, they want it to be prominent and adding some height to it will certainly do this. A less boxy design would be nicer.
#11
Posted 21 February 2006 - 11:04 AM
avery, on Feb 21 2006, 07:53 AM, said:
The more I look at the RBC rendering, ther more I think they ought to add a little height to it. Afterall, they want it to be prominent and adding some height to it will certainly do this. A less boxy design would be nicer.
I think the overall design is horrible. I wish they would come up with something higher and not a combination of the two progress energy buildings.
#12
Posted 21 February 2006 - 11:08 AM
pack-man, on Feb 21 2006, 12:04 PM, said:
#13
Posted 21 February 2006 - 11:40 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














