Jump to content



- - - - -

CONSTRUCTION THREAD: Magnolia Park Town Center


1361 replies to this topic

#1081 ct36

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 526 posts
  • Location:Asheville/Charleston

Posted 27 July 2009 - 07:29 PM

Biltmore Park Town Square is very nice. Yes, some of the stores are not open yet because construction is not finished. Nordstrom would work better at Haywood, but I am sure that Sears owns their building. Simon could get them to move to Woodruff or somewhere else. Bass Pro Shops usually do not reuse buildings. If they did reuse MW, it would only be 75,000 square feet because BPS stores are very tall in height. I think BPTS will be nicer than Magnolia unless Magnolia gets some very nice stores. But I do not see that happening. Its anchored by Costco, Sports Authority & Rooms to Go. Those are not 3 anchors to brag about. Sears at SouthPark owned? their building and it was gotten rid of. Fry's would be cool, but they are not really expanding much, I think they would do great in some markets such as Greenville, Charlotte, Nashville, Durham/Raleigh and others. However, they never have expanded much.

Edited by ct36, 27 July 2009 - 07:33 PM.


 

#1082 mallguy

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,072 posts

Posted 27 July 2009 - 07:40 PM

OK...if the Montgomery Ward building is being re-leased, and the strip of Greenville Mall between it and Sports Authority will be leased (that part of the mall was always pretty empty so I won't say re-leased), then what was the point of demolishing the mall?

Costco could have been built into the old JBWhite building, which was totally re-done in '95, and the Parisian building was pretty new, too; it was a nice mall building that was demolished really quickly. What a waste.

And what new big-box and in-line tenants are likely to locate in Greenville but are not already in town, anyway? These days, not many- Haywood + Greenridge = about 2,000,000 sf of retail that's already accounted for.

#1083 ct36

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 526 posts
  • Location:Asheville/Charleston

Posted 27 July 2009 - 08:36 PM

View Postmallguy, on Jul 27 2009, 09:40 PM, said:

OK...if the Montgomery Ward building is being re-leased, and the strip of Greenville Mall between it and Sports Authority will be leased (that part of the mall was always pretty empty so I won't say re-leased), then what was the point of demolishing the mall?

Costco could have been built into the old JBWhite building, which was totally re-done in '95, and the Parisian building was pretty new, too; it was a nice mall building that was demolished really quickly. What a waste.

And what new big-box and in-line tenants are likely to locate in Greenville but are not already in town, anyway? These days, not many- Haywood + Greenridge = about 2,000,000 sf of retail that's already accounted for.
Costco would not have been in JBWhite. Stores like Costco have a large height that department stores can not accomadate. Especially if two floors because they can only use one. Therefore, Costco would have been under 100,000 square feet.

#1084 citylife

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,401 posts
  • Location:Greenville, SC

Posted 06 October 2009 - 08:22 PM

Posted Image

#1085 Greenville

    City

  • Members+
  • 4,517 posts

Posted 06 October 2009 - 09:21 PM

This is just Rooms to Go, right? In other words, nothing to get excited about.

#1086 citylife

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,401 posts
  • Location:Greenville, SC

Posted 06 October 2009 - 09:28 PM

Correct. Nothing to get excited about at the present time.

#1087 distortedlogic

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,481 posts

Posted 07 October 2009 - 03:22 PM

Perhaps this is just a knee-jerk reaction but I really wish the city/county would adopt stricter ordinances for the these companies vacating big boxes and just letting them rot, only to move a mile or two away. The current Rooms to go, is a beautiful viable store and yet they will just let it sit there for who knows how long. I think these big box retailers (especially) should be held responsible for securing a new tennant for their building before they are allowed by the city/county to move, or make some provision to have the old building torn down or something. All these rotting stores makes me very frustrated. :wacko:

#1088 GvilleSC

    Metropolis

  • Members+
  • 6,852 posts
  • Location:Greenville

Posted 07 October 2009 - 04:14 PM

View Postdistortedlogic, on Oct 7 2009, 05:22 PM, said:

Perhaps this is just a knee-jerk reaction but I really wish the city/county would adopt stricter ordinances for the these companies vacating big boxes and just letting them rot, only to move a mile or two away. The current Rooms to go, is a beautiful viable store and yet they will just let it sit there for who knows how long. I think these big box retailers (especially) should be held responsible for securing a new tennant for their building before they are allowed by the city/county to move, or make some provision to have the old building torn down or something. All these rotting stores makes me very frustrated. :wacko:
I think it'll be interesting to see how the new Uptown designation and developments will affect the Rooms to Go site. In 10 years from now, they may very well wish that they had stayed.

#1089 btoy

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,264 posts
  • Location:Greer, SC

Posted 07 October 2009 - 07:06 PM

View PostGvilleSC, on Oct 7 2009, 05:14 PM, said:

I think it'll be interesting to see how the new Uptown designation and developments will affect the Rooms to Go site. In 10 years from now, they may very well wish that they had stayed.


It wasn't all about location, the new store is much larger. and maybe it won't be empty long, the Tweeter filled up pretty quickly.

#1090 breed

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 614 posts

Posted 08 October 2009 - 07:13 AM

View Postdistortedlogic, on Oct 7 2009, 04:22 PM, said:

Perhaps this is just a knee-jerk reaction but I really wish the city/county would adopt stricter ordinances for the these companies vacating big boxes and just letting them rot, only to move a mile or two away. The current Rooms to go, is a beautiful viable store and yet they will just let it sit there for who knows how long. I think these big box retailers (especially) should be held responsible for securing a new tennant for their building before they are allowed by the city/county to move, or make some provision to have the old building torn down or something. All these rotting stores makes me very frustrated. :wacko:

I understand the sentiment... but there are a couple things to keep in mind...

1. Very often, the users are simply tenants and do not own the building. That complicates trying to impose something like this.

2. These empty big boxes create awesome opportunities for local stores to get their foot in a strong location... ala Jeff Lynch or Palmetto Home & Garden.

3. There actually aren't that many available right now, as compared to a couple years ago.

***

However, some communities have done this. I can't think of any locally. Another tactic that local communities are looking is is adopting design standards that prevent a store from being developed in a way that is "branded". Which makes re-tenanting easier.

#1091 citylife

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,401 posts
  • Location:Greenville, SC

Posted 14 October 2009 - 08:58 PM

We're ready. The question is are you? http://www.greenvilleonline.com/article/20...1/YOURUPSTATE02 ;)

We are thrilled to be joining the 700,000 square foot campus and excited to be the exclusive Bowling and Family Entertainment Center for Magnolia Park. SUPERPLAY USA, a Bowling and Family Entertainment Center will offer an all encompassing entertainment and dining experience where guests can immerse themselves in a State-of-the-Art "family playground"; offering 34 lanes of private bowling, laser tag, an interactive game room, sports bar, martini bar, party rooms, and a billiards room.

:yahoo:

Edited by citylife, 14 October 2009 - 09:00 PM.


#1092 mallguy

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,072 posts

Posted 15 October 2009 - 04:39 AM

[EDITED TO ADD: This new addition should do very well.]

The Apple Store and other luxury retailers that were claimed to be joining this development are where?

I still can't get over the remaining parts mostly-demolished mall being re-leased, which I find entertaining, and no high-end stores here- so sad that Parisian and Harold's and the like are long-gone.

Edited by mallguy, 15 October 2009 - 06:29 AM.


#1093 swu_BA_student

    Whistle-Stop

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 254 posts
  • Location:West End

Posted 15 October 2009 - 06:12 AM

I'm glad some movement is happening on this because positive cash flow is the first step to the rest of the project happening, but this looks like a poor man's Frankie's judging by the website. Citylife, do you know if this will be one of the tennents in the old structures, or are they going to build new?

Side note, City, do you have citylife tatted on your stomach, Tupac style?

#1094 citylife

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,401 posts
  • Location:Greenville, SC

Posted 15 October 2009 - 06:40 AM

View Postmallguy, on Oct 15 2009, 06:39 AM, said:

[EDITED TO ADD: This new addition should do very well.]

The Apple Store and other luxury retailers that were claimed to be joining this development are where?

I still can't get over the remaining parts mostly-demolished mall being re-leased, which I find entertaining, and no high-end stores here- so sad that Parisian and Harold's and the like are long-gone.

Luxury retailers currently aren't expanding right now. In fact, a lot of them are closing stores. Apple is slated to go to Haywood Mall. Harold's filed for bankruptcy and closed all of their stores. I believe it will go in the former Montgomery Ward's building. I'll see if I can find out for sure. It kind of sounds like a knock-off Dave and Busters to me. We'll just have to wait and see how it turns out. At least we're finally seeing some movement and the entertainment section of the development come to life. If this entertainment center does go in the former Montgomery Ward building and they tear down the Sports Authority building than it could be located in the center of the future mixed-use development if they design it right. And no, my name is not tatted on my stomach.

Edited by citylife, 15 October 2009 - 06:45 AM.


#1095 Greenville

    City

  • Members+
  • 4,517 posts

Posted 15 October 2009 - 09:18 AM

Does anyone else find it funny that they tout being "family friendly," and then brag about their martini bar? I'm not saying that the two are mutually exclusive, but most places wouldn't try to pull both off at once. Needless to say, I am curious to see this. :lol:

Edited by Greenville, 15 October 2009 - 09:19 AM.


#1096 citylife

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,401 posts
  • Location:Greenville, SC

Posted 15 October 2009 - 11:02 AM

View PostGreenville, on Oct 15 2009, 11:18 AM, said:

Does anyone else find it funny that they tout being "family friendly," and then brag about their martini bar? I'm not saying that the two are mutually exclusive, but most places wouldn't try to pull both off at once. Needless to say, I am curious to see this. :lol:

There are bars downtown and they tout that as family friendly. Just sayin. :whistling:

#1097 GvilleSC

    Metropolis

  • Members+
  • 6,852 posts
  • Location:Greenville

Posted 15 October 2009 - 02:21 PM

I haven't decided how I feel about this newest announcement. Part of me is excited. The other half is disappointed with the continual down hill spiral that we've witnessed from the original plans to now, and thinks this may very well be a part of that... I'm reserving my judgement.

#1098 citylife

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,401 posts
  • Location:Greenville, SC

Posted 15 October 2009 - 02:50 PM

View PostGvilleSC, on Oct 15 2009, 04:21 PM, said:

I haven't decided how I feel about this newest announcement. Part of me is excited. The other half is disappointed with the continual down hill spiral that we've witnessed from the original plans to now, and thinks this may very well be a part of that... I'm reserving my judgement.

What downward spiral? :huh: Rooms To Go and Costco were always planned along with an entertainment district which this is. Just because the mixed use portion hasn't been built yet doesn't mean it won't in the future. We're in a recession in case you forgot.

Edited by citylife, 15 October 2009 - 02:58 PM.


#1099 Greenville

    City

  • Members+
  • 4,517 posts

Posted 15 October 2009 - 05:39 PM

View Postcitylife, on Oct 15 2009, 12:02 PM, said:

There are bars downtown and they tout that as family friendly. Just sayin. :whistling:

Such as? :dunno:

#1100 citylife

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,401 posts
  • Location:Greenville, SC

Posted 15 October 2009 - 05:44 PM

View PostGreenville, on Oct 15 2009, 07:39 PM, said:

Such as? :dunno:


City Tavern, Sharkey's, Addy's, Corner Pocket, etc.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users