runawayjim, on Sep 12 2006, 04:08 PM, said:
Smith Hill wants retail
#41
Posted 12 September 2006 - 05:28 PM
#44
Posted 01 August 2007 - 10:37 AM
#46
Posted 27 November 2007 - 07:45 AM
Frankie811, on Nov 27 2007, 07:11 AM, said:
Smith Hill is getting the supermarket it has long pined for, after ALDI Supermarkets announced yesterday that it will take over the vacant Valueland property on Smith Street.
thanks frankie! lots of info in that article. not only will smith hill be getting a grocery store, but they're also hoping for a bank and a pharmacy in that location as well. unfortunately, it looks as though this will end up becoming a shopping plaza/strip mall. hopefully one of the doors will be at the sidewalk since the building is already built that way.
in addition, there's a blurb at the end of that that says that the price rite in olneyville sq is going to move to eagle sq and take over the shaw's location (though i thought the shaw's location was too big for a store like price rite).
#47
Posted 27 November 2007 - 07:50 AM
also interesting is that tidbit about PriceRite and eagle square. I cannot fathom for one instant how they will afford the lease on that property. I sure hope the city isn't subsidizing this in any way... an earlier quote on this issue said that they were not going to subdivide the space so...what's changed?
#48
Posted 27 November 2007 - 07:59 AM
but im still going to call it Valueland
#49
Posted 27 November 2007 - 08:08 AM
Quote
#50
Posted 27 November 2007 - 08:28 AM
This whole Eagle Square Pricerite thing is just weird.
Quote
I agree with the Councilwoman, it will be hard to fill that hole in Olneyville Square, but in a perfect world we'd see Atlantic Mills and the Pricerite plaza redeveloped and we'd have useful buildings and parkland right up to the river, instead of a surface lot like we do now. Of course that would open a whole host of gentrification issues, but only if not done thoughtfully. I'm not holding my breath on any of that right now.
#51
Posted 27 November 2007 - 09:11 AM
jencoleslaw, on Nov 27 2007, 08:50 AM, said:
Price-Rite manages to afford the rent on Rt2 in Warwick, which I assume must be pretty steep. I just hope that in a larger store they will have more cashiers. I'm tired of spending 30-45minutes in line to check out.
#52
Posted 27 November 2007 - 09:48 AM
Liamlunchtray, on Nov 27 2007, 10:11 AM, said:
#53
Posted 27 November 2007 - 03:56 PM
I have also noticed a bunch of retail vacancies lately.. Mildly concerning.. In between Staples and the mattress store.. Maybe it was HR Block and was only seasonal.. Not sure..
Also I am terrified of Cotuit's nutcrackhead picture... nightmares.. not even kidding.. Pure evil..
I have not driven down to Riverside Gateway yet.. Has anyone else? I think the swap meet type thing currently in the mill there actually works.. If they graded the parking lot and repaved it its really not that bad as a functioning wholesale/retail/compton & watts swap meet..
#55
Posted 27 November 2007 - 07:30 PM
TheAnk, on Nov 27 2007, 04:56 PM, said:
Man, I would love to see the old Price Rite come down. Beyond being ugly and awful it is in pretty tough shape - Lots of leaks in the roof - just tired. A big box that has outlived its welcome.
The store itself is kind of comparable to those old Wonderfood Warehouse stores or Big-D. Pallets of super low priced stuff, limited selection, lots of house brand, super cheap.
#56
Posted 27 November 2007 - 08:42 PM
TheAnk, on Nov 27 2007, 04:56 PM, said:
While I liked the signage from the highway, I feel that the American Locomotive neighbor will suffer from the same fate. I can see that, in some parts, it appears overdesigned. The retail mix that they are trying to attract will not fare well in Providence either. Feldco explained what they thought would work from the very beginning, based on their expertise, and everyone challenged them from the bottom up. Was it possible to save a few buildings and construct an easily accessible self-serving neighborhood retail center without constructing multi-freestanding buildings that block access in an effort to appease a few nutjobs? I think so. Now it appears that the city will be stuck with a hulking mass of vacant undesirable space. Where does it give?
#57
Posted 29 November 2007 - 08:38 AM
As evil as this may sound to people, Staples and Shaws and the like may have been a few phases early.. There is positive going on for sure, but you can't force it.. You can't just toss a Capital Grille in the ghetto; you have to start with an Applebee's, then go to an Outback, etc, as the resident population "improves"..
A quick notice of the stores who are staying notes that these stores cater to current population; Cingular, Mad Rags, Pay/Half, Popeyes, laudromat, RadioShack Hair/nails, etc..
I think that the ALCO project and PUENTE/Calendar Mills will provide the missing piece, daytime working folk.. Rising Sun is nice, but the amount of workforce there isn't large..
I will agree with you that the space where Radio Shack and the mattress place are is undesirable.. The rest of the buildings are ok.. Coincidentally, the most undesirable space is the exact building that housed Fort Thunder if I am not mistaken.. So we agree on this point completely..
#59
Posted 29 November 2007 - 07:02 PM
#60
Posted 29 November 2007 - 07:53 PM
mr2448, on Nov 29 2007, 08:02 PM, said:
that bit of smith street from chalkstone to orms (and even a little bit north of chalkstone and south of orms) is actually very vibrant and active. you've got the bars and the post office and restaurants and shops. it's an awesome little commercial zone. i just wish the earthen vessel didn't close. i had been meaning to check it out and when i got around to it, it was too late.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














