[Liamlunchtray]

I feel that at this point the Arcade has at best a 50% chance of survival. At what point do we have so few buildings left that the parking lots are useless because there is no place to go once your car is parked?

[09/21/38]

AS long as they DON'T put out their recycling bins they should be safe from demolition and pickup.

[FjmArch]

Overheard today, A representative from THE HUB will be in Providence soon to look at The Arcade as a potential Space. If you are not familiar with THE HUB, this is an excerpt from the Bay Area Hub website.

"The Hub is a coworking space, event series, and professional toolset for changemakers!
During the day, The Hub is a dynamic, collision-rich workspace designed by its Members and the wisdom gleaned from Hub communities throughout the world. Social innovators in the Bay Area are leaving their sterile offices, noisy cafes, and isolated living rooms to work alongside diverse peers in a professionally hosted environment. They choose The Hub because it’s where they find the access, tools, community, and inspiration they need to transform their ideas into action.

At night, The Hub transforms into an event platform for member driven
collaborations, lectures, screenings, innovation labs, and some of the most compelling and imaginative minds from around the world."

[Cotuit]

The Hub sounds awesome and would be great to have in Providence, but the Arcade needs to be open to the public with retail in it. If The Hub can utilize the 2nd and 3rd levels and bring retail back to the ground level, I'm all for it. If the whole building is all The Hub top to bottom, then I don't like it.

[evaprov]

Yes, it's true. The Hub North America was here on Mon25 and Tue26 to assess the possibility of a Hub Providence. The visit was positive and we are moving forward. See the thread http://tinyurl.com/y9agha2 for more info. ~ Eva

[Wilton]

evaprov, on 27 January 2010 - 11:18 AM, said:

Yes, it's true. The Hub North America was here on Mon25 and Tue26 to assess the possibility of a Hub Providence. The visit was positive and we are moving forward. See the thread http://tinyurl.com/y9agha2 for more info. ~ Eva

"Rumor Confirmed"
They were here this morning (Wed).

Attached thumbnail(s)

• 
• 

[FjmArch]

Cotuit, on 24 January 2010 - 12:35 PM, said:

The Hub sounds awesome and would be great to have in Providence, but the Arcade needs to be open to the public with retail in it. If The Hub can utilize the 2nd and 3rd levels and bring retail back to the ground level, I'm all for it. If the whole building is all The Hub top to bottom, then I don't like it.

That is a great idea, rather than support an international group that may save one of the most important buildings downtown and actually bring some recognition to Providence as being first in something good for a change; Let's let the building languish and await its turn with the wrecking ball because it should have a sandwich shop on the first floor.

[Cotuit]

FjmArch, on 28 January 2010 - 03:20 PM, said:

That is a great idea, rather than support an international group that may save one of the most important buildings downtown and actually bring some recognition to Providence as being first in something good for a change; Let's let the building languish and await its turn with the wrecking ball because it should have a sandwich shop on the first floor.

Holy angry reply! Yes, that is exactly what I said.

[09/21/38]

The Arcade was always built as a place for local vendors to sell products. So it should remain as a retail location, open to the public. If a private company wants to lease the upper floor as some kind of business incubator then fine.

But the lower two floors should be used by local merchants selling locally grown or created in RI products.


Having said that if a new out of town developer came forward and said I like that vacant lot where the 110 was going to be built and I would like to revise that project but I need to take the Arcade would anyone vote in favor of it?

[FjmArch]

09/21/38, on 29 January 2010 - 12:43 PM, said:

The Arcade was always built as a place for local vendors to sell products. So it should remain as a retail location, open to the public. If a private company wants to lease the upper floor as some kind of business incubator then fine.

But the lower two floors should be used by local merchants selling locally grown or created in RI products.


Having said that if a new out of town developer came forward and said I like that vacant lot where the 110 was going to be built and I would like to revise that project but I need to take the Arcade would anyone vote in favor of it?

Now that is flawed logic, but if that is the way things should be than a task force needs to be established to eliminate all of the residential downtown, destroy the new RISD library that is in a former bank building; for that matter most of RISD's buildings need to be returned to warehouse and manufacturing uses, there will also be a reconversion to manufacturing at all of the mills that have been converted office and residential uses.......


But then again if "THE HUB" does decide to come into town and buy the arcade it really won't matter what any of us think.

[Cotuit]

FjmArch, on 30 January 2010 - 07:00 AM, said:

But then again if "THE HUB" does decide to come into town and buy the arcade it really won't matter what any of us think.

My understanding from talking to people is they do not have any intention of buying any property anywhere. And the question they had about the Arcade was who would run the retail on the ground floor.

The owners of the Arcade are looking for someone to take over the whole building, The Hub is looking for a very small part of the Arcade's available space, and hoping someone else will take care of making active and leasing the rest of the space.

[Cotuit]

FjmArch, on 30 January 2010 - 07:00 AM, said:

Now that is flawed logic, but if that is the way things should be than a task force needs to be established to eliminate all of the residential downtown, destroy the new RISD library that is in a former bank building; for that matter most of RISD's buildings need to be returned to warehouse and manufacturing uses, there will also be a reconversion to manufacturing at all of the mills that have been converted office and residential uses.......

There you go again, taking something someone said and running off to a conclusion that seems a leap.

There is nothing flawed about the logic of the Arcade remaining with it's purpose built use. It does not require the massive leap you took to see why it makes sense for the Arcade to remain a retail building, at least on the first floor.

It is a national treasure and anything that reduces the public's access to it, is a threat.

Let me throw your leap back at you... Should it be OK to turn the State House or City Hall into private offices or condos? I mean as long as the buildings aren't torn down, the use doesn't matter at all does it?

[FjmArch]

Cotuit, on 30 January 2010 - 02:47 PM, said:

There you go again, taking something someone said and running off to a conclusion that seems a leap.

There is nothing flawed about the logic of the Arcade remaining with it's purpose built use. It does not require the massive leap you took to see why it makes sense for the Arcade to remain a retail building, at least on the first floor.

It is a national treasure and anything that reduces the public's access to it, is a threat.

Let me throw your leap back at you... Should it be OK to turn the State House or City Hall into private offices or condos? I mean as long as the buildings aren't torn down, the use doesn't matter at all does it?

Ha! I guess if the General Assembly and the local governments keep running things the way they are that may be an option someday soon!!!

[Wilton]

They're baaaaaack (Wed. morning 2-4-10)

Attached thumbnail(s)

• 
• 

[09/21/38]

The Arcade is a local landmark as is the State House, City Hall, Propect Park, the Biltmore, Etc.

Landmarks give identity to a city and should be preserved for future generations to admire.

But if a change to the function of the landmark has to be made in order to save the building, than I vote to save the building.

You are right that there have been many examples of local landmarks that now have different uses. Maybe we need to keep an open mind when exploring the future of the Arcade.

This post has been edited by 09/21/38: 16 February 2010 - 10:44 AM