UrbanPlanet.org: Two New Interstates for GA? - UrbanPlanet.org

Jump to content

Project Database

Georgia projects are listed in our Project Database. Click here to view!
  • (9 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Two New Interstates for GA? I-3 and I-14 proposed Rate Topic: -----

#21 User is offline   bobliocatt 

  • City
  • Icon
  • Group: Members+
  • Posts: 4,850
  • Joined: 09-August 03

Posted 05 March 2005 - 09:45 PM

Interstate 67 is already planned from Montgomery, through Dothan, to Panama City.
0

 

#22 User is offline   derrickskugler 

  • Whistle-Stop
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members+
  • Posts: 135
  • Joined: 04-March 05

Posted 05 March 2005 - 10:09 PM

Well I guess that takes care of that. :-> Thanks Lakelander.
0

#23 User is offline   ATLman1 

  • Hamlet
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 996
  • Joined: 08-January 05
  • Location:Atlanta/Columbus

Posted 17 March 2005 - 10:14 PM

derrickskugler, on Mar 5 2005, 10:31 PM, said:

I believe that extending I-185 from Columbus to somewhere around Destin/Panama City in the panhandle of Florida would be the single most useful new road in the state outside of Metro Atlanta.  There is ZERO drawback to this happening...  and honestly, there is ZERO drawback to this happening if the road runs through Alabama, too.  It's such a good idea that I can't believe that I've never thought of it before.  LOL


I have heard of plans of extending I-185 to I-10. It is at least 25 years away though unfortunately. Where I-185 stops at Fort Benning, the highway that goes to Albany, GA is already 4-laned the whole way. Also, GA DOT is 4-laning U.S. 27 down to FL. These are two possible options to take I-185 on down to I-10. U.S. 431 that passes through the Columbus metro area on the Alabama side is now finishing up its 4-lane construction. That will make U.S. 431 4-laned all of the way from Columbus to Panama City. That highway is considered one of the most dangerous in America. That is why they are working fast to get the highway completed.
0

#24 User is offline   Southron 

  • Burg
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 2,366
  • Joined: 20-July 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Deep South U.S.

Posted 31 March 2005 - 02:42 AM

We don't need any new sprawl corridors, we have enough of those already. I hope all these new interstate proposals die and stay dead.

#25 User is offline   Martinman 

  • Burg
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members+
  • Posts: 1,628
  • Joined: 18-March 05

Posted 02 April 2005 - 11:28 AM

ExpatBaman, on Mar 31 2005, 03:42 AM, said:

We don't need any new sprawl corridors, we have enough of those already.  I hope all these new interstate proposals die and stay dead.


I think areas outside of metro Atl can use all the sprawl (i.e. growth and economic development) they can get. Most of the areas where these roads would go are small enough that sprawl won't be a major issue and we need other areas of the state to kick up their growth.
0

#26 User is offline   thehappysmith 

  • Whistle-Stop
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members+
  • Posts: 136
  • Joined: 01-March 05
  • Location:Tampa

Posted 15 April 2005 - 05:08 PM

I-14 and the Fall Line Freeway are in fact different roads along different corridors. They are very close to one another, but don't travel the same routing except for a portion of their length that overlays I-75 and possibly other parts east of Macon. That said, many parts of the Fall line Freeway are already up to the proposed standards for the Freeway, although I don't know whether any of it is so designated yet. I drove on part of the route last October but didn't notice any signs.
I-14 is generally south of Fall Line Freeway, running through Cussetta, Buena Vista, Ellaville, and Oglethorpe, and then joining I-75 before running east again through Warner-Robins (south of the base), and then apparently on an entirely new routing across I-16 to Sandersville and, eventually, Wrens. Wrens, I used to go through there all the time. This'll destroy that little town, but anyway, it's supposed to bump into US 1 somewhere just north of Wrens and then take US 1 to 520. Apparently they're going to renumber 520 as 14, although that may just be a proposal.
Like the Wiregrass Parkway along US 84 from Jesup to Dothan, Fall Line Freeway is not meant to be interstate-grade.

I think I-14 is warranted and very worthwhile. It has significantly more Congressional support than does I-3 (which I agree would never actually be named that). A proposal even exists to extend I-14 east to Myrtle Beach (over what routing I have no idea) and west to Austin.

As for I-3, Georgia will probably undertake to build most of the in-state part of the road itself. North Carolina would probably never consent to sending the road around Murphy, but one never knows. I like Murphy. I'd hate to see the road wreck that town, and I have to think it would.
0

#27 User is offline   Hybrid0NE 

  • Hamlet
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Editor
  • Posts: 590
  • Joined: 03-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Atlanta's Sprawl

Posted 17 April 2005 - 11:23 PM

paulblackgsx, on Jan 5 2005, 10:08 PM, said:

Half of the reason for the new interstates is that they don't go through Atlanta.  They are intended to spur growth in areas not currently served by an interstate highway, as well as provide transportation options (i.e. trucking industry) alternatives to the high congested Atlanta area.


Ah... that's the answer I was looking for. I was wondering why none of the new interstate routes when through Atlanta. All of the interstates in Georgia (except 95) seem to have gotten sucked into the metro area.
0

#28 User is offline   ATLman1 

  • Hamlet
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 996
  • Joined: 08-January 05
  • Location:Atlanta/Columbus

Posted 20 April 2005 - 03:57 PM

What is the chance that I-14 will be built? The highway is already there basically, it just has to be converted into an interstate. What is the timeline for this if it does happen?
0

#29 User is offline   Topher1 

  • Hamlet
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members+
  • Posts: 633
  • Joined: 04-October 03
  • Location:ORL, MIA, AGS

Posted 20 April 2005 - 08:37 PM

^ As far as I understand, these are just pipe dreams right now. Just from the gossip and various news clippings, I-14 is the more likely of the two to happen, but it could be a decade before it begins.

An article in today's Augusta Chronicle, however, stated that the Augusta area is really going to start pushing for a north/south route similar to the I-3 alignment. They really want an interstate from Savannah to Augusta to Greenville (which differs from the proposal on the northern end). So which one is built first will depend on who lobbies more I suppose...

I think these would have a much better chance of being built quickly if the state hadn't just spent so much money on the Fall Line "Freeway" and the Savannah River Parkway...
0

#30 User is offline   Topher1 

  • Hamlet
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members+
  • Posts: 633
  • Joined: 04-October 03
  • Location:ORL, MIA, AGS

Posted 20 April 2005 - 08:45 PM

My personal alignment that I'd like to see is a take on the I-3 proposal. I'd love to see I-3 snake off of I-16 or I-95 near Savannah and head up parallelling the river. It'd hit and join I-520 in South Augusta, and cross the river into SC, following the (currently U/C) SC I-520 portion through N. Augusta, up to 520's terminus at I-20. From there it would follow parallel to the river, providing interstate access to SC's most isolated counties (Edgefield, McCormick, Saluda, Greenwood, Abbeville) before it connected with Greenville's highway system and ended there.
0

#31 User is offline   teshadoh 

  • Burg
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members+
  • Posts: 2,384
  • Joined: 03-May 04
  • Location:Schlongmont CO

Posted 21 April 2005 - 02:14 PM

Just to put in my 2 cents - though I am primarily a supporter of public transit, I do admit I support [inter]state routes. To clarify my point, I consider interstate routes that provide access to rural areas as well as speedy connection between urban areas a neccessity. Unfortunately, they have transformed rural areas surrounding urban areas into sprawl, I consider this an unneccessary occurance.

Though this has likely been pointed out already - here are my preffered routings:

* I-3 (it shouldn't be I-3 though, but 77 & 79 are already taken - still something else would be better) it should go from Savannah to Augusta, then north to Greenville, SC & connect that city to I-26 in NC. Though I think Athens, GA should have an interstate connection to I 20 or I 85, a 3 digit Interstate route would make sense (I-120 for example)

* I-14 should really be an extension of I-16 from Macon to Columbus and on to I-85, again - the route from Macon to Augusta could be I-316.
0

#32 User is offline   randy1 

  • Unincorporated Area
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 70
  • Joined: 04-January 05
  • Location:Charleston

Posted 24 April 2005 - 01:19 PM

thehappysmith, on Apr 15 2005, 07:08 PM, said:

I think I-14 is warranted and very worthwhile.  It has significantly more Congressional support than does I-3 (which I agree would never actually be named that).  A proposal even exists to extend I-14 east to Myrtle Beach (over what routing I have no idea) and west to Austin. 





Does anyone know what the route might be if it goes to Myrtle Beach? The only way I see is if it either follows I-20 or dip through Charleston.
0

#33 User is offline   ATLman1 

  • Hamlet
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 996
  • Joined: 08-January 05
  • Location:Atlanta/Columbus

Posted 24 April 2005 - 03:15 PM

randy1, on Apr 24 2005, 02:19 PM, said:

Does anyone know what the route might be if it goes to Myrtle Beach?  The only way I see is if it either follows I-20 or dip through Charleston.


It will stop in Augusta, GA I believe. I haven't heard anything of it extending into SC.

This post has been edited by ATLman1: 24 April 2005 - 03:16 PM

0

#34 User is offline   BoDragon 

  • Burg
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members+
  • Posts: 1,483
  • Joined: 25-April 05

Posted 26 April 2005 - 08:05 AM

teshadoh, on Apr 21 2005, 04:14 PM, said:

* I-3 (it shouldn't be I-3 though, but 77 & 79 are already taken - still something else would be better) it should go from Savannah to Augusta, then north to Greenville, SC & connect that city to I-26 in NC.  Though I think Athens, GA should have an interstate connection to I 20 or I 85, a 3 digit Interstate route would make sense (I-120 for example)


It would be great to have an Interstate from Greenville to Savannah, but I doubt it will happen. The major route in this area is US 25, which most parts are not up to Interstate standards in South Carolina. From the NC State line to Greenville, US 25 is a divided four lane road with grade level interesctions and traffic lights. From Greenville towards below south of Greenwood, US 25 is a four lane undivided highway. From its split with US 178, US 25 is a two lane road through Edgefield and North Augusta; I'm sure there are plans to widen it to four lanes in a few years.

teshadoh, on Apr 21 2005, 04:14 PM, said:

* I-14 should really be an extension of I-16 from Macon to Columbus and on to I-85, again - the route from Macon to Augusta could be I-316.


Extending I-16 is a very logical idea.

Is it feasible to extend I-24 from Knoxville to Athens, Augusta, and Savannah or I-77 from Columbia to Savannah?
0

#35 User is offline   Spartan 

  • Gigalopolis
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Global Moderators
  • Posts: 15,921
  • Joined: 17-March 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 26 April 2005 - 03:58 PM

The only solution for MB will be I-73, or posisbly an exention of I-20. The interstate for GA would only serve GA, but I think it would be a worthwhile project to boost the economy in other places besides Atlanta.

#36 User is offline   Metroinspect. 

  • Unincorporated Area
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 61
  • Joined: 19-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Griffin, Georgia

Post icon  Posted 19 May 2005 - 03:39 PM

I think if I-16 should be extended, it shall go westard toward Birmingham, and I-14 is a perfect plan, due to it connecting important metro areas, and if I-3 is approved, it should go from Savannah to Augusta to Greenville, S.C, but an transit such as the high speed rail system would be better for most parts of Georgia

This post has been edited by Metroinspect.: 19 May 2005 - 10:57 PM

0

#37 User is offline   dromulus 

  • Unincorporated Area
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 49
  • Joined: 20-May 05

Posted 25 May 2005 - 08:13 PM

i think augusta will benefit tremendously. out of the 3 and 14 interstates passing through, it will have so much more prominence as a southeast transportation center. i can't think of another city which would benefit more. what do you guys think?
0

#38 User is offline   Topher1 

  • Hamlet
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members+
  • Posts: 633
  • Joined: 04-October 03
  • Location:ORL, MIA, AGS

Posted 25 May 2005 - 08:29 PM

dromulus, on May 25 2005, 08:13 PM, said:

i think augusta will benefit tremendously.  out of the 3 and 14 interstates passing through, it will have so much more prominence as a southeast transportation center.  i can't think of another city which would benefit more.  what do you guys think?


I agree completely, which is why I completely support these new interstates more than most on here :) The best thing, is the urban fabric of Augusta would hardly be disturbed, as both of these interstates could easily join with I-520 during their treks through town.
0

#39 User is offline   BoDragon 

  • Burg
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members+
  • Posts: 1,483
  • Joined: 25-April 05

Posted 25 May 2005 - 09:25 PM

Metroinspect., on May 19 2005, 05:39 PM, said:

I think if I-16 should be extended, it shall go westard toward Birmingham, and I-14 is a perfect plan, due to it connecting important metro areas, and if I-3 is approved, it should go from Savannah to Augusta to Greenville, S.C, but an transit such as the high speed rail system would be better for most parts of Georgia


Just curious, has anyone ever driven from Greenville, SC to Augusta, GA? If so, could you determine if an interstate route could work?

Secondly, is it possible to extend either Interstate 24 (from Chattanooga) or 81 (from east of Knoxville) to Savannah?
0

#40 User is offline   Topher1 

  • Hamlet
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members+
  • Posts: 633
  • Joined: 04-October 03
  • Location:ORL, MIA, AGS

Posted 25 May 2005 - 09:44 PM

BoDragon, on May 25 2005, 09:25 PM, said:

Just curious, has anyone ever driven from Greenville, SC to Augusta, GA?  If so, could you determine if an interstate route could work?


I've driven from Greenville to Augusta fairly frequently, and I believe an interstate route could work. Some of the areas that it could serve would be Edgefield/Trenton, Greenwood, Clark's Hill Lake/Recreation Areas, and Abbeville. These are mostly areas that were once much more important towns, but they were left behind because of lack of transportation access.

Much of the route already has a 4-lane US Hwy 25. The entire stretch from Greenwood to Greenville is 4 lanes. As well as the Aiken/Edgefield county border on into Augusta. Current plans have the I-520 extension connecting to I-20 in SC at the US 25 exit in North Augusta. Since this is the case, it would make a lot of sense to just continue that highway north along the route of US 25. The only tricky areas of the trip would be Greenwood (a close bypass would work), Edgefield (bypassing just west of town would work fine), and I'm not sure where it could connect in Greenville.
0

  • (9 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users