Graffiti
#221
Posted 02 April 2007 - 10:34 AM
#222
Posted 03 April 2007 - 07:06 PM
#223
Posted 04 April 2007 - 04:48 AM
#224
Posted 04 April 2007 - 05:56 AM
#225
Posted 04 April 2007 - 06:05 AM
Cotuit, on Apr 3 2007, 08:06 PM, said:

#226
Posted 04 April 2007 - 09:47 AM
jencoleslaw, on Apr 4 2007, 07:56 AM, said:
Ah Leon's I loved that place. I think it's fair to say it was the Nicks of its day.
#228
Posted 04 April 2007 - 09:58 AM
jencoleslaw, on Apr 4 2007, 07:56 AM, said:
#229
Posted 04 April 2007 - 06:50 PM
Cotuit, on Apr 3 2007, 08:06 PM, said:
#230
Posted 04 April 2007 - 07:36 PM
If I didn't mention it here before, we will also have members of the WBNA discussing some of their work. If you live in another part of the city, or even if you live on the West Side and are interested in the WBNAs work, this is a great opportunity to hear about it.
And even with all of that, there will be plenty of time to meet and mingle and enjoy drinks and tater tots (yes, MoJoe's has tots!).
#231
Posted 05 April 2007 - 11:00 PM
Cotuit, on Apr 2 2007, 09:00 AM, said:
Not that I'm defending the taggers, but I actually do enjoy the one just north of Branch (clearly visible from Royal Little Dr, right outside AAA) - Rocky, Bullwinkle, Boris, Natasha, Mr. Peabody and Sherman all on a wall... it's actually sorta enjoyable. I'll have to post some pictures.
Overall, though, the city's response to graffiti has been ridiculous. Having lived in Roger Williams Park and seeing the response there.... yow, we should really be embarrassed. They'd replace all the signs about once a year, and they'd be thoroughly tagged three days later. Then, about a month later, they'd paint over the graffiti - completely destroying the sign in the process. And that's how it would stay. It really was awful to see an area that should be cleaned up and made presentable (it is an awesome park) turned into an urban wasteland.
#232
Posted 10 April 2007 - 10:16 AM
Cotuit, on Apr 4 2007, 08:36 PM, said:
If I didn't mention it here before, we will also have members of the WBNA discussing some of their work. If you live in another part of the city, or even if you live on the West Side and are interested in the WBNAs work, this is a great opportunity to hear about it.
And even with all of that, there will be plenty of time to meet and mingle and enjoy drinks and tater tots (yes, MoJoe's has tots!).
- Garris
#233
Posted 10 April 2007 - 10:58 AM
Garris, on Apr 10 2007, 11:16 AM, said:
- Garris
The following link offers a plan of action, based on programs implemented in other cities. I'm anxious to hear from anyone who is willing to help me implement any of these strategies here in Providence. A community-based anti-graffiti effort, in partnership with the city, could be very successful.
GraffitiHurts.org
#234
Posted 12 April 2007 - 07:02 AM
Cotuit, on Apr 3 2007, 08:06 PM, said:

More importantly, was there any discussion about the next steps that we need to take on this issue?
I enjoyed meeting everyone and look forward to working on this.
#235
Posted 12 April 2007 - 10:26 AM
quente, on Apr 12 2007, 09:02 AM, said:
More importantly, was there any discussion about the next steps that we need to take on this issue?
I enjoyed meeting everyone and look forward to working on this.
there's a $500 reward for anyone who leads to the capture of a graffiti vandal.
there will also be penalties put in place for private property owners who don't clean graffiti within 10 days of being notified by the city. however, as bad as that sounds, the city will offer their resources to help in the clean up during those 10 days. after those 10 days, the city will do it and the owner will be responsible for the cost of removal.
that's all i remember. they also didn't know that their online form was down and suggested people call 1-800-TAGGERS until it gets fixed.
#236
Posted 12 April 2007 - 01:12 PM
Due to their equipment not being able to work in temps below freezing, they've lost some ground over the winter, especially in notorious hot spots such as Waterplace. The question was asked about investing in equipment that can work during the winter months. The equipment they have is the result of one of the only affordable bids they received on purchasing equipment. They do want to get equipment that can work during the winter.
In addition to the Taskforce, the Parks Department has their own graffiti removal program and the Downtown Improvement District has a graffiti removal program Downtown.
The plan for the spring and the summer is to catch up on the complaints that have piled up during the winter. Also, they will be launching 10 community watch programs. Community leaders will watch for an report graffiti and clean up days will be organized with those groups.
The Providence Police have been able to head off several gang related crimes due to their ability to read the messages left through tagging between gang members.
The focus right now is on public property, the Taskforce does not need to obtain permission to clean public property and they have had a lot of problems with explicit graffiti on/near schools (some of my photos from Waterplace last year will attest to that). As reports come in, notices will be issued to private property owners that they have 10 days to clean the graffiti on their property or the city will do it (and charge them) for them. I neglected to ask if there were any other fees or fines for failure to comply or what the fee was to have the city remove the graffiti.
Many (most?) of the offenders caught thus far are minors. Cases involving minors are handled through the Family Court. The city wants the punishment to be community service including graffiti removal, but they need to work with the court to get them to issue that as a sentence. In some cases offenders have priors which mean they will be facing jail time.
I'm trying to remember what else, as I think about more I'll post more.
#237
Posted 27 April 2007 - 11:21 AM
Cotuit, on Apr 12 2007, 03:12 PM, said:
Due to their equipment not being able to work in temps below freezing, they've lost some ground over the winter, especially in notorious hot spots such as Waterplace. The question was asked about investing in equipment that can work during the winter months. The equipment they have is the result of one of the only affordable bids they received on purchasing equipment. They do want to get equipment that can work during the winter.
In addition to the Taskforce, the Parks Department has their own graffiti removal program and the Downtown Improvement District has a graffiti removal program Downtown.
The plan for the spring and the summer is to catch up on the complaints that have piled up during the winter. Also, they will be launching 10 community watch programs. Community leaders will watch for an report graffiti and clean up days will be organized with those groups.
The Providence Police have been able to head off several gang related crimes due to their ability to read the messages left through tagging between gang members.
The focus right now is on public property, the Taskforce does not need to obtain permission to clean public property and they have had a lot of problems with explicit graffiti on/near schools (some of my photos from Waterplace last year will attest to that). As reports come in, notices will be issued to private property owners that they have 10 days to clean the graffiti on their property or the city will do it (and charge them) for them. I neglected to ask if there were any other fees or fines for failure to comply or what the fee was to have the city remove the graffiti.
Many (most?) of the offenders caught thus far are minors. Cases involving minors are handled through the Family Court. The city wants the punishment to be community service including graffiti removal, but they need to work with the court to get them to issue that as a sentence. In some cases offenders have priors which mean they will be facing jail time.
I'm trying to remember what else, as I think about more I'll post more.
#238
Posted 28 April 2007 - 02:06 PM
MikeR, on Apr 27 2007, 01:21 PM, said:
That area would not fall under the city's taskforce, that is the responsibility of the state and the contractors building the I-Way. The city has been meeting with the state and the utilities to get them to be more agressive on removal from thier property.
#239
Posted 30 April 2007 - 09:01 AM
If it doesn't bother everyone else who owns a house on this street, it should. I've witnessed roughly $50,000 worth of home improvement-related investment in the properties (8-10 houses) adjacent to mine in the last 2 years, including the multi-family home which was used as a "canvass." One reckless act with a $3 can of paint is enough to overshadow all these good things. A friend of mine who had never been to the neighborhood before stopped by my house last week. Her first question after taking a look out the window was: "Is this a rough neighborhood?!" I think this mess and all of them should be cleaned up immediately - to send a message to the taggers that Providence doesn't tolerate this.
If it was up to me I would pick up a can of Krylon white, walk over there and paint over it right now. But I obviously don't have any right to do that, and (presumably) neither does the city since no codes have been violated. So now what?!
#240
Posted 13 May 2007 - 11:06 AM
Edited by inProv, 13 May 2007 - 11:08 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














