Eastland Mall
#121
Posted 20 August 2005 - 01:38 AM
csedwards72, do like cantnot said and go during the day. Also, check out Harold Pener: Man of Fashion. It's a very urban store, but it's actually pretty nice.
#122
Posted 03 September 2005 - 04:56 PM
Edited by NOcityrox, 03 September 2005 - 04:57 PM.
#123
Posted 03 September 2005 - 09:23 PM
#124
Posted 04 September 2005 - 04:09 AM
Its unfortunate, but the vast majority of national retailers, which is what you are mostly going to find in a mall, are not interesting in locating in areas where they can't make money. And they can't make money in areas where people are afraid to go because the place is littered with crowds (mostly teenagers) who are there to "hang out". Retail is a shared responsibility. If a community wants to have retail, they have to behave decently enough to support it. If you want to see Eastland's future, look at the Freedom Mall. There used to be a Sears there too.
On the other hand, I think malls are bad for a community anyway.
#125
Posted 04 September 2005 - 06:16 AM
Even without the crime and demographic problems, Eastland would still struggle simply because it isn't on an interstate. I doubt any developer today would even consider a mall at a location served only by surface streets.
South Park may be surrounded by surface roads too, but it gradually built up to where it is. If all that land was available today, I doubt someone would propose making the entire thing retail.
When the Bridges in Mint Hill opens, we'll have a sparkling new mall, WITH interstate access, AWAY from east side. For just about any retailer, this choice is the epitome of "no-brainer".
Eastland's best hope is for an "angel" (one individual with a lot of money and vision) to step in and do something bold. It will not happen from a board or committee.
I have to wonder who exactly would be interested in buying the mall. Glimcher may find that serious buyers are shy, until they can see what impact The Bridges will have.
Edited by MZT, 04 September 2005 - 06:26 AM.
#126
Posted 04 September 2005 - 10:52 AM
#127
Posted 04 September 2005 - 05:13 PM
#128
Posted 05 September 2005 - 12:25 AM
The only big difference is that it's located next to a subway stop, but in many ways it's got the same logistics going against it as Eastland (in fact it's even older) yet it's successful.
Why? Because the mall owners give a damn about being in a minority neighborhood. There are a variety of stores, a mix of uses (including a senior center), and the grounds are well-kept. They replaced an empty five-and-dime with a very successful Target store, and recently performed a major renovation that makes the center look modern and fresh, even though it's nearly 50 years old.
PG Plaza is no Tysons Corner, but it's a glimpse of what Eastland could become in the right hands.
#129
Posted 07 September 2005 - 02:28 PM
StevenRocks, on Sep 5 2005, 01:25 AM, said:
Progress has been a long-time coming in P.G. Took a long time for retailers to connect that though it is a largely minority area, those that live there have some of the highest per-capita incomes in the nation. Residents would otherwise travel 20 miles into parts of DC or Annapolis to shop. They've been practically begging for local, reasonably upscale retail. I think it was that type of clamoring and available disposable income that led to the resurgence of PG Plaza.
The parallel is that several years ago it was a scary place to go; but the economic demographics have increased and so, it gradually got better. Retailers realized that if they invested, there were people there who would shop and spend. Hopefully Eastland and the whole east part of Charlotte can hope for a similar renaissance. The problem here is that east Charlotte residents can just very easily opt for other nearby shopping venues.
#130
Posted 07 September 2005 - 04:16 PM
UptownGrrl, on Sep 7 2005, 03:28 PM, said:
#131
Posted 17 September 2005 - 12:19 PM
http://kivera.dillar...Charlotte%2C+NC
Eastland isn't even listed on Dillard's own WEBSITE anymore!!!
#132
Posted 17 September 2005 - 02:42 PM
#133
Posted 17 September 2005 - 03:10 PM
Although I'm sure it's just a web error right now, I don't think Dillard's Eastland is going to be around a lot longer with Northlake opening. If it's not closing now, it'll probably be after Christmas.
#134
Posted 18 September 2005 - 09:16 PM
#135
Posted 01 October 2005 - 11:29 AM
#136
Posted 01 October 2005 - 11:34 AM
#137
Posted 04 October 2005 - 01:43 PM
MZT, on Oct 1 2005, 01:34 PM, said:
The Dillard's at Greenville Mall and McAlister Square in Greenville, SC both closed; the McAlister Square one closed in 1995 and the Greenville Mall closed recently- perhaps 2003. Both stores seemed well-stocked until the bitter end. Both malls died afterwards.
#138
Posted 04 October 2005 - 02:56 PM
csedwards72, on Oct 4 2005, 03:43 PM, said:
At Carolina Circle in Greensboro, I believe they went with the dreaded Dillard's Outlet conecpt, which was an expansion of the Ivey's Outlet which had taken over the lower level before Dillard's bought Ivey's. The mall finally died, but Monkey Ward's stayed on until bankruptcy, presiding over an empty mall surrounded by empty big box stores and empty banks...
Now it's a vacant lot awaiting a Wal-Mart Supercenter...
#139
Posted 04 October 2005 - 03:42 PM
otherstream, on Oct 4 2005, 04:56 PM, said:
Now it's a vacant lot awaiting a Wal-Mart Supercenter...
Greenville Mall also had a Dillard's clearance center on the second floor of the store. It was a sad sight. At least Eastland might avoid having one of those if the store is just closed rather than allowed to linger on. The main floor of the Greenville Mall store and the whole McAlister store seemed well-stocked, though.
Edited by csedwards72, 04 October 2005 - 03:43 PM.
#140
Posted 04 October 2005 - 03:44 PM
I would have liked for Dillards to have been incorporated into the redeveloped South Square somehow, even if a completely new store was included alongside Target and Sams. I think I'll always wonder though, why didn't they abandon South Square immediately when Belk and JCPenney did....Same thing with University Mall, I wonder if both Belk and Dillards had left if it would have remained a mall or been reinvented somehow. I recall a period of uncertainty when the mall owners were searching for a new anchor. Maybe Dillards saved that mall.
Anyway if any1 has any insight to the above, or comments feel free to respond
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














