Statler Hotel Demolition Progress Watch as Detroit Demolishes its History
#482
Posted 09 January 2006 - 07:32 PM
#485
Posted 10 January 2006 - 05:13 PM
Everyone says demolition, but the fence does not encircle the entire building - just the front. I am unaware of any renovation plans; however, they are in the process of doing some cleanup work on all the properties. Who knows with the Ilitches though? They are the type of people who can fly under the radar to do whatever they want.
#486
Posted 10 January 2006 - 09:46 PM
Allan, it appears a window is open on the second floor of the Fine Arts. When we explored that place over the summer, didn't I tell you to close it. Shame!!!
Oh, and it's quite amazing how stable the Fine Arts looks from the outside. Too bad the inside is a horrible wreck collapsing into the center of the building. I bet those workers nearly had a heart attack when they saw the floors sloping 30 degrees into a gaping black hole.
#487
Posted 11 January 2006 - 12:13 PM
#488
Posted 11 January 2006 - 12:51 PM

There was nobody working on the site today (though there was a back-hoe just around the corner at the former AAA building site) . The site looks like it'll be completely street level once they dump about a couple dozen truck load of soil.
Here's a photo of the back-hoe digging up where the AAA building used to be.

What's the plan for the AAA site? I'm assuming whatever they're doing is in preparation for the Super Bowl. Seems odd of them to dig a hole when they could leave it filled. Anyone have a clue?
Also, there was a street sweeping truck going around the job site which now has a thin layer of mud all around it. I don't know why they don't just wait until the job site itself is ready for a clean up.
[edit] fixed links to the images.
This post has been edited by Jin Kim: 11 January 2006 - 12:56 PM
#490
Posted 12 January 2006 - 02:22 PM
"The Fine Arts Building at Historic Grand Circus Park. Mixed use Opportunities Available"
It's nice to see that the Ilitches are finally going to unload some of the property that they don't really have much business owning. Shouldn't they just be advertising the facade for the Fine Arts, though? It's not much of a building anymore.
#492
Posted 12 January 2006 - 08:41 PM
Anyone with some info on status of that particular building?
#493
Posted 12 January 2006 - 09:11 PM
#494
Posted 12 January 2006 - 11:56 PM
This post has been edited by hudkina: 12 January 2006 - 11:58 PM
#495
Posted 15 January 2006 - 10:49 PM
hudkina, on Jan 13 2006, 12:56 AM, said:
I would realy like to see the facade saved (and sometime before in collapses in with the rest of the building) and it wouldn't as much of a hassle to work around the facade durring demolition and construction if the temporary supprot structure was placed on the outside as in te example.
#496
Posted 15 January 2006 - 11:39 PM
I agree it must suck when showing this place to developers.
Now if you'll follow me, we have a.... oh well, never mind.
#497
Posted 18 January 2006 - 02:20 PM
#498
Posted 26 January 2006 - 12:14 PM

Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote

