Jump to content

fieldmarshaldj

Members+
  • Posts

    2181
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by fieldmarshaldj

  1. 2 hours ago, smeagolsfree said:

    Not as butt ugly as this.

     

    See the source image

    That's pretty bad, too. But really, I think of Margaritaville, I think of something tropical. Tropical like, say, Miami Beach. And what does Miami Beach have ? Lots of stunning Art Deco/Art Moderne architecture. I mean, you know if I were in charge of approving plans, I'd want our downtown lined with Nouveau Second Empire buildings with some Nouveau Art Deco/Moderne sprinkled in for contrast. Take some inspiration from MB, have a giant neon-lit pink pelican on one side of the building and a green neon-lit palm tree on the other.

    • Like 1
  2. 3 hours ago, Pdt2f said:

    Is that really Nashville?!?! Looks like lower Manhattan or something. Are the buildings on the left and right with the columns still there? I’m having trouble thinking of what is currently at this intersection. 

    The ones on the left (south side of Union at 3rd) are still there, but 3 square blocks along the north (right) side from 1st to 4th below Deaderick were all demolished in the 1960s/early '70s (and then all the way up to Legislative Plaza shortly after for TPAC). The block between 3rd and 4th was where the First American would go up, but the 2 blocks to 1st were made into parking lots for the Courthouse (now the park). A dreadful loss of 19th and early 20th century buildings (and then the entirety of the buildings surrounding the courthouse were demolished by 1974).

    • Thanks 1
    • Sad 1
  3. 16 hours ago, Neigeville2 said:

    This isn't an argument against this transit plan, it's an argument against having a government.  Governments need oversight, not griping and oversimplified ideological arguments, which is unfortunately a lot easier to do.

    Nope, it's an argument against wasteful government spending. The one thing it has proven time and time again (be it federal, state or local) is how to get us trillions of dollars in debt, with little to nothing to show for it. To continue to pour money down a black hole and expect it will somehow be efficiently spent is ludicrous. If anyone in the private sector operated as the government did, they'd be out of business and in prison in short order.

    • Like 1
  4. 15 hours ago, rootARCH said:

    We were very encouraged that there were several "no's" in the room when we started and at the end of the night they turned into "yes's". It sounds like every business owner immediately around the site is now in favor of this concept? ( I might need to do some one on one conversations to confirm that) but we got a really nice call from the Eastside Smiles owner across the street and they love the idea that we are proposing. At the end of the night, the 5 spot guys were lobbying the angry(and very rude) neighbors who live 6-8 blocks down to get on board with the idea. WW is posting these pictures today so here they are. As of right now, the project will be reconsidered with the design team and we will go back to the drawing board to design a 3-story option that encompasses the site.

    17323_02_170926_forWW.jpg

    17323_03_170926_forWW.jpg

    The two-story base is fine, but that... thing... sitting on top is like a turd in the punchbowl. If I were a neighbor, I wouldn't want to look at that either. Something classy should rise from the base.

    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
  5. 6 hours ago, Pdt2f said:

    It’s in the same category as In-n-Out to me, a super famous burger place that gets talked up like crazy by people (especially those who hail from the region where you can find the restaurant), but ends up just being a standard run-of-the-mill greasy 5 Guys twin. Not bad, just overrated. A good sign that they’re looking here, though, as you mentioned. 

    Hey, I'm satisfied with just a Burger King. ^_^

    • Haha 3
  6. 10 hours ago, SoundScan said:

    Citation needed.

    Ordinarily, I'd give political examples, but I'll cite something that isn't and more relatable for everyone...

    Ebay, for example, recently decided to change your ability to view 200 items from a given category and instead made it just 48 or 50. So instead of having to scroll through one or two pages to see a day's worth of items ending, you've now got to go through 8 or more. And no way to change it back. Complaints fell on deaf ears.

    They also decided to change the feedback pages so that it's not only out of order of purchase, but you've got to go through every single item instead of having them neatly lined up in a row of 25 or more, meaning it takes 10 times as long to enter in feedback as it was before. There's more change for you.

    My personal favorite was Google changing the way you viewed and utilized maps early last year from a great, easy and convenient way from launch. Now it's worse than ever to navigate, plan and just take a "stroll."

    Some premier examples of change from "works just fine" to viscerally inconvenient, unneeded, unnecessary and lousy. To paraphrase a political slogan, "I'll keep my stuff, you keep the change."

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.