Jump to content

Charlotte-Douglas Airport (CLT) Expansion


uptownliving

Recommended Posts


18 minutes ago, Phillydog said:

Question for you airport/airline wizards out there -- 

There are only 5 US states with more than one metro that has international passenger service to Europe?  California (3), Florida (3), Texas (3), North Carolina (2), and Pennsylvania (2).  Is this correct?  If so, not too shabby North Carolina.

This sounds accurate. Most states are "all in" on one metro area being populated and then there is a cliff to any other metro in the state (i.e. Seattle & WA, Chicago & IL, Atlanta & GA, Denver & CO, Minneapolis/St. Paul & MN, et...). Other states, just have such small boundaries that the metro is most of the state (i.e. Boston = MA), et...

NC is probably most like Tennessee and Missouri having mid-sized metros, but no big 3 million+ person metro that dominates. Our population is very sprawling / spread out, versus concentrated. 

Edited by CLT2014
  • Like 3
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still down from 2019 traffic levels (50 million vs 43 million) but 6th place isn't bad. The top ten are:

  1. Atlanta
  2. Dallas
  3. Denver
  4. O'Hare
  5. Los Angeles
  6. Charlotte
  7. Orlando
  8. Guangzhou
  9. Chengdu
  10. Las Vegas

As the article alluded to, the rankings are likely temporary and airports in the US only ranked higher than their international counterparts (especially China and Western Europe) due to the lack of internal travel restrictions in the US.

HKG, which for many years was my home away from home and is my favorite airport to fly through, isn't even ranked amongst the top 35 busiest airports. Heartbreaking. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, LKN704 said:

Still down from 2019 traffic levels (50 million vs 43 million) but 6th place isn't bad. The top ten are:

  1. Atlanta
  2. Dallas
  3. Denver
  4. O'Hare
  5. Los Angeles
  6. Charlotte
  7. Orlando
  8. Guangzhou
  9. Chengdu
  10. Las Vegas

As the article alluded to, the rankings are likely temporary and airports in the US only ranked higher than their international counterparts (especially China and Western Europe) due to the lack of internal travel restrictions in the US.

HKG, which for many years was my home away from home and is my favorite airport to fly through, isn't even ranked amongst the top 35 busiest airports. Heartbreaking. 

Hong Kong is a very sad situation right now.  Pre-covid, the Chinese influence was already increasing in the area and China has used Covid to further do so.  Cathay Pacific is in shambles.

Honestly, I imagine they struggled to cracked the top 100, and may not have done so.

As of December 2021.  The only reported 1,350,000 travelers in the past 12 months.  A stark contrast from 2019 where they saw 71,415,245.

https://www.hongkongairport.com/iwov-resources/file/the-airport/hkia-at-a-glance/facts-figures/Dec2021e.pdf

For anyone interested.  Here are their monthly passenger counts.

https://www.hongkongairport.com/en/the-airport/hkia-at-a-glance/fact-figures.page

 

Despite it being an obvious anomaly, it's very cool to see CLT this high on the list.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LKN704 said:

Still down from 2019 traffic levels (50 million vs 43 million) but 6th place isn't bad. The top ten are:

  1. Atlanta
  2. Dallas
  3. Denver
  4. O'Hare
  5. Los Angeles
  6. Charlotte
  7. Orlando
  8. Guangzhou
  9. Chengdu
  10. Las Vegas

As the article alluded to, the rankings are likely temporary and airports in the US only ranked higher than their international counterparts (especially China and Western Europe) due to the lack of internal travel restrictions in the US.

HKG, which for many years was my home away from home and is my favorite airport to fly through, isn't even ranked amongst the top 35 busiest airports. Heartbreaking. 

#5 in terms of Aircraft Movements (which has always been our higher ranking)

https://aci.aero/2022/04/11/the-top-10-busiest-airports-in-the-world-revealed/

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They made the ceiling height to set expectations you are about to be shoved into a CRJ-900 where your head hits the ceiling and your bag can't fit onboard for your flight to the many miserable and dying cities served out of Concourse E. 

In all seriousness, the walkway doesn't look very wide. During boarding, passengers will line up / wait in the rather narrow walk way area and block other folks trying to get to other gates. The only thing that will help is none of the planes at these gates seat more than 80 people so you should get a little bit less crowding than an A320 or 737 with this little walking space.

Edited by CLT2014
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CLT2014 said:

They made the ceiling height to set expectations you are about to be shoved into a CRJ-900 where your head hits the ceiling and your bag can't fit onboard for your flight to the many miserable and dying cities like Allentown, Flint, Michigan, Huntington, WV and Jackson, MS served out of Concourse E. 

In all seriousness, the walkway doesn't look very wide. During boarding, passengers will line up / wait in the rather narrow walk way area and block other folks trying to get to other gates. The only thing that will help is none of the planes at these gates seat more than 80 people so you should get a little bit less crowding than an A320 or 737 with this little walking space.

Now, now...there are a couple of "sexier" places that are served out of the concourse...North Eleuthera comes to mind.

I think the concourse walkway is wider and the wall on the right-hand side is some sort of temporary construction wall. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, JBS said:

I actually think this looks good (though the art does look like viruses). I drove through the airport Friday night and the lights on new A and the lobby expansion looked very nice. 

Where exactly is E expansion? I tried to find a map online and couldn’t find it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Vitamin_N said:

I tweeted this and it ended up being my most-liked tweet ever. Which is a low bar, but still... One acquaintance of mine even booked a first class ticket with his AA miles. Aviation enthusiasts are an enthusiastic bunch! (Tried to give you some credit in the original tweet btw.)

https://twitter.com/PFDigest/status/1516113737819774982?t=9fSIpqmpzJZgzb4hAOhKlw&s=19

I'm not going to lie, I was very close to booking a flight but I'll already be out of town that week :( .  

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just in:

Frankfurt is being suspended this summer to compensate for the lack of pilots and widebody aircraft, both within the AA fleet and their JV partners. AA is adding another flight to MIA-LHR to compensate for the loss of a BA service due to their fleet shortage, and I am guessing that's where the 777 assigned to CLT-FRA is going. 

Last flight is 1 June. Service resumes (as of now) 7 September, but that all depends I guess on what fleet and staffing capabilities look like then. 

I'm guessing CLT-FRA was the weakest 777 route in the system. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, kermit said:

Aww man.
I am also guessing CLT-Munich is handing the bulk of the high-yield business traffic (along with Delta ATL-Stuttgart).

Perhaps.

At the same time, the devil's advocate in me thinks that the Frankfurt flight likely performs better than the Munich flight, but AA is not willing to risk the loss of corporate contracts on the Munich flight, which are likely crucial to the flight's survival, especially as they are a new entrant into the market and there is a competitor who has had consistent service for almost 20 years on the route now. 

There is no competitor to AA's CLT-Frankfurt flight (and it's far too late in the season for Lufthansa to introduce their own flight to Frankfurt...I doubt they would want to anyways), corporate contracts are likely far less important, and US/AA has been on the route now consistently going back to the 1990s, so it can likely afford to anger a few corporate clients for a few months, especially given that long-haul business travel is still down. 

Delta has actually discontinued their Atlanta-Stuttgart service. It's supposed to resume this Fall IIRC. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/19/2022 at 7:33 PM, LKN704 said:

Perhaps.

At the same time, the devil's advocate in me thinks that the Frankfurt flight likely performs better than the Munich flight, but AA is not willing to risk the loss of corporate contracts on the Munich flight, which are likely crucial to the flight's survival, especially as they are a new entrant into the market and there is a competitor who has had consistent service for almost 20 years on the route now. 

There is no competitor to AA's CLT-Frankfurt flight (and it's far too late in the season for Lufthansa to introduce their own flight to Frankfurt...I doubt they would want to anyways), corporate contracts are likely far less important, and US/AA has been on the route now consistently going back to the 1990s, so it can likely afford to anger a few corporate clients for a few months, especially given that long-haul business travel is still down. 

Delta has actually discontinued their Atlanta-Stuttgart service. It's supposed to resume this Fall IIRC. 

The airline told crews that the reason the service was suspended was a combination of too few widebodies and  slot issues at LHR. Don't use the slot, lose it. FRA isn't slot-controlled, so there's no worry about losing the route. The 777-200 in question will now fly MIA-LHR. CLT-FRA is scheduled to resume in the fall.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.