Jump to content

MSU Biomedical Research Campus - Phase II


GRDadof3

Recommended Posts


I've been thinking/eager about this for weeks, given that they should be making a formal 'decision' on Friday. I noticed in the agenda for the MSU Trustees meeting that it simply says "Former Press building demolition." 

 

I may go and report back live. Developing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always hoped that there was something buried out there waiting to be uncovered, but after a lot of (obsessive) searching this is the best I could find. In their October 9 meeting they did a presentation on what looks like either their design, or a basic schematic of what they're thinking...

 

Starts around page 25....

http://ipf.msu.edu/_files/pdfs/construction-cj-presentation-october-9-2014.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought this was supposed to be the big reveal? If not, when are they supposed to decide if the build it or if they let a private developer build it?

 

Joe

 

Today they voted to demolish the Press building ($3 Million) starting in March and move forward with building the new biomedical research center on the corner. They showed some slides at the board meeting of the site plan that I hadn't seen before, trying to get those. They were never looking at having a private developer build their facility, just to develop out the remainder of the site.

 

They're still tweaking the design so they didn't want to show renderings today, but it's 95% of the way there (according to their VP of Auxiliary Services). I thought there'd be fancy renderings today too but at least they're moving shovels in March.

 

http://rapidgrowthmedia.com/devnews/msubiomedicalcenter.aspx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought $3M was for demolition only? Seems like $3M for demo and a 6 story building is awfully low. 

 

That makes more sense. Per GRDad's reporting, the building will be 146,500 sqft. No way they're tearing down and building new for $20/sqft.  :thumbsup:

Edited by organsnyder
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guess I had it wrong. For some reason I thought they were weighing the option to build it themselves or have a developer build it as part of a much bigger development and lease it back.

Interesting that they are looking for development east of the new building. Not that it would be even close to contiguous but I was envisioning MSU going all the way up Michigan (sans roads).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Press did a little more digging and got the architects who will be involved: Ellenzweig who designed the Secchia Center and Smith Group JJR (I believe is a Detroit-based firm).

 

http://www.mlive.com/business/west-michigan/index.ssf/2014/12/msus_new_biomedical_research_b.html

 

http://www.ellenzweig.com/#

http://www.smithgroupjjr.com/projects


No parking structure under it?

 

The slideshow that was posted earlier (which is apparently not up-to-date) said it will have no basement. Showed a lot of bike storage in the various upper floors though. Wonder if they'll use spaces in the Secchia ramp for faculty and staff who don't bike?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Interesting how the research building will be 163,000 square feet, a little smaller than the GR Press building at 173,840 square feet. I thought it might have been a little bigger but maybe it was wishful thinking.

 

The initial information we saw was 36 research teams, and 5 stories. Now on their Brownfield application they're saying 44 research teams and $88 Million, so it may have grown to 6 floors.

 

$88 Million for 163,000 square feet will be a very nice facility. They don't build high-rise wet labs. :) You can't beat the impact though. Every mayor in the U.S. would love to get a biomedical campus in his/her downtown (if they don't have one already). Average salary of the 150 or so employees there: $90,000.

 

Probably similar to this in scale:

 

id44_image0.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Developments like this poke holes in the argument people have that Downtown is being over built in regard to apartments and condos.  44 research teams plus all of the additional staff needed to support the research teams and the building itself is a LOT of jobs, a lot of people that may want to live close to work, live downtown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, the mlive article still suggests that parcels will be reserved for private development -- thus the smaller building will have a much smaller footprint -- leaving room for something else. 

 

That was established quite some time ago, before the (4th) MLive article. ;)

 

msu_preliminary_2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Developments like this poke holes in the argument people have that Downtown is being over built in regard to apartments and condos.  44 research teams plus all of the additional staff needed to support the research teams and the building itself is a LOT of jobs, a lot of people that may want to live close to work, live downtown.

 

I agree Dave. Between MSU and Spectrum alone, there are a lot more people working downtown who may want to live close to work (some may choose EGR or FH but not all). Plus GVSU is expanding downtown, again. Class A office space is reaching 90% occupancy. At some point a few projects may hit the skids (like Icon did) but that's the nature of business. And even Icon has a waiting list as an apartment building.

 

The biggest challenge is hitting that middle rung apartment rent. New construction commands higher rents, and many of the rehab buildings that could sustain a little lower rent rates are getting snatched up (or are mostly gone downtown). We may see old warehouses and buildings further out become renovation targets, like along Godfrey or Burton Heights.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree Dave. Between MSU and Spectrum alone, there are a lot more people working downtown who may want to live close to work (some may choose EGR or FH but not all). Plus GVSU is expanding downtown, again. Class A office space is reaching 90% occupancy. At some point a few projects may hit the skids (like Icon did) but that's the nature of business. And even Icon has a waiting list as an apartment building.

 

The biggest challenge is hitting that middle rung apartment rent. New construction commands higher rents, and many of the rehab buildings that could sustain a little lower rent rates are getting snatched up (or are mostly gone downtown). We may see old warehouses and buildings further out become renovation targets, like along Godfrey or Burton Heights.

Jeff,

I know of several developers right now looking at Burton Heights in the Division/Burton corridor.  There is a HUGE potential here with the Silver Line in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.