Jump to content

234 Market Mixed-Use Project


EastownLeo

Recommended Posts


  • 2 weeks later...
  • GRDadof3 changed the title to 234 Market, former Lady Godiva's
13 hours ago, ironyisadeadscene said:

5 floors? That's it?

That's what it says from the applicant. I thought they were going 9 but maybe the numbers don't work. It has a YUGE amount of retail compared to most projects downtown though, and onsite parking. Could be exciting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
11 minutes ago, urbanland said:

14055206_234_Market1.jpg

Swooning. This reminds me of a lot of simple mixed use projects in others cities I enjoy. That corner anchor almost implies a grocery type component with the people and their bags...I also like the bike share looking situation going on, though I'd like it more if they weren't on the sidewalk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, GVSUChris said:

Swooning. This reminds me of a lot of simple mixed use projects in others cities I enjoy. That corner anchor almost implies a grocery type component with the people and their bags...I also like the bike share looking situation going on, though I'd like it more if they weren't on the sidewalk.

Plus, 234 Market...the address already provides a name for the store.  =)  Looks great!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, RegalTDP said:

This is the side facing the corner of Market & Bartlett?

:thumbsup:

Yes, it appears so. Me likey!  #gamechanger

(yes I hashtagged on urbanplanet)

I like the curvaciousness of it. With a few extra tweaks you could almost pick up an art modern vibe. 

GregoryLof_146_pic_5602.jpg

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, ironyisadeadscene said:

Only if x99 likes it

I don't hate it.  But it is boring and entirely mediocre, once you get over the fact that it's "new".   But, hey, It's Integrated.  What did you expect? Their designs often leave me feeling like someone set out to design what could have been a very nice building, and then got caught up in the "feature of the week."  It's as if they have someone sitting in their back office who says "Let's design the most boring building possible, and then try to juice it up with some real crazy s--t that makes no sense at all!"  It looks like some forgettable piece of suburban schlock that belongs on a three acre parcel on the Beltline.  At least it could easily be fixed.  The building GRDad posted, OTOH, now that's how you detail a building in this general style, while still keeping it very simple.  It makes it quite clear what this design lacks:  Visual interest that isn't kitsch.  Because that glass protuberance is dopey, if you didn't get my drift before.  So is endlessly stacking up bricks and cutting and cutting square holes in them.  Oooh wow!  What talent!  It has a curved wall!  Meh.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's an infill structure going into an area that has been a wasteland for decades. Its main goal is to look presentable and to nail the ground floor so that people will actually start being in that part of the DT area. That is the important thing. Needless ornamentation for ornamentation sake is worthless if the basics are neglected. It just isnt the current architectural style, and it adds far too much to the cost.

I honestly like the casual simplicity of it. It looks so inviting. Fill in market from Fulton to Wealthy with these and things will really change for the better in that part of town.

I guess I'm just not sure what is an example of what should be there.

 

 

Edited by GR_Urbanist
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, x99 said:

I don't hate it.  But it is boring and entirely mediocre, once you get over the fact that it's "new".   But, hey, It's Integrated.  What did you expect? Their designs often leave me feeling like someone set out to design what could have been a very nice building, and then got caught up in the "feature of the week."  It's as if they have someone sitting in their back office who says "Let's design the most boring building possible, and then try to juice it up with some real crazy s--t that makes no sense at all!"  It looks like some forgettable piece of suburban schlock that belongs on a three acre parcel on the Beltline.  At least it could easily be fixed.  The building GRDad posted, OTOH, now that's how you detail a building in this general style, while still keeping it very simple.  It makes it quite clear what this design lacks:  Visual interest that isn't kitsch.  Because that glass protuberance is dopey, if you didn't get my drift before.  So is endlessly stacking up bricks and cutting and cutting square holes in them.  Oooh wow!  What talent!  It has a curved wall!  Meh.

You remind me of that episode of the Simpsons where Homer becomes a food critic and hates everything.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, x99 said:

I don't hate it.  But it is boring and entirely mediocre, once you get over the fact that it's "new".   But, hey, It's Integrated.  What did you expect? Their designs often leave me feeling like someone set out to design what could have been a very nice building, and then got caught up in the "feature of the week."  It's as if they have someone sitting in their back office who says "Let's design the most boring building possible, and then try to juice it up with some real crazy s--t that makes no sense at all!"  It looks like some forgettable piece of suburban schlock that belongs on a three acre parcel on the Beltline.  At least it could easily be fixed.  The building GRDad posted, OTOH, now that's how you detail a building in this general style, while still keeping it very simple.  It makes it quite clear what this design lacks:  Visual interest that isn't kitsch.  Because that glass protuberance is dopey, if you didn't get my drift before.  So is endlessly stacking up bricks and cutting and cutting square holes in them.  Oooh wow!  What talent!  It has a curved wall!  Meh.

I think they could have at least thrown in some purple neon.  For old times' sake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • GRDadof3 changed the title to 234 Market Mixed-Use Project

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.