Jump to content

The Transportation and Mass Transit Megathread


TopTenn

Recommended Posts

As far as population is concerned, I disagree with the idea it can't be clean because NYC is so crowded. Part of that may be due to its age, but there are plenty of cities in other developed countries that have much cleaner subways than NYC's. We can't make too many excuses for how filthy some of our public services are. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


20 hours ago, timmay143 said:

Not Nashville  but transportation related.  I thought it was a fun video with a cool perspective.  I've never been to NY or Chicago except the airports.

 

Why is it so slow? I have never seen a subway that slow 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Dale said:

It’s NYC. Welcome to the Third World.

 

Don't you mean welcome to the center of international capitalism?  There are over 400,000 people in NYC with incomes over $1,000,000 per year.  And about 1/2 the population lives at or near the poverty line.  It's where we're all headed.

A big part of the subway's problem is that the city doesn't control it, it is entirely under control of the state government which doesn't care and only sees NYC as a source of revenue.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Neigeville2 said:

Don't you mean welcome to the center of international capitalism?  There are over 400,000 people in NYC with incomes over $1,000,000 per year.  And about 1/2 the population lives at or near the poverty line.  It's where we're all headed.

A big part of the subway's problem is that the city doesn't control it, it is entirely under control of the state government which doesn't care and only sees NYC as a source of revenue.  

There is great wealth and opulence in Caracas too ...

https://harpers.org/archive/2018/07/the-death-of-new-york-city-gentrification/

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/29/2018 at 2:09 PM, Dale said:

As an aside: two northern neighbors of Nashville that are doing very well without rail of any sort: Indy and Columbus. Both are glowing and growing (and on Amazon’s shortlist) and are nowhere near being crippled by traffic congestion. At last check, Indy had the shortest commute time in the nation, 22 minutes during rush hour.

We certainly have plenty of peer cities in the US that treat mass transit as an afterthought (although it's worth mentioning that Indianapolis and Columbus both seem to be well along on BRT with dedicated ROW). So as long as we stop at our current size, this shows that everything will be fine. On the other hand, cities that are a decade or three ahead of us in growth (Houston, Dallas, Atlanta, etc.) are all scrambling belatedly to get real mass transit in place because their interstates are hopelessly bogged down in traffic.

I get that some people aren't into rail because they're opposed to too much government. But calling people fetishists so you can write off their view isn't going to change basic geometry. Cities with millions of people don't have room for everyone to bring a car with them for every single trip around town. Cities our size that ignore that fact end up spending enormous amounts of money and wasting huge areas of land on giant road projects and enormous parking facilities, all in pursuit of a transportation network that's just going to keep bogging down worse and worse with every additional resident. And in return they end up with an urban landscape that's a lot less pleasant to actually live in. If too many people in Nashville are triggered by rail in particular, I hope we can at least get serious about some of the other options that are able to move more people around in less space.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Neigeville2 said:

Don't you mean welcome to the center of international capitalism?  There are over 400,000 people in NYC with incomes over $1,000,000 per year.  And about 1/2 the population lives at or near the poverty line.  It's where we're all headed.

A big part of the subway's problem is that the city doesn't control it, it is entirely under control of the state government which doesn't care and only sees NYC as a source of revenue.  

Yeah Dale claiming NYC is third world mind set is lol. NYC is dog eat dog, the very essence of capitalism. Political filters make some people see exactly what they want. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, samsonh said:

Yeah Dale claiming NYC is third world mind set is lol. NYC is dog eat dog, the very essence of capitalism. Political filters make some people see exactly what they want. 

 

1 hour ago, GreenHillsBoy said:

I can't even.....

Apparently, you can’t. 

2 hours ago, samsonh said:

Yeah Dale claiming NYC is third world mind set is lol. NYC is dog eat dog, the very essence of capitalism. Political filters make some people see exactly what they want. 

I hear that they’re eating dogs in Venezuela.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AronG said:

We certainly have plenty of peer cities in the US that treat mass transit as an afterthought (although it's worth mentioning that Indianapolis and Columbus both seem to be well along on BRT with dedicated ROW). So as long as we stop at our current size, this shows that everything will be fine. On the other hand, cities that are a decade or three ahead of us in growth (Houston, Dallas, Atlanta, etc.) are all scrambling belatedly to get real mass transit in place because their interstates are hopelessly bogged down in traffic.

I get that some people aren't into rail because they're opposed to too much government. But calling people fetishists so you can write off their view isn't going to change basic geometry. Cities with millions of people don't have room for everyone to bring a car with them for every single trip around town. Cities our size that ignore that fact end up spending enormous amounts of money and wasting huge areas of land on giant road projects and enormous parking facilities, all in pursuit of a transportation network that's just going to keep bogging down worse and worse with every additional resident. And in return they end up with an urban landscape that's a lot less pleasant to actually live in. If too many people in Nashville are triggered by rail in particular, I hope we can at least get serious about some of the other options that are able to move more people around in less space.

Interestingly, light rail advocates typically backtrack and concede that light rail does not reduce congestion, but that it does achieve the two-fold objective of providing alternative transit and also stimulating development. 

Columbus’ BRT is not strictly BRT. It looks like BRT, but only has dedicated lanes in the CBD. I don’t think Houston-like congestion there is inevitable because it is constantly striving to improve what it already has - a flexible bus system. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.