Jump to content

The Transportation and Mass Transit Megathread


TopTenn

Recommended Posts


1 hour ago, NissanvilleTitans said:

 

I try not to think about TDOT at all. Driving around the state makes me so mad. Why do we need a four lane road between Maynardville and Tazewell (you've probably never even heard of them)? So that the 2 cars that travel through there can pass each other? 

While a drive down i75 (not sure if tdot is responsible for it) is so congested, you can't ever get up to the speed limit.

I can't stand it. Put the money where it needs to go. As PaulChinetti says: make use of raised light rail. The metro areas NEED it. Earl and Ethel driving from Newport to Greenville can wait to pass each other later.

 

Funny thing is Earl and Ethel don’t drive pass 35 , takes them an hour to go to the local dollar general 😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PruneTracy said:

Understand too a lot of these roads were specifically determined by legislature, particularly the four-lane divided roads that connect county seats (Maynardsville and Tazewell are the county seats of Union and Claiborne Counties, respectively). State Route 111 from Cookeville to Chattanooga (the empty road to Fall Creek Falls State Park) was mandated by legislation.

But yet Hwy 231 remains a two lane , from Lebanon to Murfreesboro! As I said earlier in this tread , it’s all political. It’s what the legislature wants, not what’s needed. There’s no way in hell, that they need a 4 lane anywhere near Union or Claiborne Counties. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Luvemtall said:

But yet Hwy 231 remains a two lane , from Lebanon to Murfreesboro! As I said earlier in this tread , it’s all political. It’s what the legislature wants, not what’s needed. There’s no way in hell, that they need a 4 lane anywhere near Union or Claiborne Counties. 

Some of those US/TN highways are funded by Congress. There's something called the Appalachian Development Highway System that goes back decades so federal DOT has been providing funding for that through each State's DOT as well. Not sure if this particular 4 lane is included or not but wouldn't be surprised. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a good point, and one which has required certain roads built in certain location, such as the bypass (US64) around Cleveland, TN. I believe "Corridor J" from US27 to TN111 is also a product of the APD program. I wonder if it's still necessary, but that is a federal program. I'm only somewhat familiar with the roads in this part of the state and not sure there are any in Middle Tennessee. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, PaulChinetti said:

I was thinking the same thing this summer driving to Fall Creek Falls, It's a gigantic road through the middle of nowhere. 

The upkeep on those roads has to be massive out in the middle of nowhere.

If you're referring to Hwy 111, thanks to the ARC's, Appalachian  Regional Commission, Cooridor J and its partnership with the state of Tennessee; we have a great roadway from Kentucky through the Upper Cumberland to Chattanooga linking the area to Lexington, Atlanta and beyond.  Not all that long ago, it was proposed to become I175...however not likely to happen in the next generation or two...if ever.

2 hours ago, lmc123 said:

Some of those US/TN highways are funded by Congress. There's something called the Appalachian Development Highway System that goes back decades so federal DOT has been providing funding for that through each State's DOT as well. Not sure if this particular 4 lane is included or not but wouldn't be surprised. 

It is part of Corridor J; Tennessee's link to the ARC's ADHS system....a federal and state partnership to spur econcomic development in the states making up the Appalachian region.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MLBrumby said:

That's a good point, and one which has required certain roads built in certain location, such as the bypass (US64) around Cleveland, TN. I believe "Corridor J" from US27 to TN111 is also a product of the APD program. I wonder if it's still necessary, but that is a federal program. I'm only somewhat familiar with the roads in this part of the state and not sure there are any in Middle Tennessee. 

The ARC's defined region include the easternmost counties from Middle Tennessee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny that this popped up on WSMV.

https://www.wsmv.com/2022/12/02/tennessee-drivers-react-tdots-proposed-paid-express-lanes/

Really too bad, but drivers are going to have to get use to pay to drive. I do not really like tolls but I do see the need. I took the Florida Turnpike from Ocala to Ft Lauderdale, however it was still a Charlie Foxtrot if you know what I mean through Orlando. A real mess during rush hour and Nashville has nothing on Orlando as fas as traffic.

I think I can continue the turnpike further south to Homestead as I have to check the map, but I 95 is still a total Cluster even with the toll lanes. The majority of old timers in this state have no idea how good they have it compared to other states. If Tennessee wants to have state of the art highways, then they are going to have to get creative as far as funding. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/2/2022 at 8:39 AM, NissanvilleTitans said:

I try not to think about TDOT at all. Driving around the state makes me so mad. Why do we need a four lane road between Maynardville and Tazewell (you've probably never even heard of them)? So that the 2 cars that travel through there can pass each other? 

While a drive down i75 (not sure if tdot is responsible for it) is so congested, you can't ever get up to the speed limit.

I can't stand it. Put the money where it needs to go. As PaulChinetti says: make use of raised light rail. The metro areas NEED it. Earl and Ethel driving from Newport to Greenville can wait to pass each other later.

Is this Tazewell road a currently planned widening?  Highway 33 is a state road ,so TDOT is certainly involved.  However, the bridges over the lakes look fairly modern and are not steel truss span old fashioned ones at  all.  Widening them would be very expensive I would think.  As to I75, The recent Chatanooga  rework has really helped.  Generally, I have had no trouble at all exceeding the speed limit on it from GA to VA.  Only at rush hours have  there have been backups and slowdown from my experience.  While light rail would be great, the costs are immense compaired to widening existing largely rural roads.  The money spent on the Tazwell widening would be a pittance compared to obtaining R.O.W. and construction in Metros.  If I had ONE project in TN that I would like to see IMO more critical than Lightrail, it would be vastly widening I40 from east of Monteagle mountain into Chatanooga, especially the last few miles by the Tennessee River.

Edited by Baronakim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/3/2022 at 9:44 AM, Baronakim said:

Is this Tazewell road a currently planned widening?  Highway 33 is a state road ,so TDOT is certainly involved.  However, the bridges over the lakes look fairly modern and are not steel truss span old fashioned ones at  all.  Widening them would be very expensive I would think.

They will probably just twin the bridge over Norris Lake. I'd be more worried about the ridge gaps they are traversing, if I remember correctly there are two decent ones on SR 33 on the way to Tazewell.

One more note about rural East Tennessee. The problem TDOT has, or the state in general, is that there are a ton of decently-sized cities spread out over a large area with only one/two Interstates traversing the area. We don't have this problem in Middle Tennessee because virtually all of our large cities are near an Interstate that was already going to/through Nashville (partially because the presence of the Interstates caused the cities to grow), and West Tennessee is much less densely-populated. Part of this is because of what you might say is poor regional planning, as the state/cities attracted various industries that now rely on a haphazard roadway network to move goods. Or maybe blame TVA for that. But it was like that before the region industrialized, and the terrain doesn't help very much either.

The point being, there is a lot more volume on these rural roadways than you might realize, and a significant portion of it is commercial traffic. SR 33 from Maynardsville to Tazewell is running up to 12,000 vehicles per day which is getting tight for a two-lane road, much less one with steep grades and a number of cross streets / driveways.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/2/2022 at 9:39 AM, NissanvilleTitans said:

I try not to think about TDOT at all. Driving around the state makes me so mad. Why do we need a four lane road between Maynardville and Tazewell (you've probably never even heard of them)? So that the 2 cars that travel through there can pass each other? 

While a drive down i75 (not sure if tdot is responsible for it) is so congested, you can't ever get up to the speed limit.

I can't stand it. Put the money where it needs to go. As PaulChinetti says: make use of raised light rail. The metro areas NEED it. Earl and Ethel driving from Newport to Greenville can wait to pass each other later.

Wait until you think about the widening and straightening projects on Highway 13 between Linden and Lobelville in Perry County...the least densely populated county in the state, and one of the least densely populated areas east of the Mississippi. Or the four-laning of 13 five miles south of Wavelry, not even getting close to connecting it to I-40 with 4-lanes. Millions spent on an almost complete rebuild of large stretches of lightly travelled roadway where the simple addition of a couple of passing lanes would have sufficed, effectively nothing more than poorly conceived, planned, and executed vanity projects. Ostensibly it was to encourage development and boost the local manufacturing economy, but it's frankly too little, too late for that to be of any real impact.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another tidbit, there's no bridges that connects from East Nashville to Briley. The area east of the Cumberland River is in a need of a few connecting points. The only access points from East Nashville to Briley is the Gallatin Pike S interchange.   The Eastern part of Nashville in general has terrible connecting points with Wilson County, excluding I40 and Lebanon Pike. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess historically there was a ferry at McGavock. For better or worse, I don't think there's a good spot for a bridge these days. McGavock seems like the most obvious place but the local residents would (fairly, in my opinion) surely raise hell at the idea.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.