Sign in to follow this  
walker

RFP - 201 Market

Recommended Posts

walker    171

So here we go again.  City is asking for RFQs from developers for 201 Market.  I wonder if they're just fishing or someone is interested:

 

 RFQ 201 Market

EDIT: I see GVSUChris beat me to this by a few minutes over in the Lady Godiva thread.

Edited by walker
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


MJLO    342

Seems like odd timing as it looks like developer conditions are about to enter a lull.  I know there's no where to park, but there really needs to be another major job source downtown other than Spectrum(i.e. corporate headquarters) , if it's ever truly going to get to that next level.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GRLaker    248
5 hours ago, MJLO said:

Seems like odd timing as it looks like developer conditions are about to enter a lull.  I know there's no where to park, but there really needs to be another major job source downtown other than Spectrum(i.e. corporate headquarters) , if it's ever truly going to get to that next level.

Agreed. It doesn't appear that the big companies are willing to leave their tax friendly suburban locations either. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
organsnyder    172
2 hours ago, ant33 said:

Is this the huge parking on the sw corner of Fulton & Market?

Parking lot*

That parking lot is owned by the Amway Grand Plaza. I've got to imagine that they have plans for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
joeDowntown    664
15 hours ago, MJLO said:

Seems like odd timing as it looks like developer conditions are about to enter a lull.  I know there's no where to park, but there really needs to be another major job source downtown other than Spectrum(i.e. corporate headquarters) , if it's ever truly going to get to that next level.

On the flip side, maybe a large plot of land on the riverfront will open up talks that wouldn't occur in normal market conditions/downtown investment?

Joe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
whitemice    3

I have not heard of this "lull" of which you speak.  The economic forecasts I read point to a slowing of multi-unit residential development;  read "SLOWING" not "LULL"/"STOP".  This site clearly has some special attributes - we'll see what happens.  That slowing is also relative to what has been a frenzied build out.

Edited by whitemice
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MJLO    342
49 minutes ago, whitemice said:

I have not heard of this "lull" of which you speak.  The economic forecasts I read point to a slowing of multi-unit residential development;  read "SLOWING" not "LULL"/"STOP".  This site clearly has some special attributes - we'll see what happens.  That slowing is also relative to what has been a frenzied build out.

The context in which I was using the word "lull" was indicitive of a slowdown, not a stop.  A lot of the fuel that propelled the last 3-4 years of growth has been tapped.  The office market which was hot in 2014-15 has slowed, and apartments are about to hit a saturation point.  That's not a doom and gloom prediction, more something that has been observed as new projects have started to slow, or not come to fruition.  People will move into all of the new units built downtown and demand will reignite.  But in terms of retail, the next level of mass transit, and overall vibe, Grand Rapids will not hit that next level until there is another shot in the arm of people who have to be downtown.   The biggest thing the city lacks in comparison to the cities it's trying to be like, is the presence of not even one corporate headquarters.  Grand Rapids has 4 Fortune 500 sized companies in the area.  All of them are growing, all of them are firmly entrenched in the suburbs.  It would be amazing if the city could some how incentivize a big one to move in from outside of the region.  Even one of the big companies headquartered in one of the smaller cities in the state (i.e. Dow, Kellogg, Whirlpool)  I know it'd never happen, but it's nice to have wishful thinking sometimes :) .  Especially a progressive company like Kellogg that only stays in Battle Creek because of it's legacy, but is held back in recruiting because of the not as attractiveness of it's locale.  

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GRDadof3    1833
2 hours ago, whitemice said:

I have not heard of this "lull" of which you speak.  The economic forecasts I read point to a slowing of multi-unit residential development;  read "SLOWING" not "LULL"/"STOP".  This site clearly has some special attributes - we'll see what happens.  That slowing is also relative to what has been a frenzied build out.

I've noticed a lull in new project announcements. Anything sizable, that is. The last one I believe was Hinman, which was 7 or 8 months ago. 

So anything that would go on 201 Market would have to be a speculative project. Same with the property by MSU. If companies were chomping at the bit to get downtown, it seems like something would've been announced there already. The other possible uses are hotels, which we seem to have a lot of those in the works, and residential, which we also seem to have a lot in the works. 

But that one developer, Bergler I believe was his name? He expressed interest in the 201 site a while ago. Didn't he have a plan laid out? 

Ah yeah, here it is:

https://mibiz.com/news/real-estate/item/21797-park-it-elsewhere-developer-asks-gr-to-reconsider-parking-lot-along-grand-river

It seems to me that the city usually puts out an RFQ when someone expresses an interest in a city-owned property, so it doesn't look like they're playing favorites. They may even have to do it by law. So my guess is that someone's already interested in it. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wingbert    490

This would be a great place for a vertical mall, some towers for office and residential customers, and even a hydrogen power plant.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MJLO    342
9 minutes ago, wingbert said:

This would be a great place for a vertical mall, some towers for office and residential customers, and even a hydrogen power plant.

It think you're right.  Do you think this will pull Suzanne Geha out of retirement?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GRDadof3    1833
31 minutes ago, wingbert said:

This would be a great place for a vertical mall, some towers for office and residential customers, and even a hydrogen power plant.

And it shall be named, Buckhead of the North. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
joeDowntown    664
1 hour ago, wingbert said:

This would be a great place for a vertical mall, some towers for office and residential customers, and even a hydrogen power plant.

From leaked images I heard it looks something like this. Notice the UFO. It includes an alien spaceport. The new administration is still trying to figure out if real aliens can be detained at the border. Could be a deal breaker for this project. LOL

 

IMG_4045.JPG

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RegalTDP    267
1 hour ago, joeDowntown said:

From leaked images I heard it looks something like this. Notice the UFO. It includes an alien spaceport. The new administration is still trying to figure out if real aliens can be detained at the border. Could be a deal breaker for this project. LOL

 

IMG_4045.JPG

Just from looking at it I can tell it's 100% shovel ready.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quercus    44

I'm looking forward to seeing what this RFQ produces since this area is one of 15 "opportunity sites" identified in the the GR Forward Plan.

201 Market Bird's Eye.png

This could be a great demonstration of flood wall removal and improved access to The Grand. Is the concrete pad under the east side of the RR bridge used for emergency personnel boat access? If one of the goals is to make this section of river navigable, does that mean the swinging RR bridge will finally be put to use? :D

GR-Fwd-Fig-2.23-201-Market-Street-Concept-Option-B.jpg

GR-Fwd-Fig-A1.11-201-Market-Street-aerial-view.jpg

GR-Fwd-Fig-A1.1-201-Market-Street-Birdseye-view.jpg

My vote is to leave the island untouched.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GRDadof3    1833
On 2/18/2017 at 0:11 PM, Quercus said:

I'm looking forward to seeing what this RFQ produces since this area is one of 15 "opportunity sites" identified in the the GR Forward Plan.

201 Market Bird's Eye.png

This could be a great demonstration of flood wall removal and improved access to The Grand. Is the concrete pad under the east side of the RR bridge used for emergency personnel boat access? If one of the goals is to make this section of river navigable, does that mean the swinging RR bridge will finally be put to use? :D

GR-Fwd-Fig-2.23-201-Market-Street-Concept-Option-B.jpg

GR-Fwd-Fig-A1.11-201-Market-Street-aerial-view.jpg

GR-Fwd-Fig-A1.1-201-Market-Street-Birdseye-view.jpg

My vote is to leave the island untouched.

Is that railroad line going to be vacated for sure? 

That's an interesting document too. I hadn't seen that before (I know, hard to believe ;) )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EastownLeo    140

That island gets fully covered in water most winters after thaw. A "park" would get washed away. Its pretty much a sandbar with trees on it. I do not think much could be done with it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quercus    44

I haven't heard anything about the RR line being vacated. I believe someone on here said it's still in use by Amtrak as the route between the station and overnight storage. Plus, that bridge and line will be important for commuter rail to the lake shore...someday ^_^

I too feel maintaining a park on that island would be difficult. It would probably end up being more concrete than sand. Plus, I kind of like the thought of kayakers having a little destination to explore that's not accessible without a boat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
walker    171
1 hour ago, EastownLeo said:

That island gets fully covered in water most winters after thaw. A "park" would get washed away. Its pretty much a sandbar with trees on it. I do not think much could be done with it.

 

There were three islands at one time and this is the last remnant I believe of island three.  Indians lived on the islands in the summer.  Speaking of flooding, Charles Belknap, of Belknap Hill fame, mentioned the annual flooding when he wrote of what the islands had looked like when he was a boy in the 1850’s.  I posted this quote in a slightly different context several years ago:

. . . even then the three islands were almost without a blemish. Indians never built a fire at the foot of a tree and the high water flooded the islands each year washed them free of all refuse of their camps. The heavy covering of grass and plants prevented washing of the soil. The prevailing west winds wafted the odors of the trees and flowers over the village.

May not an old man today be forgiven for a longing that this beautiful playground of his boyhood might have been spared for his great-grandchildren? Only men of deep thinking can tell you how long nature was in creating and clothing these islands, but any school boy with a piece of chalk can figure how long man was in obliterating the last traces of them.

 

Seems like there might be a chance to restore this last trace as part of the river restoration.  Maybe there should be a marker on the island or the adjacent shore (above the high water mark of course) with Belknap’s thoughts.

 

Belknap wrote a series of columns for the Grand Rapids Press back in the nineteen-twenties.  They were collected and published as a book called The Yesterdays of Grand Rapids.  The link points to the short chapter called “The Islands” from which I excerpted the above quote: 

http://archive.org/stream/yesterdaysofgran00belk#page/128/mode/2up

Surprisingly the book is still in print.

53 minutes ago, Quercus said:

I too feel maintaining a park on that island would be difficult. It would probably end up being more concrete than sand. Plus, I kind of like the thought of kayakers having a little destination to explore that's not accessible without a boat.

Well, it would have to be designed with the flooding in mind, Riverside Park floods many years too.

Edited by walker
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GRDadof3    1833

Kind of like the "island" along the river by Baker Furniture Company and that railroad bridge, I think it serves as a "tent city" for homeless people. Any park/greenspace that can't occasionally be patrolled by police is a magnet for illicit behavior. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.