Jump to content

Charlotte area population statistics


Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, tozmervo said:

I can't wait until that thing is at the end of it's life and it's demolished. 

Unfortunately, that will not happen in this century. :(

I've stayed at the property for a retreat. The foundation work is over-engineered to allow for the building to stand with simple upkeep.

The only way I see it coming down, is if someone buys it out and takes it down, but because of the condo side, with many owner, I do not see that as an easy task either!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


2 hours ago, C85 said:
1 Charlotte † 889,019 731,424 +21.55% City Mecklenburg
2 Raleigh †† 485,679 403,892 +20.25% City Wake (seat), Durham
3 Greensboro † 292,265 269,666 +8.38% City Guilford
4 Durham † 279,501 228,330 +22.41% City Durham (seat), WakeOrange
5 Winston-Salem † 247,222 229,618 +7.67% City Forsyth
6 Fayetteville † 208,254 200,564 +3.83% City Cumberland
7 Cary 170,330 135,234 +25.95% Town WakeChatham
8 Wilmington † 123,432 106,476 +15.92% City New Hanover
9 High Point 113,791 104,371 +9.03% City GuilfordRandolphDavidsonForsyth
10 Concord † 96,635 79,066 +22.22% City Cabarrus
11 Greenville † 93,184 84,554 +10.21% City Pitt
12 Asheville † 91,587 85,712 +6.85% City Buncombe
13 Gastonia † 76,593 71,741 +6.76% City Gaston
14 Jacksonville † 66,479 70,145 −5.23% City Onslow
15 Chapel Hill 59,862 57,233 +4.59% Town OrangeDurham
16 Huntersville 56,212 46,773 +20.18% Town Mecklenburg
17 Rocky Mount 54,523 57,477 −5.14% City EdgecombeNash
18 Burlington 53,077 49,963 +6.23% City Alamance
19 Apex 50,451 37,476 +34.62% Town Wake
20 Wilson † 49,348 49,167 +0.37% City Wilson
21 Kannapolis 48,806 42,625 +14.50% City CabarrusRowan
22 Wake Forest 42,269 30,117 +40.35% Town Wake

Link-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_municipalities_in_North_Carolina#

2019 population estimates.

At this pace, Charlotte cracks 1 million in 6 years.  We surpass Jacksonville in 5.

 

 

Edited by MACyr
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, CLT704 said:

^By the looks of it, we've overtaken Indianapolis so are the 16th largest city in the country.

 

 

EDIT: where is the data from? I couldn't find a source for the wiki page or another site I corroborated the numbers with. 

Wiki page- type list of municipalities in North Carolina

Other websites- I don't know.

 

Edited by C85
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Estimated 2019 Pop. and Density of 10 Largest N.C. / S.C.  Cities

1. Charlotte                   889,019          429.34/sq. mile            1,121/sq.km

2. Raleigh                        485,679          499.23/sq. mile            1,293/sq.km

3. Greensboro              292,265           338.99/sq. mile               878/sq.km

4. Durham                       279,501           377.61/sq. mile               978/sq.km

5. Winston-Salem      247,222           277.99/sq. mile               720/sq.km

6. Fayetteville              208,254            210.04/sq. mile               544/sq.km

7. Cary                              170,330            449.42/sq. mile          1,164/sq.km

8. Charleston                140,178            191.51/sq. mile              496/sq.km    

9. Columbia                   135,299            149.42/sq. mile               387/sq.km

10. Wilmington           123,432            448.65/sq. mile           1,162/sq.km         

Link:  http://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities/

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^ I have always felt Raleigh was a lot more dense in population they have a lot of apartments and many more townhome projects than we have had.   Cary being an expensive suburb continues that.  Wilmington where I am today has a lot more patio homes and homes on small lots due to the lack of available non wetland land in the city.  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, KJHburg said:

^^^ I have always felt Raleigh was a lot more dense in population they have a lot of apartments and many more townhome projects than we have had.   Cary being an expensive suburb continues that.  Wilmington where I am today has a lot more patio homes and homes on small lots due to the lack of available non wetland land in the city.  

Raleigh is a tricky apples-to-apples comparison because of city boundaries. Wake County vs Meck County would probably yield almost identical density. (...too lazy to do the math)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Charlottes core is more dense than raleigh if Charlotte had around 150 sq miles of land it would have more people than raleigh. I would say the core of Charlotte is 3750 ppsm - 4500 ppsm.

Wake Density - 1200 ppsm

Meck Density - 1950 ppsm 

People think that Raleigh is more dense than Charlotte but in reality its not. Think about all that undeveloped land all around the western part of I-485. I think it would be close to impossible to plop down that huge amazon distribution center in the 150 sq mile core.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, tozmervo said:

Raleigh is a tricky apples-to-apples comparison because of city boundaries. Wake County vs Meck County would probably yield almost identical density. (...too lazy to do the math)

 

2 hours ago, C85 said:

Charlottes core is more dense than raleigh if Charlotte had around 150 sq miles of land it would have more people than raleigh. I would say the core of Charlotte is 3750 ppsm - 4500 ppsm.

Wake Density - 1200 ppsm

Meck Density - 1950 ppsm 

People think that Raleigh is more dense than Charlotte but in reality its not. Think about all that undeveloped land all around the western part of I-485. I think it would be close to impossible to plop down that huge amazon distribution center in the 150 sq mile core.

Comparison of Wake & Mecklenburg Counties  -  Population,  Area,  and Density (as of 07/01/2017)

Wake                     Pop.:  1,072,203       Area:  857 sq.mi.       Density:  1,253/sq.mi.  (484 sq.km)

Mecklenburg    Pop.:  1,076,837       Area:  546 sq. mi.      Density:   2,013/sq.mi.  (777.2 sq.km)  

U.S. Census Bureau, American Fact Finder, County Population Totals and Components of Change: 2010-2017

Link:  https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I understand and empathize with the desire to keep development in the NC mountains low, let's not forget that the great majority of our highland provinces (I'd say 95% or more) remain *extraordinarily* rural in character. Just go up the Parkway through Avery County or west of Asheville into the Great Balsam Mountains and one will see that there is no shortage of pristine areas in our coldest biomes.  There is not that much danger of eradicating any of  those, and there is comparitively less area where the high country strikes that balance of "resort" and "wilderness".
I'm not trying to be an apologist for reckless development in the mountains but I *will* say that there's a certain beauty in areas that are built up to be a responsible swirl of ridgelines and rock-rich  planned homes and businesses, and if anyone thinks our state's mountains are imperiled by  urban renewal I distinctly recall the worse conditions of Manitou Springs in CO when I went on a roadtrip a few summers ago. We could be doing SO much worse at preserving our vertical forests... Many western oases of development are essentially Gatlinburg with more snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A major issue with development in the Triangle is the water supply system. Durham and Wake are quite close to the head of the watershed. See here and compare to Charlotte. Far greater resources in Western NC

http://www.carolana.com/NC/Transportation/nc_watersheds.html

Piping from outlying counties may help but is always fraught.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/11/2019 at 6:02 PM, tozmervo said:

Raleigh is a tricky apples-to-apples comparison because of city boundaries. Wake County vs Meck County would probably yield almost identical density. (...too lazy to do the math)

Tozmervo,  you were probably thinking in terms of urbanized area in which case I would agree with you. 

Edited by Seaboard Fellow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/11/2019 at 4:01 PM, QCxpat said:

Estimated 2019 Pop. and Density of 10 Largest N.C. / S.C.  Cities

1. Charlotte                   889,019          429.34/sq. mile            1,121/sq.km

2. Raleigh                        485,679          499.23/sq. mile            1,293/sq.km

3. Greensboro              292,265           338.99/sq. mile               878/sq.km

4. Durham                       279,501           377.61/sq. mile               978/sq.km

5. Winston-Salem      247,222           277.99/sq. mile               720/sq.km

6. Fayetteville              208,254            210.04/sq. mile               544/sq.km

7. Cary                              170,330            449.42/sq. mile          1,164/sq.km

8. Charleston                140,178            191.51/sq. mile              496/sq.km    

9. Columbia                   135,299            149.42/sq. mile               387/sq.km

10. Wilmington           123,432            448.65/sq. mile           1,162/sq.km         

Link:  http://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities/

Wait these population densities don't make sense even according to the data given. Cary with a larger area and a smaller pop than Greensboro should not also have higher density than it, ditto on a few of the other cities

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, QCxpat said:

Cary is smaller in land area than Greensboro.   Cary's land area = 58.33 sq. miles.   Greensboro's land area = 126.5 sq. miles.  The figures in the chart above show total pop. in the 1st column,  pop. density per square mile in the 2nd column, and pop. density per square kilometer in the 3rd column.  Here are the land areas for the 10 largest cities in NC and SC, in both square miles and square kilometers

Charlotte                  305.4 sq.mi. / 790.98 sq.km.

Raleigh                       142.8 sq.mi.  / 369.85 sq.km.

Greensboro             126.5 sq.mi.  / 327,63 sq. km.

Durham                     107.4 sq.mi. /  278.16 sq.km.

Winston-Salem     132.4 sq.mi. / 342.91 sq.km.

Fayetteville             145.9 sq.mi. / 377.88 sq.km.

Cary                                 58.33 sq.mi. / 151,97 sq.km.

Charleston               109 sq.mi. / 282.31 sq.km.

Columbia                  132.2 sq.mi. / 342.39 sq.km.

Wilmington                 41 sq.mi. / 106.19 sq.km.

Hope this helps :)

Today was the day I forgot how to read a chart, sorry I see now. I was reading it as pop, then area, then density. Thanks for the clarification though

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.