Jump to content

Charlotte area population statistics


Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, kayman said:

I've been told by several US Census employees off the record that this whole 2020 census count was trash and botched by political meddling (by the Trump administration). The methodologies chose for the statistical designations from urban areas to metropolitan statistical areas and consolidated statistical areas were to make something of this botched data. If anything you all should be extremely skeptical about this data. Also they even admitted the paid demographic data held by the private sector used for advertisers and commercial users will be much more accurate than this decennial count.

 

There’s no way in hell that those numbers are accurate for Charlotte.  Think of the thousands upon thousands of apartments that have been built over the past 10 years in uptown, SouthEnd, plaza, etc. come on. There’s no way!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


9 hours ago, Temeteron said:

There’s no way in hell that those numbers are accurate for Charlotte.  Think of the thousands upon thousands of apartments that have been built over the past 10 years in uptown, SouthEnd, plaza, etc. come on. There’s no way!

I knew something was wrong when black Americans and several non-white demographics mysteriously disappeared from growing black cities and counties across the South including Charlotte,  Atlanta, Houston,  and Washington (DC).  It had nothing to do with that racial and ethnic reclassification was changed. There are clear signs of political meddling in the numbers and demography by Stephen Miller in the Trump admin. This was well documented by several reputable publications. 

Here's my professional take of true population approximations:

Charlotte urban area is approximately 1.5M in total population; demographics are as follows (51% white, 26% black, 7% Asian, 1% Native/Indigenous/Pacific Islander, 13% multiracial/two or more races, 2% other; 14% Hispanic/Latino/Spanish speaking population) 

City of Charlotte is likely around 900K-915K in municipal population; demographics are as follows (40% white, 39% black, 7% Asian, 3% Native/Indigenous/Pacific Islander, 1% other, 9% multiracial/two or more races; 15% Hispanic/Latino/Spanish speaking population)

Of course, we probably won't be able to verify these numbers until the 2030 US Census decennial count.

Edited by kayman
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kayman said:

I knew something was wrong when black Americans and several non-white demographics mysteriously disappeared from growing black cities and counties across the South including Charlotte,  Atlanta, Houston,  and Washington (DC).  It had nothing to do with that racial and ethnic reclassification changed. There are clear signs of political meddling in the numbers and demography by Stephen Miller in the Trump admin. This was well documented by several reputable publications. 

Here's my professional take of true population approximations:

Charlotte urban area is approximately 1.5M in total population; demographics are as follows (51% white, 26% black, 7% Asian, 1% Native/Indigenous/Pacific Islander, 13% multiracial/two or more races, 2% other; 14% Hispanic/Latino/Spanish speaking population) 

City of Charlotte is likely around 900K-915K in municipal population; demographics are as follows (40% white, 39% black, 7% Asian, 3% Native/Indigenous/Pacific Islander, 1% other, 9% multiracial/two or more races; 15% Hispanic/Latino/Spanish speaking population)

Of course, we probably won't be able to verify these numbers until the 2030 US Census decennial count.

I’d say the Hispanic population is higher. Probably 16-17%

Edited by Temeteron
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Temeteron said:

I’d say the Hispanic population is higher. Probably 16-17%

I would agree with that figure for all of the Charlotte MSA and CSA because Cabarrus' Hispanic/Spanish-speaking population is exploding in growth. Especially when it comes to those of Puerto Rican & Dominican origins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Temeteron said:

There’s no way in hell that those numbers are accurate for Charlotte.  Think of the thousands upon thousands of apartments that have been built over the past 10 years in uptown, SouthEnd, plaza, etc. come on. There’s no way!

The Charlotte Urban Area's boundaries shrunk under the new definitions of an urban area that required greater housing / structural density. As a result, the sliver that connected Statesville to the Charlotte portion of the Urban Area is now too low density. That sliver is now "rural" between Mooresville and Statesville and Statesville became a separate urban area, immediately impacting the Charlotte urban area by 39,849 people shifting into a separate urban area. On the South Carolina side of the border, the Charlotte urban area lost most of the Fort Mill and Indian Land suburbs to the Rock Hill urban area, which went from 104,996 people in 2010 to 218,443 in 2020 as its boundaries grew. Wadesboro is also now considered a separate urban area, rather than part of Charlotte's (4,903 person impact)

So long story short, while the core of Mecklenburg County has been growing, the sprawl and low density around us cut several areas off from the Charlotte urban area or shifted them to entirely net new urban areas as our sprawling suburbs are "not continuous enough" at high density. This cut them off from our core Charlotte urban area. This offsets some of the population gains in areas like South End, Plaza, et... as we lost areas like Statesville and fast growing Fort Mill being considered part of "Urban Charlotte."

Edited by CLT2014
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Temeteron said:

There’s no way in hell that those numbers are accurate for Charlotte.  Think of the thousands upon thousands of apartments that have been built over the past 10 years in uptown, SouthEnd, plaza, etc. come on. There’s no way!

I don't think they're inaccurate [yet]. SouthEnd & Uptown's entire population is about 27,000 - 30,000ish. One thing I see so far is that Statesville has been taken out of Charlotte's Urban Area and became it's own urban area. Statesville's UA population now is 39,829. [I can tell because on the new list of data, it had Statesville, NC as an urban area]

Rock Hill went from 118,631 to 218,443. So Maybe it stole Fort Mill & Tega Cay from Charlotte? Some of those deletions from Charlotte's urban area could easily wipe out growth in uptown, southend, plaza. But I don't think they released the map of Urban Areas yet - I think it'll be a couple months - so it's hard to tell what exactly the UA of Charlotte is now.

The map below is the old Urban Area boundaries.

image.png.67a704b0856e5283f0f390d7cd409356.png

 

Otherwise, I do agree completely about the MSA and CSA undercounts, particularly of minority areas.

 

Edit: What CLT2014 said :P

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by AirNostrumMAD
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^Yes, shrinking boundaries of the Charlotte Urban Area were the main impact offsetting population. In 2010 the Charlotte Urban Area was 741  square miles and in 2020 it is only 657 square miles, about a -12.8% reduction in land area to either a rural classification or different urban areas (Statesville, Wadesboro, and losing some of the South Carolina suburbs to Rock Hill's urban area that went from 95 square miles in 2010 to 145 square miles in 2020). 

The maps will come out next year showing what territory is no longer dense enough to be considered continuous with Charlotte.

When comparing to Raleigh, their boundaries grew from 2010 to 2020 from 518 square miles to 554 square miles. Their suburban areas like Cary and Apex tend to be a bit more dense (still suburban, but smaller lots) than ours in Indian Land, Fort Mill, et... to form more continuous structural density. 

Edited by CLT2014
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/9/2022 at 11:01 AM, KJHburg said:

Back to NC these 50 counties have the most native born NC residents.  Of course Meck and most close in ring counties are not on the list but Anson is #3 most NC county so to speak.  Rowan and Catawba are the only other 2 in our regions anywhere on this list. 

https://www.cbs17.com/news/north-carolina-news/counties-with-the-most-born-and-bred-residents-in-nc/

Gaston, Cleveland, Rutherford, Stanley, Burke are all on the list and are all in our region. They are at least all in the Charlotte TV market.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Given the methodology involved in assembling this chart (small sample size, self-selection of Linkdin users, odds that a Linkdin user changes their profile following a move, etc.) its certainly flawed but it suggests Charlotte is doing pretty well with professional worker relocations. Better than Raleigh and Denver! (but less than Jacksonville???, 50% less than Nashville?  1/3 the rate of growth of Austin...)

Chart aside, everyone needs to be prepared for declining Charlotte growth rates (anything north of 1% per year will be great news) since national growth rates have been declining for a while and national population change (natural increase and net immigration) is just about 0%.

 

Image

Edited by kermit
  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
3 hours ago, kayman said:

Screenshot_20230225_205820_Chrome.thumb.jpg.a0dba58f979681ef65fd65eca08bfd95.jpg

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/living/article272162667.html

Looks like Charlotte has been officially designated a black mecca like Atlanta, Washington, and Houston. I've said that for a while now. However, everyone else is started to say these things aloud more frequently.

This is also why I have a very hard time believing the drop in black population in Mecklenburg County.  I predict by 2030 Mecklenburg, Cabarrus, Gaston, Lancaster,  Rowan, and York counties are the metro counties with black populations between 20-40% respectively. 

Hopefully the black migration to North Carolina will finally tip the political scales of state politics in the upcoming decade 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/26/2023 at 12:40 AM, DCMetroRaleigh said:

Hopefully the black migration to North Carolina will finally tip the political scales of state politics in the upcoming decade 

Agreed, it needs to change so the urban areas get their fair share of influence of state policymaking that helps them rather than hurt them. It's all up to the NC Democrats stop hyperfocusing on only the Triangle and Eastern NC when it comes to black progressive influence and representation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/8/2023 at 9:42 AM, kermit said:

Given the methodology involved in assembling this chart (small sample size, self-selection of Linkdin users, odds that a Linkdin user changes their profile following a move, etc.) its certainly flawed but it suggests Charlotte is doing pretty well with professional worker relocations. Better than Raleigh and Denver! (but less than Jacksonville???, 50% less than Nashville?  1/3 the rate of growth of Austin...)

Chart aside, everyone needs to be prepared for declining Charlotte growth rates (anything north of 1% per year will be great news) since national growth rates have been declining for a while and national population change (natural increase and net immigration) is just about 0%.

 

Image

But I thought everyone was leaving California!!!:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This shows US Post Office Residential and Business change of addresses in the last 4 years across NC and shows what areas are growing and what areas are not.  But remember it includes businesses and residential service.

https://abc11.com/north-carolina-population-growth-moving-to-the-suburbs/12890180/

and yes California is losing population 500,000 people in the last 2 years.

https://therealdeal.com/la/2023/02/16/californialost-500k-residents-in-first-two-years-of-pandemic/

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/27/2023 at 9:44 PM, KJHburg said:

This shows US Post Office Residential and Business change of addresses in the last 4 years across NC and shows what areas are growing and what areas are not.  But remember it includes businesses and residential service.

https://abc11.com/north-carolina-population-growth-moving-to-the-suburbs/12890180/

and yes California is losing population 500,000 people in the last 2 years.

https://therealdeal.com/la/2023/02/16/californialost-500k-residents-in-first-two-years-of-pandemic/

From the link, Charlotte specifically:
78F2432F-36E9-4D6A-A200-697E77601F03.thumb.jpeg.6cc224b4d22d23565ea60040db598098.jpeg
 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 12/30/2022 at 11:19 AM, AirNostrumMAD said:

I don't think they're inaccurate [yet]. SouthEnd & Uptown's entire population is about 27,000 - 30,000ish. One thing I see so far is that Statesville has been taken out of Charlotte's Urban Area and became it's own urban area. Statesville's UA population now is 39,829. [I can tell because on the new list of data, it had Statesville, NC as an urban area]

Rock Hill went from 118,631 to 218,443. So Maybe it stole Fort Mill & Tega Cay from Charlotte? Some of those deletions from Charlotte's urban area could easily wipe out growth in uptown, southend, plaza. But I don't think they released the map of Urban Areas yet - I think it'll be a couple months - so it's hard to tell what exactly the UA of Charlotte is now.

The map below is the old Urban Area boundaries.

image.png.67a704b0856e5283f0f390d7cd409356.png

 

Otherwise, I do agree completely about the MSA and CSA undercounts, particularly of minority areas.

 

Edit: What CLT2014 said :P

 

 

 

 

 

Interesting; I wasn't aware that Charlotte's UA was reconstructed under the new criteria. I always thought Statesville should be separate, seeing as how it dangles as an appendage from the Huntersville/Cornelius/Mooresville cluster (which looks like it could be its own UA too). But all in all, it's the Catawba River and Lake Wylie (and nearby industrial land usage for the airport and Duke Energy) that prevent Gastonia and Fort Mill/Rock Hill from being completely contiguous with Charlotte's UA. 

In any case, this is why I believe urban agglomerations is a better way of assessing the full urbanized area of a place, which is basically a main urbanized area plus its surrounding UAs that are reasonably contiguous to it. For Charlotte that would include at minimum Concord, Gastonia, and Fort Mill/Rock Hill. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/20/2023 at 2:37 AM, krazeeboi said:

Interesting; I wasn't aware that Charlotte's UA was reconstructed under the new criteria. I always thought Statesville should be separate, seeing as how it dangles as an appendage from the Huntersville/Cornelius/Mooresville cluster (which looks like it could be its own UA too). But all in all, it's the Catawba River and Lake Wylie (and nearby industrial land usage for the airport and Duke Energy) that prevent Gastonia and Fort Mill/Rock Hill from being completely contiguous with Charlotte's UA. 

In any case, this is why I believe urban agglomerations is a better way of assessing the full urbanized area of a place, which is basically a main urbanized area plus its surrounding UAs that are reasonably contiguous to it. For Charlotte that would include at minimum Concord, Gastonia, and Fort Mill/Rock Hill. 

The current Census criteria for urban areas are a mess at best.

Statesville is definitely apart of the Charlotte urban area.  The amount of residential density starting to connect Troutman to Statesville is already there today. 

The reasons why Gastonia and Charlotte urban areas are separated is because of three flawed criteria not the industrial development nor the Airport since they both actually contribute to the urban density.  Anything east of the South Fork of the Catawba near Cramerton is towards Charlotte. Tbh, Gastonia, Concord, and Rock Hill urban areas are all consolidated with the main Charlotte urban area. However, for political reasons they all are going to remain separated until after the 2030 Census count. Hickory urban area will be the only one not connected to the Charlotte urban area even after 2030. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/22/2023 at 10:18 PM, kayman said:

The current Census criteria for urban areas are a mess at best.

Statesville is definitely apart of the Charlotte urban area.  The amount of residential density starting to connect Troutman to Statesville is already there today. 

The reasons why Gastonia and Charlotte urban areas are separated is because of three flawed criteria not the industrial development nor the Airport since they both actually contribute to the urban density.  Anything east of the South Fork of the Catawba near Cramerton is towards Charlotte. Tbh, Gastonia, Concord, and Rock Hill urban areas are all consolidated with the main Charlotte urban area. However, for political reasons they all are going to remain separated until after the 2030 Census count. Hickory urban area will be the only one not connected to the Charlotte urban area even after 2030. 

Note that I said those water and land features prevent the Gastonia and Rock Hill UAs from being completely contiguous with Charlotte's, not from being completely folded into Charlotte's. The longstanding rule for UAs has been that once designated as such, it remains as such regardless of how much it grows into a neighboring larger UA. The only exception is when it falls beneath the population/density UA thresholds, in which case an immediately neighboring UA with which it is sufficiently contiguous can absorb it. That may have been among the recent changes to the criteria also but I'm not sure.

As the county seat of a historically fairly industrious county, I'm somewhat surprised Statesville wasn't already an independent UA. I'm guessing it was probably an urban cluster at some point in the past before Charlotte's northern exurban tentacles got ahold of it. The same was probably true of Monroe also.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/26/2023 at 1:10 PM, krazeeboi said:

As the county seat of a historically fairly industrious county, I'm somewhat surprised Statesville wasn't already an independent UA. I'm guessing it was probably an urban cluster at some point in the past before Charlotte's northern exurban tentacles got ahold of it. The same was probably true of Monroe also.

Statesville may be the historic and political center of Iredell, but you can be sure the economic and population engine is Mooresville, hands-down. The cross-county-line commuting between Mooresville and Mecklenburg county is probably a huge percentage of the working population there.  (I have also known plenty of Statesville folks that commute to Mecklenburg)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, tozmervo said:

Statesville may be the historic and political center of Iredell, but you can be sure the economic and population engine is Mooresville, hands-down. The cross-county-line commuting between Mooresville and Mecklenburg county is probably a huge percentage of the working population there.  (I have also known plenty of Statesville folks that commute to Mecklenburg)

Oh I'm aware of that; NASCAR, Lowe's, and proximity to Lake Norman have been really good to Mooresville in the postwar era. But Statesville used to lead the state in tobacco production in an earlier era which is primarily why I made the statement that I did.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/26/2023 at 1:10 PM, krazeeboi said:

Note that I said those water and land features prevent the Gastonia and Rock Hill UAs from being completely contiguous with Charlotte's, not from being completely folded into Charlotte's. The longstanding rule for UAs has been that once designated as such, it remains as such regardless of how much it grows into a neighboring larger UA. The only exception is when it falls beneath the population/density UA thresholds, in which case an immediately neighboring UA with which it is sufficiently contiguous can absorb it. That may have been among the recent changes to the criteria also but I'm not sure.

As the county seat of a historically fairly industrious county, I'm somewhat surprised Statesville wasn't already an independent UA. I'm guessing it was probably an urban cluster at some point in the past before Charlotte's northern exurban tentacles got ahold of it. The same was probably true of Monroe also.

Urban area mergers can occur based on commuting patterns due to economic and social interactions between two UAs. 

Differences between the Final 2020 Census Urban Area Criteria and the 2010 Census Urban Area Criteria - Census.gov https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/reference/ua/Census_UA_CritDiff_2010_2020.pdf

Edited by kayman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, QCxpat said:

Today's CBJ  -  "Lancaster, Lincoln counties see fastest population growth in Charlotte metro, per new Census estimates" by Jenna Martin

I did not realize that all of Lincoln County development has a minimum lot size of 1 acre until listening to today's Charlotte Talks and that Lancaster County has a new UDO.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.