westsider28

The Commons at Pine (UCB-anchored mixed-use)

6 posts in this topic

Posted (edited)

United Community Bank is planning to anchor a mixed-use development on 1.7 acres on the Southeast corner of Main and Pine (Sub Station, Simple Simon, etc).  It would be a 19,000+ sq ft L-shaped building, 2-stories along Pine, 1 tall story along Main, spaces for office/retail, and 100 parking spaces behind.  The developer is Greenville-based Centennial American Properties (they're behind the huge Camperdown project in Greenville).  Construction could start late this year. 

This must be the project that was briefly on a DRB agenda a few months ago, before being pulled.  This could be the catalyst for really cleaning up that corner (motels, etc).  Exciting!

597b79fc3dec5_Main-PineUCB1.jpg.838164a4fa7a66e6a06b2880a2669d23.jpg

Edit: Here's the UBJ story on the project.  And I agree with roads-scholar below; I meant the whole intersection. :good:

Edited by westsider28
Added info

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


38 minutes ago, westsider28 said:

United Community Bank is planning to anchor a mixed-use development on 1.7 acres on the Southeast corner of Main and Pine (Sub Station, Simple Simon, etc).  It would be a 19,000+ sq ft L-shaped building, 2-stories along Pine, 1 tall story along Main, spaces for office/retail, and 100 parking spaces behind.  The developer is Greenville-based Centennial American Properties (they're behind the huge Camperdown project in Greenville).  Construction could start late this year. 

This must be the project that was briefly on a DRB agenda a few months ago, before being pulled.  This could be the catalyst for really cleaning up that corner (motels, etc).  Exciting!

597b79fc3dec5_Main-PineUCB1.jpg.838164a4fa7a66e6a06b2880a2669d23.jpg

I see this as not only the catalyst for cleaning up the SE corner but the SW corner, the NE corner, and the NW corner. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have some concerns about the urban design and streetscape, but overall its a great project. I think its a testament to the higher standard that form-based codes results in.

My main concern is the sidewalk and planting strip area. They seem to be backwards. It's great to have retail facing the street, but they need to have enough room outside to set up an outdoor seating area. Under no circumstances when you have that much space should there be sidewalk at the back of curb AND a small sidewalk adjacent to the building. 

For the record, I love landscaping, but in a more urban context it needs to be in planters and tree wells with generally more space dedicated to pedestrians.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

That's great news.  All 4 corners of that intersection need to be improved.  I'm surprised that something like this hasn't already happened.

I wonder if the Bell South building and tower will come down too.

Edited by Spartanburg Guy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Spartan I agree that the sidewalk design needs some work.  I'm sure the DRB will address that.  I'm also hoping the City considers some streetscaping improvements in the area (the whole East Main block from Pine to St John could really use it).

@Spartanburg Guy The AT&T building isn't part of this project. I actually think it's a relatively nice looking building (circa 1946 according to GIS), and it has some good height. It's AT&T's main communications hub for the area (every city has a building like it), and it also contains Spartanburg County 911.  So it won't be going anywhere for a LONG time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was at the DRB meeting.  This project was sent back to the drawing board due to issues with the building face line on East Main (not close enough to the site line & change in depth of the building halfway along the face) and an issue with consistent materials on the ends of the building (particularly on Pine) where the first floor was brick & 2nd floor EIFS (design not cohesive).  Here's the updated site plan (better than the initial renderings) and the updated Pine facade that were presented.

Edit: H-J article - http://www.goupstate.com/news/20170816/design-plans-for-mixed-use-project-sent-back-for-changes

IMG_7633.thumb.JPG.f808bc166c9bc838d6b9fa9f81ada131.JPG

IMG_7634.thumb.JPG.465234ea40bdec98dfb02800fae523f2.JPG

I found it a bit ridiculous that someone on the development team seemed to get a bit angry over this.  I got the feeling he was expecting approval to be a formality.  Um, it's the DRB's job to challenge you on stuff that doesn't conform and you to figure it out.  He mentioned "economic" stuff, like adding more brick instead of EIFS was going to make the project unfeasible.  Rubbed me the wrong way.

Edited by westsider28
Added H-J article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.