Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thanks @LA_TN for that refresher on the process.   I think I knew parts of that at the time, but not the whole story.      Agree lots of lessons to be learned.    The biggest takeaway is that for a prominent downtown location (or arguably for any city-owned property), the Metro Arts Commission should retain approval rights over the final design, and any changes to the design.    Why would you ever give an artist a pot of money and carte blanche to place whatever they want in such a location?      

btw, your description of the unanticipated physics and downsizing brings to mind the classic Stonehenge scene 

 

This Is Spinal Tap (1984)

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


3 hours ago, steelkid247 said:

apologies if i missed this, but does this building have a name/website yet?  curious if they have started advertising units and would love to find out more about their amenities 

The actual name is 805 Lea, but I haven't been able to locate an official website yet.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.