Jump to content

CATS Long Term Transit Plan - Silver, Red Lines


monsoon

Recommended Posts


I’m I wrong in thinking that the city should prioritize a Silver Line spur out east along Albemarle Road, versus expanding the light rail into Union or further in Gaston beyond Belmont? Not that I’m against the latter, it just seems like an overlooked corridor that should be strongly considered, especially since the current Route 9 has one of the highest ridership numbers in the system. The region also has plans of submitting to the upcoming STIP for upgrading Albemarle Road from Central to I-485. Seems like a good opportunity to work with the NCDOT to preserve ROW along the the middle of the road for future rail. 
 

Same deal with a spur to SouthPark or maybe even a Blue Line spur off onto South Tryon, out to Ayrsley and Rivergate in Steele Creek. I personally think BRT should be considered first for US 74 in Gaston from Belmont to Gastonia, and BRT from CPCC in Matthews to Monroe for Union County along US 74. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Third Strike said:

prioritize a Silver Line spur out east along Albemarle Road

That would be really great. Could provide a park and ride lot out near 485, upgrade to a deck or two once the north end blue line decks are hitting capacity.  It could also connect to the Gold line at Albemarle and Central - providing a good connection further east for residents along the Central corridor. 

What about later on having service along Albemarle Rd to Sharon Amity and Sharon Rd, to Southpark, then on to intersect the Blue line at Tyvola.  That would link Eastland, Cotswold and Southpark areas, as well as linking SW/W and E Charlotte  to jobs in those areas in addition to uptown. Likely would face a good bit of political opposition on that route though. And very spendy property acquisition. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can someone explain this statement from the WBTV article in the link below?  

"A spokesperson for CATS says the airport planning is final because 'the Federal Aviation Administration’s height restrictions along flight paths limit the alignment’s ability to enter the terminal directly'.”

https://www.wbtv.com/2019/11/21/former-cats-ceo-criticizes-route-chosen-lynx-silver-line/

How do height restrictions affect a rail pathway that's on the ground?  Or is the suggestion that building the rail to the airport would perhaps require bridges that would exceed the FAA height limit?  Or maybe would require the use of cranes?  I'm just not understanding the statement.  Whatever they do, they're going to have to make it super easy to transfer from the Silver Line station to the "airport conveyance."  And that conveyance must be along a direct route dedicated only to this conveyance with no interaction with traffic because if people, for example, have to get on a bus and that bus gets caught up in airport traffic, then that totally defeats the purpose of using the Silver Line to get to the airport.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I seem to recall that LA ran into a similar issue when planning their Green Line in the 1990s IIRC (it might have been some other city so, I can't remember). It could be an elevated guideway that could be in the way, or it could be the overhead catenary system.

I agree though that the airport better not be cheap and simply use a slow dinky shuttle bus connecting the terminal to the station, which could impact ridership. An APM operating in its own ROW is the only way to go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the Boring Company has started tunneling on the Las Vegas Convention Center People Mover.  This is a 0.8 mile 3 stop line at $52.5 million. If we extrapolate that cost to the  20 mile Silver line from the airport to Matthews that's right at $1 billion.  Lets double that to allow for vehicle purchases and cost over runs.  That's still less than the Blue Line, and it would be automated with higher frequency.  That's damned tempting to advocate for. 

On 11/20/2019 at 8:46 AM, Third Strike said:

I’m I wrong in thinking that the city should prioritize a Silver Line spur out east along Albemarle Road, versus expanding the light rail into Union or further in Gaston beyond Belmont? Not that I’m against the latter, it just seems like an overlooked corridor that should be strongly considered, especially since the current Route 9 has one of the highest ridership numbers in the system. The region also has plans of submitting to the upcoming STIP for upgrading Albemarle Road from Central to I-485. Seems like a good opportunity to work with the NCDOT to preserve ROW along the the middle of the road for future rail. 

The City should yes, but regionally I'm not sure that's the best approach. 

I think I would rather see commuter rail to Gaston County, as opposed to light rail to there.  I think the NCRR should seriously consider working with NS to see if they could relocate the main line to the south side of Gastonia and preserve some ROW for Charlotte-Atlanta HSR , opening up the current NS main line for heavy commuter rail which would still allow for access to NS customers currently on the main line.  Theoretically this could allow the elimination of the Gastonia HSR station as well as Gastonia residents would have multiple ways to get to the Charlotte Douglas station.  I'm not sure I would advocate for that, but it would be a possibility.  

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I-77 Express Lanes Are open along the Full Length Although some Construction will linger on for the next 6 to 8 Months I’m sure.  Does anyone know where CATS is currently on the BRT Option for the RedLine?  Obviously - The Lightrail Option to the North is dead on arrival and I remember there being a BRT Option floating around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Houston which has terrible traffic but the one of the largest express bus system in the country.  They have these huge park and ride lots with shelters and then people board the buses which fly down the express lanes to downtown.  As that Agenda story pointed out we can not neglect our bus system service as it is not feasible possible to serve all areas with rail.  

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/20/2019 at 8:46 AM, Third Strike said:

I’m I wrong in thinking that the city should prioritize a Silver Line spur out east along Albemarle Road, versus expanding the light rail into Union or further in Gaston beyond Belmont? Not that I’m against the latter, it just seems like an overlooked corridor that should be strongly considered, especially since the current Route 9 has one of the highest ridership numbers in the system. The region also has plans of submitting to the upcoming STIP for upgrading Albemarle Road from Central to I-485. Seems like a good opportunity to work with the NCDOT to preserve ROW along the the middle of the road for future rail. 
 

Same deal with a spur to SouthPark or maybe even a Blue Line spur off onto South Tryon, out to Ayrsley and Rivergate in Steele Creek. I personally think BRT should be considered first for US 74 in Gaston from Belmont to Gastonia, and BRT from CPCC in Matthews to Monroe for Union County along US 74. 

I concur a spur along Albemarle Rd that terminated at Eastland and later at I-485 would be a great investment in transportation infrastructure in East Charlotte. Eastland would be a prime spot for TOD with connections to the Silver Line spur and Gold Line.  Especially if both lines were buried at Eastland to maximize development potential. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Washington Post holds up Charlotte's floodplain home buyout  process as a shining  example of how cities can adapt to climate change. While that isn't directly relevant to this thread it did mention how the buyout program is funded, and what makes it flexible enough to be a success -- its funding from the impervious surfaces fee paid by residents to Charlotte Water. This sort of compensatory funding model would certainly be a boon for transit and walkability, a parking tax is the first option that comes to my mind...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-solutions/2019/11/26/one-citys-plan-combat-climate-change-bulldoze-homes-rebuild-paradise/

a bonus from the article was this comment:

Quote

I rarely comment, but the by-line (lede, whatever), the caption of the photo, headline, all neglected to mention what state this Charlotte was in. I had to read til the fourth paragraph to infer they were talking about Charlotte, NC.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-solutions/2019/11/26/one-citys-plan-combat-climate-change-bulldoze-homes-rebuild-paradise/?outputType=comment&commentId=2839da07-7c67-4951-b000-9f84c9f0b08f

Edited by kermit
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, kermit said:

The Washington Post holds up Charlotte's floodplain home buyout  process as a shining  example of how cities can adapt to climate change. While that isn't directly relevant to this thread it did mention how the buyout program is funded -- through our impervious surfaces fee paid to Charlotte Water. This sort of funding model would certainly be a boon for transit and walkability, a parking tax comes to mind....

https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-solutions/2019/11/26/one-citys-plan-combat-climate-change-bulldoze-homes-rebuild-paradise/

a bonus from the article was this comment:

followed by this one:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-solutions/2019/11/26/one-citys-plan-combat-climate-change-bulldoze-homes-rebuild-paradise/?outputType=comment&commentId=2839da07-7c67-4951-b000-9f84c9f0b08f

Good article.  :lol: at the last picture

Seriously, this is a very good policy.  I think of it a lot walking around Sugar Creek Greenway wondering what homes may be next.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, tarhoosier said:

KJ, how could you forget Dallas NC? County seat of Gaston County for 75 years.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dallas,_North_Carolina

When someone says Denver to me I think of east Lincoln county.   I am close to Georgia and had it on my mind but who can forget the Little D over near G-town. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, KJHburg said:

the Washington Post views Charlotte as a national city and has for many years.  Might have started around DNC or maybe before.  Plus as the largest city between Atlanta and DC most people there have heard of it.  Those comments under that story were funny.  Perhaps we should always refer to Dallas as Dallas TX since there is a Dallas GA or Atlanta as Atlanta GA as there is an Atlanta Michigan.   Charlotte is the only large city over 25,000 people with that name anywhere in the country.    I guess the media will rediscover the village of Charlotte next summer! (and they will be stunned and in shock and awe if they have not been here)  

The Washington Post’s big city treatment of Charlotte is largely a factor of it being a nearby regional neighbor.  It seems every other person in the DMV has North Carolina connections. Geography matters. The Boston Globe, LA Times, and Miami Herald Dont treat Charlotte with the same type of familiarity as WaPo. 

Comment about how here in the Mid-Atlantic, people know Charlotte And Raleigh as a regional neighbor.  But the concern is based on the fact the WaPo is an international paper with readers far beyond the MidAtlantic. 
 

1 day ago
 
AP used to have a rule about when you mentioned the state... Here in the mid-Atlantic, you might think everyone knows it's Charlotte North Carolina but someone in Oklahoma or Washington State may not make that assumption. 
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, XRZ.ME said:

In Nov MTC meeting minutes,

Capture.JPG.1ae22a61f107642f7049facd884a8db0.JPG

The City will pay $50M to answer these questions, but here are my early answers (much /s):

*The dreaded weave of the 12th/Davidson/Caldwell needs redone anyhow. And no one would miss the Levine Deckapolis. The XCLT may be tight, but it should really go McDowell/7th instead of Central anyhow.

*Funny how CATS will blame Express Lanes when they are literally rebuilding the bridge as we speak. Maybe the endless construction will be a faint memory by the time this design exercise wraps up.

*Best hurry up for that joint development proposal. And check the fine print.

*That same NSRR will give a definitive answer in 3rd Ward but somehow not Lake Norman. Well, maybe sinking big money into a new football stadium helps.

*Oh right, that prior study was serious about skirting the hospital to be closer to walk-friendly downtown Matthews.  Sure you can't just follow ugly Independence the entire way?  Or rebuild even more of Monroe Road ala North Tryon?  Besides, Durham learned hospitals can be great partners.

*East Charlotte could surely sacrifice some older apartments. However, using Federal dollars makes targeting disproportionate pockets of minority households a bit tricky.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, southslider said:

The City will pay $50M to answer these questions, but here are my early answers (much /s):

*The dreaded weave of the 12th/Davidson/Caldwell needs redone anyhow. And no one would miss the Levine Deckapolis. The XCLT may be tight, but it should really go McDowell/7th instead of Central anyhow.

*Funny how CATS will blame Express Lanes when they are literally rebuilding the bridge as we speak. Maybe the endless construction will be a faint memory by the time this design exercise wraps up.

*Best hurry up for that joint development proposal. And check the fine print.

*That same NSRR will give a definitive answer in 3rd Ward but somehow not Lake Norman. Well, maybe sinking big money into a new football stadium helps.

*Oh right, that prior study was serious about skirting the hospital to be closer to walk-friendly downtown Matthews.  Sure you can't just follow ugly Independence the entire way?  Or rebuild even more of Monroe Road ala North Tryon?  Besides, Durham learned hospitals can be great partners.

*East Charlotte could surely sacrifice some older apartments. However, using Federal dollars makes targeting disproportionate pockets of minority households a bit tricky.

 

 

For Hawthorne Bridge, my understanding from the slide is CATS want to use express lane space for Silver line. So it actually runs below Hawthorne Bridge. No modification needed at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, XRZ.ME said:

For Hawthorne Bridge, my understanding from the slide is CATS want to use express lane space for Silver line. So it actually runs below Hawthorne Bridge. No modification needed at all. 

Hard to believe highway capacity will be sacrificed. And in the longested section without exits. Where paralleling congested Central and 7th.  A pinch point in multiple ways. 

If you believe converting motorist lanes for tracks will be easy, then I have a railyard north of Uptown ready for park conversion. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.