Jump to content

CATS Long Term Transit Plan - Silver, Red Lines


monsoon

Recommended Posts

On 5/27/2020 at 10:33 AM, Hushpuppy321 said:

Thanks for the info!  One issue that was mentioned in the DOLRT thread (Triangle UP) was the lack of/poor opportunity for TOD along the alignment.  Do you think with the SilverLine Alignment that was published a year or more ago, there’s sufficient opportunity for TOD along the East-West Route?  Looks like will be hemmed in pretty tightly between Independence Blvd & Plaza-Midwood so not much redevelopment opportunity in that space.

I think the Airport is really a substantial opportunity and I have a lot of hope for the Wilkenson corridor overall. I would hope Belmont and Mathews can both have some infill too, but not vere familiar with their cores.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


18 minutes ago, Desert Power said:

I think the Airport is really a substantial opportunity and I have a lot of hope for the Wilkenson corridor overall. I would hope Belmont and Mathews can both have some infill too, but not vere familiar with their cores.

I think the Belmont portion (Major Bridge crossing the Catawba) May be cut once we see the hefty price tag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Hushpuppy321 said:

I think the Belmont portion (Major Bridge crossing the Catawba) May be cut once we see the hefty price tag.

The bridge won’t be the problem, the state is rebuilding the Wilkinson bridge soon regardless of LRT and they have offered to build it to accommodate LRT. 

I am concerned about who will pay for the rail west of the airport. It about 5 miles from the airport stop to Belmont and very little of that track will be useful to Mecklenburg residents or developers,  so I doubt the MTC has much interest in paying for that track. I doubt Gaston wants to pay for all of those five miles either (that track (without the bridge) will cost hundreds of millions, basically for one useful stop).

Edited by kermit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kermit said:

The bridge won’t be the problem, the state is rebuilding the Wilkinson bridge soon regardless of LRT and they have offered to build it to accommodate LRT. 

I am concerned about who will pay for the rail west of the airport. It about 5 miles from the airport stop to Belmont and very little of that track will be useful to Mecklenburg residents or developers,  so I doubt the MTC has much interest in paying for that track. I doubt Gaston wants to pay for all of those five miles either (that track (without the bridge) will cost hundreds of millions, basically for one useful stop).

Definitely A lot of developable land in that area West of the Airport though.  It’d be nice if the City/CATS proposes that Value Capture Tax thing they’ve been floating for all properties adjacent to the Corridor.  I think they will have 2 Stops planned though Prior to Belmont.   One at 485 and another prior to crossing the Catawba.

Edited by Hushpuppy321
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, kermit said:

The bridge won’t be the problem, the state is rebuilding the Wilkinson bridge soon regardless of LRT and they have offered to build it to accommodate LRT. 

I am concerned about who will pay for the rail west of the airport. It about 5 miles from the airport stop to Belmont and very little of that track will be useful to Mecklenburg residents or developers,  so I doubt the MTC has much interest in paying for that track. I doubt Gaston wants to pay for all of those five miles either (that track (without the bridge) will cost hundreds of millions, basically for one useful stop).

Wouldn't there be some interest or need when Riverbend is built out?  One stop on the Meck side of the Catawba and 485 possibly?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd almost prefer commuter rail from Gastonia to the Airport, and then a transfer to light rail from the Airport to Uptown.  Keeps us from having to run short headway trains all the way out to Gastonia while still having the rail connection. Transfers aren't uncommon in other metros.

Edited by DH17
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
9 hours ago, kermit said:

Austin city council has approved a $10 billion transit plan, paid via property taxes, that will be voted on in November. It sounds like the plan is for three LRT lines and a commuter line (not sure if the commuter line is in addition to the currently operating one). The $10 billion is said to be an extra $360 per year In tax on the median house.

http://texasrailadvocates.org/2020/06/11/austin-city-capmetro-ok-10-billion-project-connect-three-light-rail-lines/

Good move to  guide the next 20+ years of their growth.   Not sure I like the $2.5B underground connector.  Great for connectivity (people w/ bags), but a risk re: retail, placemaking, activity of the streets above - and at a significant cost to tax payers.

Definitely solidifies the need to make Silver happen here.  

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Property taxes, especially in the form of Tax Increment Funding are potentially the better approach to infrastructure.    I believe it ought to be more comprehensive, such as adding X-amount of property tax for all infrastructure that feeds to that area.   People are uptight about property taxes, but infrastructure directly benefits property values.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Hushpuppy321 said:

Anyone think that Austin’s Referendum will go down in flames like Nashville?

quite possibly as Austin's property taxes are among the highest in Texas and TX property taxes are overall much higher than NC's.  Of course they have no state income tax.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/14/2020 at 12:30 AM, Hushpuppy321 said:

Anyone think that Austin’s Referendum will go down in flames like Nashville?

The Corona crises makes the vote really difficult to predict.

Nashville's stumbles were: 1) a plan that did not reach the bulk of voters in Davidson county (the LRT lines were mostly just in town); 2) it was an out of cycle election (in May) which had less than 30% turnout; 3)  the face of the referendum was involved in a sex scandal just before the vote; and 4) the koch brothers spent a ton of cash to encourage defeat. 

The Austin vote differs substantially from Nashville, assuming no sex scandal... I have not seen the specifics of the Austin plan, but hopefully they had enough sense to create a plan which touches most of the voters in Travis county.  The other big plus for the vote is it will be held in November, so the election will have a huge turnout (perhaps north of 60%). Turnout has always been a positive for transit referenda and will help to blunt the effects of any propaganda.

The Corona wildcard is a tough one to predict at the moment. Anti-urbanists really jumped on the virus as an opportunity to use the virus to say 'I told you cities were bad.' Fortunately we are now seeing evidence that transit is not an environment where much virus is spread https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/06/fear-transit-bad-cities/612979/   (also see infection rates in Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea and Singapore).  And unfortunately, we are starting to see that the virus becoming more of a rural and small town problem as an urban one. Hopefully people will become more rational in their analysis of evidence before November and they will see that cities and transit are still things worth paying for in the (post) Corona age

Ultimately I think the Austin vote will be about growth. If Austin residents believe their city will continue to grow post-virus, then they know that they have no choice other than paying for transit. Most homeowners want to see continued growth (and a way around traffic), and will be reluctant to assume growth has come to an end,  so I'll bet the tax will pass.

 

edit: I have seen my first map of the proposed system. At a glance the rail seems strangely parallel and does not appear to reach much of the county (but I do not know Austin at all)

 

 

Edited by kermit
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, kermit said:

The Corona crises makes the vote really difficult to predict.

Nashville's stumbles were: 1) a plan that did not reach the bulk of voters in Davidson county (the LRT lines were mostly just in town); 2) it was an out of cycle election (in May) which had less than 30% turnout; 3)  the face of the referendum was involved in a sex scandal just before the vote; and 4) the koch brothers spent a ton of cash to encourage defeat. 

The Austin vote differs substantially from Nashville, assuming no sex scandal... I have not seen the specifics of the Austin plan, but hopefully they had enough sense to create a plan which touches most of the voters in Travis county.  The other big plus for the vote is it will be held in November, so the election will have a huge turnout (perhaps north of 60%). Turnout has always been a positive for transit referenda and will help to blunt the effects of any propaganda.

The Corona wildcard is a tough one to predict at the moment. Anti-urbanists really jumped on the virus as an opportunity to use the virus to say 'I told you cities were bad.' Fortunately we are now seeing evidence that transit is not an environment where much virus is spread https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/06/fear-transit-bad-cities/612979/   (also see infection rates in Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea and Singapore).  And unfortunately, we are starting to see that the virus becoming more of a rural and small town problem as an urban one. Hopefully people will become more rational in their analysis of evidence before November and they will see that cities and transit are still things worth paying for in the (post) Corona age

Ultimately I think the Austin vote will be about growth. If Austin residents believe their city will continue to grow post-virus, then they know that they have no choice other than paying for transit. Most homeowners want to see continued growth (and a way around traffic), and will be reluctant to assume growth has come to an end,  so I'll bet the tax will pass.

 

edit: I have seen my first map of the proposed system. At a glance the rail seems strangely parallel and does not appear to reach much of the county (but I do not know Austin at all)

 

 

I think I see what you’re saying about the Proposed Lightrail Lines (Orange, Blue, Gold) in Austin.  They seem Planned to run largely parallel through Center City (North/South) then Branch off.  I guess that’ll keep costs down where they’re able to share Tracks.  Here’s a link to the proposed route map I found: https://capmetro.org/uploadedFiles/New2016/ProjectConnect/Maps/03_PCON_ServiceLevelMap_JUN2020_02.pdf

I believe that CATS Proposed Silverline here in Charlotte would be a very good way to cover Mecklenburg County from East to West.  Future Spurs coming off the Silver and Blue Lines would be cool too in the distant (2040+) future.

Edited by Hushpuppy321
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting report from JLL about post pandemic commuting and 34% polled who used transit in the past said they would seek other alternatives.  Obviously this has lots of implications and it will remained to be seen if it holds up. 

https://www.us.jll.com/content/dam/jll-com/documents/pdf/research/Post-Pandemic-Transit-and-Commuting-JLL.pdf

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/16/2020 at 3:12 PM, KJHburg said:

Interesting report from JLL about post pandemic commuting and 34% polled who used transit in the past said they would seek other alternatives.  Obviously this has lots of implications and it will remained to be seen if it holds up. 

https://www.us.jll.com/content/dam/jll-com/documents/pdf/research/Post-Pandemic-Transit-and-Commuting-JLL.pdf

Not unexpected.  I'd be curious to know where the majority of their survey was taken, i.e. what was the mix of respondents living in cities with traditional subways (underground) vs. those traveling on lightrail and streetcar (above). 

My sense is that the underground systems will have to fight hard to overcome the negative connotation that they are "dirty" places - with limited air circulation, scant opportunities to social distance, no virus killing natural light, etc.   

Whereas cities that depend on above ground rail (Charlotte) have the opportunity to highlight clean, new transit cars, the ability to wait in your own space, and plenty of open air throughout the journey.  

Side note:  this is why I'm not a huge fan of the $2.5B Austin below ground connector.  Would rather that money be spent on improving above ground public realm or to extend the lines.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mgelbach said:

I can absolutely say, as a millennial, I don't want to leave city living. Pre or post Covid, I live in southend right behind Flowerchild and just being able to walk everywhere to get a haircut, groceries, dinner is so convenient that I really don't think I could give it up.

 

If i ever do move it would be a block down to the pink building for a larger unit and those views.


Without my car, covid in DC is annoying. Though as things reopen, it’s getting better. I’m ready to see the normal crowds come back. 
 

During the pandemic and the. Riots, I did want to just move to Dulles or Reston or to South Charlotte/Ballantyne.

ill never move to rural areas, but wealthy suburbs with mixed use town-center developments (like Lake Norman; Birkdale and the various town centers) are starting to become more appealing and just drive into the city. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mgelbach said:

I can absolutely say, as a millennial, I don't want to leave city living. Pre or post Covid, I live in southend right behind Flowerchild and just being able to walk everywhere to get a haircut, groceries, dinner is so convenient that I really don't think I could give it up.

 

If i ever do move it would be a block down to the pink building for a larger unit and those views.

Have they renovated the Arlington (pink building) ?  That buildings seems to be a dinosaur compared to the rest of the buildings.  It’s interesting what perspective northeasterners have as they are used to old buildings so they don’t care.  But us southerners are snooty.  Anything more than 5 years old is too old lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am actually on the Metro right now as I write this. This train is relatively packed. It’s kinda awkward because the seats on the DC metro aren’t horizontal like on other subway systems, but rather like the Lynx where they are two by two. People don’t want to sit next to one another but there is only so much standing room. 
 

Anyways, one thing COVID has made me discover is the beauty of bicycling for short trips. This isn’t unique to any one city and probably others are “discovering” this as well. From my house near the NoMa station in DC I would frequently take the train to Dupont Circle station  (5 stops, 14 min ride). Once you add in the 5 minute walk time to the station and add maybe 3 minutes waiting for train, that’s a 23 minute trip. I can bike from by house to the Dupont Circle neighborhood in about 12 minutes. It’s all flat in bike lanes, and it’s a really pretty ride. 
 

I don’t know the bike lane infrastructure in Charlotte, but I could see a similar thing occurring from say trips from South Blvd to Uptown, maybe Uptown to NoDa, and Uptown to Central. I don’t know if the B-cycle sharing system has expanded in the past couple of years. 
 

I would argue that biking is now a much bigger competitor to transit than ride share services, at least for me. I’m sure I’m not the only one making that conclusion. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, LKN704 said:

I am actually on the Metro right now as I write this. This train is relatively packed. It’s kinda awkward because the seats on the DC metro aren’t horizontal like on other subway systems, but rather like the Lynx where they are two by two. People don’t want to sit next to one another but there is only so much standing room. 
 

Anyways, one thing COVID has made me discover is the beauty of bicycling for short trips. This isn’t unique to any one city and probably others are “discovering” this as well. From my house near the NoMa station in DC I would frequently take the train to Dupont Circle station  (5 stops, 14 min ride). Once you add in the 5 minute walk time to the station and add maybe 3 minutes waiting for train, that’s a 23 minute trip. I can bike from by house to the Dupont Circle neighborhood in about 12 minutes. It’s all flat in bike lanes, and it’s a really pretty ride. 
 

I don’t know the bike lane infrastructure in Charlotte, but I could see a similar thing occurring from say trips from South Blvd to Uptown, maybe Uptown to NoDa, and Uptown to Central. I don’t know if the B-cycle sharing system has expanded in the past couple of years. 
 

I would argue that biking is now a much bigger competitor to transit than ride share services, at least for me. I’m sure I’m not the only one making that conclusion. 


CLT is busier by far than ever today, Friday 4pm. They opened the concourse B security checkpoint again and the terminals are bustling. 
 

flight to DCA is oversold and They’re looking for volunteers. 
 

Birkdale Village last night was packed. Things in Charlotte seem normal. DC is getting there too. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.