Jump to content

Smith's Drug Store Redevelopment


Recommended Posts

As this Herald-Journal article details, the current Smith's Drug Store on Main Street is planned to be demolished, with a 4-story, mixed-use building to be built on the site + the adjacent parking lot.  Smith's would take a space on the Dunbar side of the building, while a separate retail spot would be available on Main.  Apartments would be on the top 3 floors.

I love the concept, however I hate the planned driveway and interior parking.  The owner claims those spots are make-or-break for the project (to accommodate customers w/limited mobility, they claim).  They mentioned the parking entrance at Library Commons as a precedent, but to me, Main is different.  It should be entirely pedestrian focused--no exceptions.  The obvious solution, to me, is for the City to reserve several spots on Dunbar as 15-min spots (and/or more handicapped spaces).  I hope the DRB suggests that during the final review (I'm honestly gonna e-mail them).

IMG_0128.thumb.JPG.a42f5d5f09fd24741bf2dcbaba22feae.JPG

IMG_0122.thumb.JPG.4ffd0d4319365289e5fa369d9f744442.JPG

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The Economic Development Director (PB) was absolutely not promoted from within. Prior to landing in her current role she had been a leasing agent with JDA.  I'll also say that the subject of ince

according to Patel the main motive behind the smith's Drug Store renovation is to implement the user-friendly workflow for the pharmacy. Expansion of a Smith's Food and Drug Store is proposed in a Rec

If you know Chris Story you may want to drop by and see him to let him know that we would like to see the Smith Drug project happen! Apparently the project ended up in the wrong hands at city hall and

Posted Images

Words cannot express how much I hate this. There should be no exceptions to drive-thrus in downtown on the ONE BLOCK of Main Street that is largely historically in tact.

While I am sympathetic to the need to provide accessible (handicapped) parking spaces, that does not explain the rationale for a drive-thru. The City could require accessible parallel parking spaces on Main or since Dunbar has angled parking it would be pretty easy to convert the spaces to be accessible. I'd say the Smith Drug people just want a drive-thru and are rationalizing it with something that's hard to argue against if you don't understand how the regulations actually work.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to beg to differ (and will probably receive howls of protests!). 

Many suburban pharmacies have drive-thru's, why shouldn't a downtown pharmacy have one?  A drive-thru seems to make perfect sense to me, especially as downtown's density increases.  Smith's has stuck with downtown when most others have bailed.  Why not accommodate their simple request?  A handful of parking spaces on Main and Dunbar streets won't cut it. 

The overall rendering looks great.

Okay, now rip me to pieces. :tw_grimace:

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify (since I was at the DRB meeting): the drive-thru is NOT an actual "drive up to a window to pick up your prescription without getting out of your car."  It is simply parking spots reserved for Smith's (which would have signage explaining that, security cameras, etc).  Hence why I say the City can accommodate them with reserved spots on Dunbar to avoid the necessity of of the drive-thru.  Pedestrians should be the #1 priority here, period.  (which is in the Urban Code; this drive-thru would require a variance which I hope isn't granted).

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

my 2 cents. I LOVE the fact that this is proposed, I like the preliminary design and like the green space/court yard. I agree that the drive through parking is a bit much and I'd much rather see that space filled with building or common outdoor space, but I do understand the desire for having their own parking. 

I will say this, this plan, flawed or not is a heck of a lot better than a parking lot and that building that Smith's is in now. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah ok. I get now that it's a space in which to drive your car through rather than a "drive-thru" like a CVS. For the record - my objection/hatred was based on the concept that this was adding parking and - more importantly - adding a driveway on Main Street.

After looking at the site plan more closely I see that they are actually removing the existing parking area to create a pedestrian alley and effectively swapping places with it to move some parking on/in the east side of the building to result in a net loss of spaces and the removal of the existing rather wide driveway with a much narrower drive aisle/hole.

I still think they should be removing driveways on Main Street, but I think this is ok.

I also don't care for the architecture, and not just because its contemporary bullshit architecture. I think it's boring and generic, even for contemporary bullshit architecture. It looks like any one of the bazillion apartment buildings going up here in Charlotte. It's not special at all, and Main Street should be the most special place. If it has to be contemporary bullshit architecture, at least make it good contemporary bullshit architecture.

To end on a positive note, the urban design is actually pretty good. I like the two retail spots on the ground floor, and I love that there is residential up top.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

To be fair, the design is in the early stages.  The current rendering is more like a massing and design intent.  Materials will be key, and of course the DRB will have the final say.  I must say, the DRB has done an admirable job lately insisting on positive changes in several recent projects.  I'm pretty confident that they realize the importance of this location and will make sure that design is high-quality.  I agree it looks really bland now, but I'd reserve some criticism until we see a more final design.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...

This project has gotten quite a bit larger.  It is now 6 stories (59 apts), with the top 2 floors set-back like the Aug Smith building.  The drive-thru remains, but the interior parking is gone.  Smith's Drug spans the whole building from Main to Dunbar now, with the extra tenant space along the side pedestrian plaza.

The DRB thought it looked too busy / too many different materials & colors, and asked them to simplify the design.  They also weren't sure about the orange-ish accent color.  And they wanted the top 2 floors to either be more cohesive with the first 4 floors or be de-emphasized (they thought it was neither here nor there).  It's still kind of early in the process, so they'll keep revising.

IMG_2676.thumb.JPG.502935995cf94aae7559cd50913b84a4.JPG

IMG_2674.thumb.JPG.14aba7de7d460ae6e4b049d94ce73b14.JPG

IMG_2680.thumb.JPG.19338d581e4a9389a90a5dc4323320ee.JPG

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still not a fan of this form an architectural standpoint. The driveway thing is dumb, and when Smith closes (let's face it- it's going to happen some day) we're going to be stuck with a building with a random drive thru that serves no purpose.

Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, Spartanburg Dude said:

I may be the only one, but I don't hate it. I don't love it either, but I'm okay with it. Hopefully, they'll take the feedback and make it a bit more cohesive and "burgish".

I love it!  It doesn't conform to other downtown buildings but I don't think it needs to conform.  Main Street needs a touch of contemporary architecture.  Other positives:

  • Six stories - wow!
  • 59 units - wow!
  • Fills up the entire space and the parking lot - wow!
  • And I think the drive thru is kind of cool.  - wow!

 

Edited by roads-scholar
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Spartan said:

Still not a fan of this form an architectural standpoint. The driveway thing is dumb, and when Smith closes (let's face it- it's going to happen some day) we're going to be stuck with a building with a random drive thru that serves no purpose.

Based on the floor plan, it looks like Smith's will be expanding pretty substantially, so they seem to be committed / confident that they'll be here a long time.

5 hours ago, spartanburgh said:

True, but the drive through could always be enclosed and made into a small retail space. Not ideal, but it could work....

Also, the set back for the upper floors is garbage. This part of the code sucks.

In general, I agree that the height limit / setback requirement on Main is unnecessary.  But in this case (with this style of building), I think it creates a better product.  With a modern design that doesn't match the rest of Main, it's more important for the massing to respect the context.  The setback achieves that, though the building design does need further refinement.  Personally, I'd like to see the grey brick on the first 3 floors be red brick instead, to match the context better.

(This is yet another grey building...TOO MUCH GREY!)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It does appear in the rendering that the set back is much less than what is required in the code. The rendering shows the

set back of the upper floors is 12 -16' (estimate on my part).  I think that a set back of this dimension is much more practical

than 60'.  If it were 60', the upper floors here and at Aug Smith would not have been possible or practical.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

This project may not happen. The City has decided not to offer any incentives for the first time and it is unlikely that the owner will

move forward unless they relent and do so. Also, Royce Camp may not be able to do the next project he had planned at the corner of 

S  Spring St. and Daniel Morgan Ave. The new administration has decided to wait and see what becomes of the new City Hall building

and the surrounding area before allowing any more development in that area which is controlled by the City.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, spartanburgh said:

This project may not happen. The City has decided not to offer any incentives for the first time and it is unlikely that the owner will

move forward unless they relent and do so. Also, Royce Camp may not be able to do the next project he had planned at the corner of 

S  Spring St. and Daniel Morgan Ave. The new administration has decided to wait and see what becomes of the new City Hall building

and the surrounding area before allowing any more development in that area which is controlled by the City.

Why must you ruin my day like that? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you know Chris Story you may want to drop by and see him to let him know that we would like to see the Smith Drug project happen! Apparently the project ended up in the wrong hands at city hall and that person told Chris we could not do it! It is about a 9 million dollar project and will help Main Street like the Aug Smith project did.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've heard some of the city senior leadership say before that the time would come when Council would have to set priorities as to what incentives they gave.  There would be more requests than they had funds to commit.  We may be hitting that point.  Increasingly, they are going to have to give incentives to the projects that have the highest chance of making the greatest impact.  

By the way, South Spring and Daniel Morgan?  Not sure what that means - possibly South Spring and Harris Place?  Or that block of Harris Place that runs between South Spring and Daniel Morgan?   I have some hopes for that two blocks of South Spring - that some dense residential development fronting on South Spring can happen along that stretch that blends downtown into Hampton Heights.  

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Historyguy said:

I've heard some of the city senior leadership say before that the time would come when Council would have to set priorities as to what incentives they gave.  There would be more requests than they had funds to commit.  We may be hitting that point.  Increasingly, they are going to have to give incentives to the projects that have the highest chance of making the greatest impact.  

This is a good problem to have, if this is what's happening. People want to be in downtown Spartanburg. They'll find a way. The block of Main St east of church has too much potential to be ignored for much longer.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish that was the case. It is a lack of knowledge and leadership in our city hall.  I am sorry for sounding negative but PB is our economic director and she needs to go.  We need a strong economic development person, a real go getter. We can’t afford to let any project go by without making sure it happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you're attacking someone who has presumably been involved in the many successful projects we've gotten in the past several years?  This project has always seemed borderline to me.  This is a first-time developer grappling with a large-scale project, who likely lacks the experience (and/or $$$) to pull it off.  I agree with several previous posters that we're at a point now where we don't need to be desperate for any project. We can wait for the right one(s) and otherwise let the market play out, without incentives.

Edited by westsider28
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.