Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Replies 184
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Market Street Enterprises announces their newest structure in their Gulch development: Three Thirty Three office building.  It will be a 5 story brick and glass structure featuring 69,000 sq. ft. of o

Exterior is complete. Entrance/lobby area facing Noble Park is now open.  Looking SE from alley between 11th Ave. South and 12th Ave. South, 1/2 bock north of Pine St: Looking SE from sta

Window trim in place. Looking NW from intersection of 11th Ave. North and Pine St: Looking south from 11th Ave. South near intersection with Laurel St:

Posted Images

Yeah I'd be really interested to hear more details about the park. IMO that's one of the biggest deficiencies of the gulch as a neighborhood, but why are they putting valuable land into it? Are they doing it like jw marriott, as a temporary arrangement, or is there some kind of deal with metro?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing I see wrong with this is there needs to be either solar panels or a green roof atop it to reduce heat kept by a blank roof or at least create power for the building. That said, it's fantastic otherwise and really makes it pop within a sea of glass.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, smeagolsfree said:

I hope the park is private/public otherwise it will be a homeless encampment.

That Church Street park is unfortunately placed right across from the free restrooms and AC/heat of the library.  How does the Ascend park fair with the homeless?

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, japan said:

That Church Street park is unfortunately placed right across from the free restrooms and AC/heat of the library.  How does the Ascend park fair with the homeless?

It’s not as bad as the Church Street park, but quite a few camp out in Walk of Fame Park, under the pedestrian bridge, and Riverfront Park. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, japan said:

That Church Street park is unfortunately placed right across from the free restrooms and AC/heat of the library.  How does the Ascend park fair with the homeless?

They hang out there too but not as much because there are no trees for them to hide in like ninjas. I have seen some creepy people in the dog park trying to mess with someone else's dog and also tried to go to the public restrooms there and low and behold a grouping of homeless folks hoarding the bathrooms. They will also hangout in the tunnel that runs under KVB.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, NashRugger said:

The only thing I see wrong with this is there needs to be either solar panels or a green roof atop it to reduce heat kept by a blank roof or at least create power for the building. That said, it's fantastic otherwise and really makes it pop within a sea of glass.

If they don't do anything on the roof (other than the unsightly mechanical units that they ultimately are not showing in the renders) I would hope they would do a white TPO/EPDM roof. It is amazing how much energy would be saved by just having a white roof up there. Drop heat island effect, but also keep the mechanical units much cooler and running more efficiently. 

15 hours ago, PHofKS said:

Awesome infill for the Gulch. I'm liking the diverse architecture.

I love the use of brick and a desire to make this building a bit "older". So much of new developments around the county are fixed on glass, that it takes away alot of character from the style. 

 

I am not exactly what one would call a height advocate, but I was wondering this the other day about height in the gulch. Outside of Icon and the Thompson, why are all the buildings 5 or less stories? When the gulch neighborhood was planned was it a zoning thing?

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Is building the bridge JUST beneficial, or are there also costs? And if there are costs can we not discuss them openly? We would be fools not to consider all sides of an issue.

I believe Leif is a local to the Gulch and has every right to share concerns on items which may negatively impact his quality of life. Market Street Enterprises is a well-run developer and hopefully will proceed cautiously  to prevent unintended consequences which may kill the golden goose that is the Gulch. The much-discussed Church Street Park is a perfect example of a 'benefit' costing more than its worth. Metro  cannot raze the park fast enough for downtown residents. 

There is a saying about those who reside in Ivory Towers ....

 

36 minutes ago, BnaBreaker said:

So now we're actively rooting against the construction of beneficial civic projects because homeless people might also find them pleasant places to be?   Seems... misguided?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, nashville_bound said:

Is building the bridge JUST beneficial, or are there also costs? And if there are costs can we not discuss them openly? We would be fools not to consider all sides of an issue.
....

The financial cost is a separate issue altogether, and I never said we shouldn't consider all sides of the issue.  All I did was offer my take on the issue.

Quote

I believe Leif is a local to the Gulch and has every right to share concerns on items which may negatively impact his quality of life.

Who even came close to suggesting he doesn't 'have a right' to express his opinion?  I don't understand this reflex of pretending that someone merely offering their opinion is actually trying to stifle opposing opinions.

Quote

Market Street Enterprises is a well-run developer and hopefully will proceed cautiously  to prevent unintended consequences which may kill the golden goose that is the Gulch. The much-discussed Church Street Park is a perfect example of a 'benefit' costing more than its worth. Metro  cannot raze the park fast enough for downtown residents.

You are right to say that caution should be taken, because it is possible for things to get out of hand, as you accurately pointed out.  All I am saying though is that I think it is rather foolish to make the argument that we should essentially do away with the concept of pleasant public spaces because gross homeless people might enjoy those spaces as well.
 

Quote

There is a saying about those who reside in Ivory Towers

So the guy defending the homeless from the degradation coming from people who live in the literal ivory towers that surround them is the elitist in this scenario.  Makes sense.

Edited by BnaBreaker
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, BnaBreaker said:

The financial cost is a separate issue altogether, and I never said we shouldn't consider all sides of the issue.  All I did was offer my take on the issue.

I was talking about 'costs' above and beyond the financial.... such as Leif's concern of an influx of homeless, some criminal or anti-social, as a result of the new short-cut the bridge would bring.

Your take seems to be more an aside critical of Leif's statement and less of one defending the bridge. If I am wrong then "my bad".

Edited by Guest
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, BnaBreaker said:

So the guy defending the homeless from the degradation coming from people who live in the literal ivory towers that surround them is the elitist in this scenario.  Makes sense.

degradation? ha

All the virtue signaling in the world will not help even one homeless person. Building a park that attracts homeless people, down-and-out, criminal or insane - all while lowering the civic participation of residents, will not help even one homeless person.

The Ivory Tower comment is on point ad not necessarily directed to you ... pontificating from on-high is much easier than living with some of the on-the-ground consequences ...

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, CenterHill said:

Agree, I think we're focusing on the wrong thing.     Homelessness is a whole separate issue that all cities need to tackle, but it's not a reason to say we're going to quit building parks and civic spaces.   

I'm not really concerned about the bridge so much because of the homeless issue, though I know it is a concern that has been voiced.  I just think it is a expensive boondoggle now that the stairs/elevator exists in Crossings. I'd advocate taking that 30 million or whatever it is presently and putting it into homeless programs, affordability programs, etc. I don't think it is a simple deal to reallocate the funds but I think there are better uses 4-5 years on from the bridge's first announcement.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By markhollin
      This is a re-configuring of a project that was supposedly going to be done by Hensler, but now will be the same Austin-based Endeavor group that is also doing the 26 story residential/office/Whole Foods on Broadway and 12th Ave. South.

      Here is the Tennessean article on the new proposal that will include a 28 story hotel, 28 story residential, and 21 story office:

      http://www.tennessean.com/story/money/2017/07/26/tower-project-planned-deja-vu-demonbreun-site/427602001/
      Here are the notes from the original concept (along with original renderings).  New renderings on page 2 of this thread on July 26, 2017.

       LA_TN and TheATX did some good snooping and found info online regarding Ray Hensler's proposed mixed-us project on what is commonly referred to as the Deja Vu site (although there are several more properties involved with the nearly full square block). 

      This 1 million square foot mixed-use development encompasses 2.7 acres at the periphery of downtown Nashville in the north Gulch area (see map below) encompassed by Demonbreun on the south, 13th Ave. South/I-40/65 on the west, McGavock on the north, and 12th Ave. South on the east.
      - Phase I will include a 290,000 square foot, 20-story office building with retail uses at the ground level and structured parking above- and below-grade.
      - Phase II will add a 260,000 square foot, 250-room hotel and a 170,000 square foot, 75-unit condo tower to the site.
      - Phase III will add 290,000 square feet of residential in a 25-story, 245-unit tower.
      The complex topography, neighboring buildings and adjacent infrastructure all influenced the master planning and architecture of the project, along with Nashville's form-based code.

      The renderings show structures of 34, 24, and 20 stories...so they don't match up with the Phase I, II, and II mentioned above.
      Here are some older articles of speculation on Hensler's plans and the sale of the properties:

      http://www.bizjournals.com/nashville/blog/2016/02/ray-henslers-next-luxury-condo-tower-you-might-say.html

      http://www.tennessean.com/story/money/real-estate/2016/02/08/nashville-deja-vu-strip-club-site-sold/79903640/

      Here are some renderings of the original Hensler-led proposal which has now been eclipsed. Renderings of the new Endeavor plans in a July 26th post on page 2 of this thread.

      Looking east from 13th Ave. South/I-40/65 and Demonbreun:

      Looking NW towards Demonbreun and 12th Ave. South:

      Looking SW from View from 12th Ave. south and McGavock:

       
      Looking NE toward downtown above Demonbreun:

       
      12th Avenue South entrance:

       
      The Demonbreun Street entrance:

       
      The development map showing the property as "Possible Condo Tower" in center of image:

    • By markhollin
      This is a massive development taking up 7.16 acres of the 11 acres that the Jim Reed family has owned since 1930. The lot is approximately twice the size of Broadwest and 2/3 the size of  Nashville Yards.  The developer is unknown, but may involve the Reed family. This info came forth in Water and Sewer Availability documents submitted to Metro Water.

      Here's what is being planned:

      -1,500,000 sq. ft. of office space (my guess is 2 towers of 30 stories each)
      - 800 residential units (my guess is two towers of  30 stories each)
      - 350 room hotel (my guess around 20 stories)
      - 150,000 sq. ft. of retail
      - 1,334 seats worth of restaurant space
      - Retaining the 1920s-era former brick Coca Cola plant that was turned into the Reed Chevrolet showroom/warehouse (2 stories, 159,000 sq. ft.)  in the 70s at the SE corner of Church and 16th Ave. North.  Yay!  

      - Not listed, but most assuredly part of the plan would probably be at least 3,000 parking spaces  (even larger than the 7 level underground space at Broadwest.

      My guess is this will be in the  $1 billion cost range.

      More behind the NBJ paywall here:

      https://www.bizjournals.com/nashville/news/2020/02/24/document-sketches-massive-development-for-broadway.html?iana=hpmvp_nsh_news_headline

      And behind the Nashville Post paywall here:

      https://www.nashvillepost.com/business/development/article/21117918/multiple-buildings-eyed-for-reed-midtown-site
       




       
      This screen snot from Smeagolsfree's excellent development map shows the site highlighted in gray at the center of the frame:


       
      This is the 1920s-era Coca Cola Plant was bought by Jim Reed Chevrolet and used as a showroom/warehouse (2 stories, 159,000 sq. ft.)  starting in the 70s.  It will be repurposed as part of the development):


    • By markhollin
      This development is large enough that it deserves it's own thread.  Lifestyle Communities will develop another great looking residential community in the Rutledge Hill area covering the better part of two blocks running along the north side of Ash Street between 2nd Ave. South and the west side of 3rd Ave. South.
      The first phase will be 11 stories tall at it's apex, but will have 3 and 7 story sections near the front entrance at 719 Third Ave. South.  There will also be two levels of parking in an underground garage. This phase covers .86 acres. Completion date is set for 

      The second phase is rumored to be 6 stories tall and will encompass about 430 apartments, and will cover about 1.44 acres between 3rd and 2nd Avenues South.  No renderings nor word yet on start date for the second stage.  

      My guess is that there will be some retail/restaurant space incorporated into at least a portion of the ground levels, as that is what Lifestyle Communities is doing with it's similar-sized development in Germantown.

      I really like the design on Phase I, and if the rest of the project reflects the same dynamic, I think this will be a very nice addition to that neighborhood. Classy stuff, just like the development they are putting together in G-Town.

      http://www.tennessean.com/story/money/real-estate/2017/03/24/first-look-amenity-deck-planned-168-unit-lc-sobro-apartment-tower/99550528/

      http://www.bizjournals.com/nashville/news/2017/03/24/first-look-after-germantown-apartment-developer.html

      http://www.nashvillepost.com/business/development/article/20856137/june-start-date-eyed-for-sobro-apartment-development



    • By it's just dave
      I want to quote the Alex S. Palmer & Company:
      "The future of Nashville is under construction now. Future generations have to live with what we, as developers, create. That places a heavy responsibility on us to be excellent—to only be involved in quality developments. Alex S. Palmer & Company is totally committed to developing space that is as functional and aesthetic as we can possibly make it ... for out time and for the future."
      If Alex can wait for WES, we can too. This is from a Sept. 27, 1987 Tennessean ad I found while rummaging through some drawers. Come on, Alex, the suit fits now. Build us our buildings.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.