Jump to content

Oracle, 60 acres at River North, 1,200,000 sq. ft. of space, $1.2B Investment, 8,500 jobs


markhollin

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, smeagolsfree said:

Well he didn't mess around. Now his new Economic Development Guy can bring in the next big fish. "We're gonna need a bigger boat"!

Some premium office space available around town. Would be nice to grab a few to fill up some of our current buildings.

Edited by DDIG
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


12 minutes ago, downtownresident said:

State incentives will top $100 million per Bob Rolfe. 
 

More from the NBJ here: NBJ

Now when is the announcement? 

To solve the great tunnel debate, looks like TWO tunnels. One for pedestrians, one for cars.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The state of Tennessee is pitching-in more than $100 million in incentives and related spending to help secure Oracle's new Nashville campus.  About $60 million of this will be in the form of a jobs grant. Another $38.4 million will be to pay for the two connections (Grace St. and Cleveland St.) underneath the I-24 inner belt. 

More at NBJ here:

https://www.bizjournals.com/nashville/news/2021/05/07/tn-oracle-incentives-ecd-tdot.html

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • markhollin changed the title to Oracle, 60 acres at River North, 1,200,000 sq. ft. of space, $1.2B Investment, 8,500 jobs
4 hours ago, smeagolsfree said:

Welcome to the forum Cadlefins! You can always count on the unexpected here. 

Where in world did you find that one Titan? Looks like something they did in China I would expect. It is rather cool.

Google search. I think it’s either a proposal or actual build in Miami.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, PaulChinetti said:

I imagine they will install a flood wall or something like downtown was going to do but quickly forgot about after the last flood.  
 

Which then will make the flooding worse everywhere else. 

I think it will be more like creative architecture. I think there will be raised structures with parking below, so if anything does get flooded it will be parking only. No reason to displace more water than you need to with a wall. I think that is what you will see with a lot of the newer structures on the Eat bank. 

The developers know the risk and they will plan for the worst case scenarios. Garages are a feature that can easily be flooded without a lot of damage and can be easily repaired. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, titanhog said:

In the plans, there is a canal that runs inland.  Would that displace enough flood waters to make a difference?

I thought about that, but the canal would equilibrate to the same water level as the river itself and would have negligible effect on the overall height of the river. I would imagine that when the river floods, so would the canal, unless it has some manner of diverting water e.g. to a bypass or some sort of storage reservoir (there's nothing existing for it to connect to, so it'd just be a water cul-de-sac by default). The canal could help with draining stormwater to prevent accumulation if the surrounding parking lots and buildings drain into it, but that doesn't address the river level rising and basically flooding based on elevation. Similarly with adding more vegetation that could absorb more of the rain than non-permeable surfaces, which also would not address the river level rising. The bottom line is that the source of the water causing the elevated river level is basically the entire drainage basin upstream.

So the ways I can think of to stop the East Bank from flooding during very heavy, concentrated rainfall would be (1) make changes to the Old Hickory Dam so that it can be used to manage flooding downstream (I don't think that is what it's designed for, but it could serve that purpose), (2) building a wall to keep back floodwaters and hope it doesn't get breached, (3) raise the elevation of the land as a whole and/or the buildings (via stilts), or (4) create a diverting floodway for the Cumberland River (example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_River_Floodway which diverts water away from Winnipeg that would otherwise flood the city). (1) and (4) would require political will and a lot of $$$, so I would imagine (2) or (3) would be the actually feasible options. As @PaulChinettipointed out, the water has to go somewhere, so flooding in other locations would be worse. Option (5), they could do absolutely nothing to mitigate the risk of floods and just pay for good flood insurance, which current renderings would suggest is the default course of (in)action, as there are no such walls, hills, or stilts in the image.

Edited by AsianintheNations
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.