Jump to content

The McClaren


vicupstate

Recommended Posts


  • Replies 458
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

On 8/21/2022 at 12:12 AM, apaladin said:

Where are all these people coming from that can afford 1500-3000 a month rent? Not just talking about downtown. 

My days as a tenant are years ago, but if landlords still want annual income equal to 45x a month’s rent, then someone making $67,500 could afford a $1,500/month apartment and someone making $135,000 could afford a $3,000/month one.

Plenty of white-collar jobs pay those amounts.  And someone relocating to Greenville from, say, San Francisco or even plenty of mid-sized cities would view $1,500 as shockingly inexpensive.

For $3,000 a month in Greenville, I’d expect a nice-looking building.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
16 hours ago, GVLover said:

Sheesh.

$2300 - studio

$2700  1 br

$3700 2 br

$3700 3 br, 2 ba

 

https://www.apartments.com/the-mcclaren-greenville-sc/eshghjp/

I just checked the prices for the two large apartment building next to this one. And these prices you are quoting are way higher than 400 Rhett and Link on the order of almost double.

I understand how Deca might be able to get away with these prices being so centrally located among other things, but this building is farther away and a lot bigger. 

Also just checked the 408 Jackson to see if it was just a new apartment thing but no it's prices were more in line with the other two I mentioned.

Edited by Horatio Nelson
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Here is info on the 49 “affordable” units: 

https://livemcclaren.com/mcclaren-affordable-guidelines/

My 3 bedroom/2 bath house in Mauldin which was built brand new in 2018 and gains equity costs less per month than their studio affordable apartment units which gains no equity. Just a little FYI there. Look at the bright side though. At least it’s a beautiful looking building. 

Edited by gman430
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, gman430 said:

Here is info on the 49 “affordable” units: 

https://livemcclaren.com/mcclaren-affordable-guidelines/

My 3 bedroom/2 bath house in Mauldin which was built brand new in 2018 and gains equity costs less per month than their studio affordable apartment units which gains no equity. Just a little FYI there. Look at the bright side though. At least it’s a beautiful looking building. 

From a distance….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, johnpro318 said:

I think once the lot behind it gets developed, people will have less issue with it. It just seems massive on academy 

The through-the-wall air conditioners show that this is cheap construction.  Downtown Greenville doesn’t need cheap construction.  Google the “Watt Hotel Rahway”: another new building that is similarly cheap and ugly.

Cheap, ugly high-rise apartment buildings are a plague in the Northeast and it’s disgraceful that one has been allowed into our beautiful downtown.  It wouldn’t have been hard to build a beautiful building instead.

Edited by PuppiesandKittens
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PuppiesandKittens said:

The through-the-wall air conditioners show that this is cheap construction.  Downtown Greenville doesn’t need cheap construction.  Google the “Watt Hotel Rahway”: another new building that is similarly cheap and ugly.

Cheap, ugly high-rise apartment buildings are a plague in the Northeast and it’s disgraceful that one has been allowed into our beautiful downtown.  It wouldn’t have been hard to build a beautiful building instead.

I don't hate the pattern on the building, but the overall boxyness with the repetitive brick with rectangular windows is overkill and the massing is quite jarring. One side is at least broken up into different sections but that one side is just an enormous wall. I think it would have worked better with a different layout altogether,  or maybe even split into two or 3 taller buildings with varying heights and different but complimentary styles.

Still like the original way better

image.png.cca180e4c7c0b0748a7b12bb56b487e8.png

Edited by distortedlogic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, motonenterprises said:

Well. It's there so deal with it. Lol. Let's be glad the place is growing and developing period. Lots of cities would like to be in Greenville's place.

No.

Greenville is a place where developers can make a lot of money.

Asking that they do so in a way that respects the beauty and quality of life of the area is a reasonable request.

A beautiful building can be built just as easily as an ugly building.

Edited by PuppiesandKittens
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, PuppiesandKittens said:

No.

Greenville is a place where developers can make a lot of money.

Asking that they do so in a way that respects the beauty and quality of life of the area is a reasonable request.

A beautiful building can be built just as easily as an ugly building.

You aren't going to change what millionaire developers build. Lol. Saying no on here isn't going to stop it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

 

This might be....no it probably is....the ugliest development in the whole city. The windows make it look like a hospital at best, a minimum security prison at worst. The exterior tiles look very cheap. The haphazard pattern of said tiles are uncomfortably random and mildly infuriating. I have an immediate negative emotional reaction every time I drive by it; however, because of it's scale and placement so close to Academy - I'm forced to experience it. 

I figured I was being overly sensitive so I looked the property up thinking it was low-income housing. But I was wrong. It's a "luxury building" that will be apartments (20% workforce) and another hotel. This cannot be right. No porches? No brick? No room for plantings? 

I cannot believe this passed the design review board. Who thought this would look good? I believe the only person that could be happy with this exterior is the designer of Link West --- because now they're not the ugliest building in Greenville.

Has anyone driven by this building recently and thought to themselves, "Oh my lanta, what a treasure for our Greenville skyline. Dr. McClaren would be so proud to have his name on this building." I guess it's too late, but I think they should plant kudzu around the base of the entire exterior and let it cover up this randomly gross cheap tile design. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.