Jump to content

Skyline East, multiple 6 to 15 story mixed-use structures, 1,400 units, 500,00 sq. ft. commericial, 14.5 acres


Recommended Posts


  • Replies 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

A massive 14.5 acre mixed-use project to be called Skyline East will populate the western edge of McFerrin Park, facing Dickerson Pike (where it parallels I-24) at Joseph Avenue.  It could involved nu

At this time the project has been withdrawn by the developers indefinitely from the Planning Commission meeting agenda. This happens a lot. There are a lot of things that need to happen before th

Not to get off topic, but they are different situations regarding section 8.  It’s also been a while since I worked in the affordable housing world so this may have changed some.  Berkshire Place

Posted Images

TDOT really needs to make Spring Street and Ellington join I-24 in one junction, and in the process widen Ellington to Briley to 6-8 lanes. I know you guys hate freeways, but they are necessary... and the ROW has already been in place for 50+ years. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MLBrumby said:

TDOT really needs to make Spring Street and Ellington join I-24 in one junction, and in the process widen Ellington to Briley to 6-8 lanes. I know you guys hate freeways, but they are necessary... and the ROW has already been in place for 50+ years. 

I have this same thought every single morning.  It seems idiotic to me that Ellington does not directly connect with the interstate. It is such a big artery for commuters, but to get to the interstate you have to stop at a few lights on Spring Street, or cut through the James Robertson traffic to work your way into the tiny turn lane under the overpass. Its such a cluster***** during morning and evening rush hour. 

Some say working on interstates does nothing to stop congestion, but what about better planning for interstate on-ramps and off-ramps that cause horrendous back-ups?! I would much rather have city officials focus on this rather than painting all of our city busses purple.

Edited by NashvilleObserver
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, BnaBreaker said:

Very great news indeed... though all I can think when I look at those satellite images is 'god I hope they rebuild those interchanges someday.'  What a huge waste of space those are.

Thought the same thing.     Is there really a need for fly ramps and 70mph traffic in this area?       Would love to reconnect some grid and rebuild neighborhood density.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

To me the knock on interstate work is that it's just a black hole. Any improvement you make gets immediately swamped by a few more people living 30 miles out and adding to the traffic/parking problem. Traffic quickly returns to the equilibrium based on whatever is awful enough to force people to live closer in, and you're back where you started. This compares to a bus line, which can scale up by an order of magnitude more per space required, and doesn't necessitate a bunch of parking on the other end.

If they throw money at this spaghetti intersection, I can only hope they take the opportunity to try to fix the way it carves up and separates these neighborhoods. The East bank and McFerrin Park are basically completely isolated by giant interstates, with terrible pedestrian/bike connections to eachother and the rest of east nashville, not to mention downtown. I saw some interesting ideas thrown around with the River North plans. Here's hoping.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a question for you guys:  What would have happened with Nashville if...let's say...instead of 40, 65 and 24 coming through downtown, government had decided the interstates should loop around Nashville basically where 840 is (and where it was designed north of town)?  Would Nashville be the city it is today?  Would it be as large as it is?  Larger?

The reason I ask is that I know some small towns in the past always wanted the interstate close by because they felt it would help the city grow.  And...normally, it did.  But...just like Nashville, it sometimes dissected neighborhoods and made some parts of a town worse than before.

Just wonder what Nashville would be like without all of the neighborhoods cut off the way they are now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, titanhog said:

Here's a question for you guys:  What would have happened with Nashville if...let's say...instead of 40, 65 and 24 coming through downtown, government had decided the interstates should loop around Nashville basically where 840 is (and where it was designed north of town)?  Would Nashville be the city it is today?  Would it be as large as it is?  Larger?

The reason I ask is that I know some small towns in the past always wanted the interstate close by because they felt it would help the city grow.  And...normally, it did.  But...just like Nashville, it sometimes dissected neighborhoods and made some parts of a town worse than before.

Just wonder what Nashville would be like without all of the neighborhoods cut off the way they are now.

I think if they had done that with all of the cities when building the interstate system things would be much different. Many things would have changed in cities across the country, however, we would probably be looking at a lot more sprawl than we have today. We can never really know what things would have looked like as there would still have to have been major highways into the cities for the workers working in the inner city, and whos to say they would not have severed the neighborhoods at that time too.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems to me, in the 21st Century, we should do our best to reconnect some of these neighborhoods when we can.  What would be nice, IMO, is if they took out the east loop (I-40 / I-24) by the stadium that cuts off E. Nashville (totally demolish it)...and then just use the western portion and cap most of it between Division and Charlotte.  That would do a lot to give us back some of the neighborhoods.  If there was a way to also do something between Germantown and N. Nashville...that would be great, too.  And...maybe caps over I-440 in some places.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I kind of have this crazy idea that they could create almost a roundabout with the loop that goes around Nashville. I don't know if the entire thing could be capped...but if critical points could be capped...just so there is some type of connection it would help tremendously. If they could use all of the existing lanes and make them go one direction (since it's already basically a circle around downtown) it would keep the traffic flowing. I've never actually seen that done...so I'm sure there are reasons it couldn't be done. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Edgefield D said:

I kind of have this crazy idea that they could create almost a roundabout with the loop that goes around Nashville. I don't know if the entire thing could be capped...but if critical points could be capped...just so there is some type of connection it would help tremendously. If they could use all of the existing lanes and make them go one direction (since it's already basically a circle around downtown) it would keep the traffic flowing. I've never actually seen that done...so I'm sure there are reasons it couldn't be done. 

We looked at this previously for an MPO study (didn't make the final report). The idea came from MoDOT who studied it for Kansas City's downtown loop.

The only problem with it is the segment from Interstate 65 to Interstate 24 on the south side, no matter which way the one-way traffic flows drivers trying to connect between I-65 and I-24 have to make the eight-mile detour around north Nashville. (KC's interstate loop is half that distance and their interchanges are more evenly spaced.)

The amount of traffic making this movement was significant enough to torpedo the idea although I am not sure how much traffic patterns would change were it to be realized. Interstate 440 would be a logical detour.

In any case it would indeed improve traffic considerably, not only at the interchanges but also the surface streets connecting to ramps.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, PruneTracy said:

We looked at this previously for an MPO study (didn't make the final report). The idea came from MoDOT who studied it for Kansas City's downtown loop.

The only problem with it is the segment from Interstate 65 to Interstate 24 on the south side, no matter which way the one-way traffic flows drivers trying to connect between I-65 and I-24 have to make the eight-mile detour around north Nashville. (KC's interstate loop is half that distance and their interchanges are more evenly spaced.)

The amount of traffic making this movement was significant enough to torpedo the idea although I am not sure how much traffic patterns would change were it to be realized. Interstate 440 would be a logical detour.

In any case it would indeed improve traffic considerably, not only at the interchanges but also the surface streets connecting to ramps.

Ha! Well, I'm glad to know it wasn't completely off the wall. I can see how people would be discouraged by the 8 mile loop. I personally...would rather drive a little longer if it meant I was actually moving....so that doesn't sound all that horrible to me (I do that all the time already in today's traffic realities). 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

At this time the project has been withdrawn by the developers indefinitely from the Planning Commission meeting agenda.

This happens a lot. There are a lot of things that need to happen before this can be approved. I am sure something will have to be worked out with the section 8 housing there not to mention a traffic study and community meeting to name a few.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
33 minutes ago, MLBrumby said:

River chase in Brentwood?

15 minutes ago, WebberThomas4 said:

Riverchase off of Dickerson near Spring Street

Previously known as "Skyline East" that went dormant a year or two ago. I recall seeing a public meeting announcement recently, but did not attend.

image.thumb.png.747202f4c0cff0419077605bb1a970ba.png

  • Thanks 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

We are already pursuing this company to see what is up. This company is part of a larger company in Austin. Riverchase is just a place holder company.

 

Den Development out of Austin is the parent. From what I am hearing they are wanting to sell to Oracle, but that may be a rumor.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, smeagolsfree said:

We are already pursuing this company to see what is up. This company is part of a larger company in Austin. Riverchase is just a place holder company.

 

Den Development out of Austin is the parent. From what I am hearing they are wanting to sell to Oracle, but that may be a rumor.

https://www.crea.com/property-portfolio
 

This is the company that presented during last week’s community meeting. They have developments near the Oracle campus in Austin. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

The way the streets are laid out here, somewhat of a cluster **** due to the presence of the expressways, a dense residential development here with some commercial could be really cool.  I don't know how good the views are from that site, but I venture pretty darn good.  If so, it would seem the views would be protected in the longterm because no new buildings are likely to go up to obstruct them.  Plus the streets there seem to be just off the beaten path, like a little urban nook.  Such a convenient location too. If designed properly, this would be a great asset to EN.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, MLBrumby said:

I don't know how good the views are from that site, but I venture pretty darn good

The views from there would be phenomenal.  Particularly as you go up just a few stories above the raised interstate and any other infrastructure.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By smeagolsfree
      This is mystery tower number two I have know about for a while as well.
      300 Plus Units
      316 Feet Tall
      Developer: Scenic Investments

      More at Nashville Post here:

      https://www.nashvillepost.com/business/development/article/21095184/tower-eyed-for-midtown-site-near-split

      More behind the NBJ paywall here:
      https://www.bizjournals.com/nashville/news/2019/10/31/global-company-pitches-broadway-tower.html
      Project team
      Smith Gee Studio (architect) Barge Cauthen & Associates (civil engineer) Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc. (traffic engineer) From what I gathered on the original water sewer document, the plan was for 327 units.  


      I happen to know there are more tower announcements to come. This one is marked as Unknown Development which is now known.

    • By markhollin
      Zach Liff's DZL Management along with partner developer Draper &  Kramer have unveiled ambitious plans for the Cummins Station area properties that cover 13 acres, most of which are surface lots surrounding the iconic massive office space converted from a railroad warehouse.

      Eventually, it could end up being as many as 8 towers. The initial foray will be a series of 31-34 story towers along the east side of the CSX tracks in the Gulch, bordered by Demonbreun St. on the north and Cannery Row on the south.

      Smith Gee Studios and Solomon/Cordwell/Buenz will be the architects.

      A Set. 2019 groundbreaking is planned for Tower 1. 

      No price tag has been put on the project. 

      More behind the Nashville Post paywall here:

      https://www.nashvillepost.com/business/development/article/21045564/huge-project-could-complement-cummins-station

      And behind theNBJ paywall here:

      https://www.salsarestaurantnashville.com/

      This is the Phase 1 Tower, which will be just to the southeast  of Cummins Station, hugging the CSX tracks to the west, and just to the northeast of the proposed Gulch Pedestrian Bridge on the west side of the intersection of 10th Ave. South and Lea Ave.  It will be 31 stories/369' tall, with 333 residential units, 10,200 sq. ft. of ground level retail, and a 360 capacity parking in a garage within a 7 story pedestal.




       
       
       

       






      Tower 2 will be nearly a twin of Tower 1, just to the south,  with its southern border the Cannery Row area.  It will also be residential in focus at 31 stories with a 360 capacity garage.

      Towers 3 & 4 will each be 34 stories.  #3 will feature a hotel as well as residential, and #4 will be residential.  Each will feature garages that will hold a minimum of 420 cars. 
      Future phases will include at least 2 towers of undetermined size on the Union Station Railroad Shed site (currently surface parking), at least one tower on the surface lot at SE corner of Demonbruen and 10th Ave. South, and a tower at the apex of Lea Ave. and Palmer Place, immediately to the NW of the 30 story 805 Lea residential tower about to get underway by another developer.  In total, the plan is for at least 8 towers, as well as a few shorter structures. 
      This is a massing render of Tower 3 (hotel/residential) looking east along Demonbruen Street Viaduct:



      Massing render of Towers 1-4 looking east:



      Diagram of full Station District on the 13 acre Cummins Station campus:

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.