Jump to content

Ballantyne Village


StevenRocks

Recommended Posts


  • Replies 199
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Wow, is it topped out yet? This area has changed so much over the past 10 years - it's ridiculous! Even in the past 2 years there have been lots of changes. My gf used to live in Ballantyne, and if she and her family could see this development I think it would even surprise them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 1 year later...
Went through Ballantyne over the weekend for the first time in a long time. Looks like the new office buildings are about ready to open, if there not already?

5img6652.jpg

aloft hotel construction

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least the newer stuff in Ballantyne has graduated to smaller lots, taller buildings and structured parking. When you look at aerials of the main corporate park area at Johnston Rd and Ballantyne Commons it is just plain depressing. Fully 75% of the land appears to be paved over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for sharing these pictures. I think they are as good as they can be, given the subject.

Isn't it great that we've created an urban environment where people never have to venture outdoors?

House - garage - car - parking deck - tube - office

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for sharing these pictures. I think they are as good as they can be, given the subject.

Isn't it great that we've created an urban environment where people never have to venture outdoors?

House - garage - car - parking deck - tube - office

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Because suburban office parks do not generally represent a sustainable mode of living. IE, they almost exclusively require cars to get to. Hell, there is at least one parking garage (in Santa Monica I believe) that has a LEED plaque.

FWIW, the lower certification levels of LEED - "Certified" and "Silver" - are relatively easy to obtain by most buildings, especially under earlier versions of LEED. Having said that, LEED 2009 has substantially upped the ante and rebalanced the points with an emphasis on preventing climate change. Basically that means some of the "easy" points are worth less and the more important credits - energy optimization, etc - are worth more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because suburban office parks do not generally represent a sustainable mode of living. IE, they almost exclusively require cars to get to. Hell, there is at least one parking garage (in Santa Monica I believe) that has a LEED plaque.

FWIW, the lower certification levels of LEED - "Certified" and "Silver" - are relatively easy to obtain by most buildings, especially under earlier versions of LEED. Having said that, LEED 2009 has substantially upped the ante and rebalanced the points with an emphasis on preventing climate change. Basically that means some of the "easy" points are worth less and the more important credits - energy optimization, etc - are worth more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is not a correct statement. Just because something will be around for 50 or so years does not automatically make it sustainable. Sustainable is something that will last hundreds of years with minimal updating in terms of materials used to keep it functioning and in good condition. Sustainable is creating the highest energy efficient and quality use-version of a building, event, lifestyle, etc.

Suburban office parks do none of these in their current form. We don't even know how many people will require huge non-descript offices in 50 years (think about how many people already work from home, small offices, etc.), so the business model might not even be sustainable.

However, with a little creative thinking and a good chunk of money, they could be made much more sustainable. Alternative modes of transportation, rip up the impervious surface lots, if they must be replaced, build a deck with a truly green roof and energy efficient exterior cladding or solar panels. Put green roofs on the office buildings or at least change the roofing materials to a white roof. Add in operating windows every other curtain wall panel. Replace old HVAC systems with more efficient ones. etc etc etc.

There is no reason why Ballantyne can't do some of these things. As it stands right now, Ballantyne is one of the more unsustainable office clusters in Charlotte.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the transportation standpoint, a development like Ballantyne ideally should be designed with its own internal transportation system, so a large live/work development can at least approach being truly auto-independent. And if it is designed in from the start, it is far less expensive than going back and retro-fitting.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So everyone can get from their cul-de-sac to their sprawling office complex? Ballantyne, if designed in that mixed use sense, which is what I think you are getting at, would not even remotely resemble Ballantyne. Baxter Village in Fort Mill is a great example of the type of large scale urban development that we need to be seeing across the Carolinas.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.