Jump to content


kermit

Recommended Posts


I'll add a couple of small points to what I see omitted from the initial sketches:

First, the Norfolk Southern main lines (at least two tracks, perhaps 3 if the passenger bypass gets built) will remain and will be relatively busy. Second, the CATS North Yard will certainly remain. Given CATS stumbles with connecting the Blue and Silver lines I wonder if there are some opportunities for rethinking the connection and/or yard layout in the context of the proposed park  (although I am not sure what those could be).

While the possibility of a signature park is great, it will always suffer from some connectivity and boundary issues due to active tracks that will run on all sides (NS to West, CATS to East, CSX to South and Sugar Creek to North)

Edited by kermit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kermit said:

I'll add a couple of small points to what I see left out of the initial sketches:

First, the Norfolk Southern main lines (at least two tracks, perhaps 3 if the passenger bypass gets built) will remain and will be relatively busy. Second, the CATS North Yard will certainly remain. Given CATS stumbles with connecting the Blue and Silver lines I wonder if there are some opportunities for rethinking the connection and/or yard layout in the context of the proposed park  (although I am not sure what those could be).

While the possibility of a signature park is great, it will always suffer from some connectivity and boundary issues due to active tracks that will run on all sides (NS to West, CATS to East, CSX to South and Sugar Creek to North)

Could always build the park over any existing rail lines if that is possible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, norm21499 said:

Could always build the park over any existing rail lines if that is possible

Yes, but current elevations make that difficult. The CATS tracks are significantly higher than Brevard North of 23rd st and much of N Tryon. There is never a space where the tracks run lower than street level.  The NS bridge over N Tryon also makes it virtually impossible to trench those tracks.

Edited by kermit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kermit said:

Yes, but current elevations make that difficult. The CATS tracks are significantly higher than Brevard North of 23rd st and much of N Tryon. There is never a space where the tracks run lower than street level.  

Well that is..... inconvenient lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, kermit said:

More importantly, I have heard from more than one source that NS is open to market-rate offers for the property.  As you can tell from the second rendering, the preliminary designs include plenty of office space to make the land purchase plus creating a massive park feasible. The fact that most of this land is in an opportunity zone has also peaked the interest of many potential players.

This is a key paragraph. Hearing that NS is open is actually fantastic news. I think there will actually end up being more development than is shown in that rendering, but that is OK and desirable.  This should be integrated along the cross Charlotte trail which would connect to to Cordelia Park as well.

There is potential for a really transformational project here. Brevard and Tryon must be better connected to better serve those communities west of Tryon.

Edited by Desert Power
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

So, based on our lack of news, this project has really died, along with the remainder of the city's wider ambition to do anything other than 'muddeling through.'

Anyway, there is some relevant news from Atlanta. A large portion of Tilford Yard in Atlanta (a former CSX yard on the NW side of downtown) just sold to a data center company for $1.7 million per acre (55 acres total for $94.1 million). Since Tilford is bounded on one side by the much larger NS Inman yard (which is not going away) and is less centrally located in Atlanta this sale may set a floor valuation for the land beneath the potential Queens Park.

https://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/news/2023/03/22/tilford-yard-data-center-project.html

Edited by kermit
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kermit said:

So, based on our lack of news, this project has really died, along with the remainder of the city's wider ambition to do anything other than 'muddling through.'

Anyway, there is some relevant news from Atlanta. A large portion of Tilford Yard in Atlanta (a former CSX yard on the NW side of downtown) just sold to a data center company for $1.7 million per acre (55 acres total for $94.1 million). Since Tilford is bounded on one side by the much larger NS Inman yard (which is not going away) this land sets a bit of a floor valuation for potential Queens Park land.

https://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/news/2023/03/22/tilford-yard-data-center-project.html

I'm not surprised as I worked on the due diligence preliminary work on the now-sold of the CSX Tilford Yard. Norfolk-Southern is stubborn.  They (N-S) have refused anything in Georgia. North Carolina is in the same boat with N-S on  decommissioned rail yards.

Queens Park might have to be truncated to the proposed 12-14-acre Cullman Avenue park concept being developed right now by Mecklenburg County Parks & Recreation.  https://charlotte.axios.com/310152/a-new-park-bigger-than-romare-bearden-is-proposed-for-noda/

However, the Friends of Queens Park are pursuing expansion of the above park concept into a larger, 37-acre regional park that would be expanded over time. 

https://charlotte.axios.com/313950/nonprofit-proposes-a-37-acre-signature-park-for-charlotte/

Edited by kayman
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, JeanClt said:

N-S has just been a pain all over. Terrible company.

I am not sure I would say NS is behaving badly with this issue. They need a Charlotte yard and they have never suggested it is for sale.

Up until around 10-20 years ago NS was know as the railroad that was run by Civil Engineers rather than business guys (CSX was the opposite). The tracks were always in top notch condition, they planned effectively for their (freight carrying) future, and spent more money on maintenance than many institutional shareholders wanted.  Over the past 10 years they have changed by fully embracing precision scheduled railroading and maintenance has taken a back seat to shareholder return. I suspect they know exactly how much the Charlotte yard is worth, both in terms of real estate and operationally. I would not be surprised if they have a location for a new Charlotte-area yard (in Gaston) picked out (I also would not be surprised if they were willing to sell about 60% of the Charlotte yard to a market rate bidder even without a replacement).   Even if NS were to make the land available, its a tough location for a park. The Blue Line tracks and the NS main tracks are going to remain as the North and South boundaries to any potential park space no matter what so park access will be very limited.

Edited by kermit
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.