Jump to content

Charlotte/Raleigh Highrise Building Booms


JacksonH

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

  • 1 month later...

https://www.theassemblync.com/place/raleigh-charlotte-a-tale-of-two-skylines/

comparing Charlotte and Raleigh's skylines. 

I love our skyline here but this is not quite fair an article to Raleigh.  Their major employer downtown is the state government which will not build a signature office tower and most would be called Class B at best.  Raleigh does not have the large office using employers like Charlotte.  The total Charlotte vs Raleigh Durham office market is almost equal but the Triangle is much more suburban in nature.  Biotech and pharma don't need or want high rise office towers.    I do believe Raleigh put some false height restrictions where there should not be any.  But look at other state capitals and tell where they build signature state owned buildings today.  Not in Atlanta, not in Nashvillle, not in Austin any capital city.    The fact is a financial center Charlotte has large office users that require lots of spaces and like signature buildings.  

  • Like 4
  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Matthew.Brendan said:

Austin is not even close anymore. Whereas Charlotte cannot break 600' on its recent builds (well BOAT did manage to (632'), and hopefully Riverside will as well. Duke annoyingly came up a little short) Austin has 7 projects under construction (+2 more approved) that are all well over 600'+ in height (plus 2 existing) for a total of 11. Charlotte has 4 total. lol.

In Austin that includes a 875' office/residential (66 floors) that beats our tallest by a couple feet, plus a super-tall 1022' (87 floors) hotel/office/residential.

I'm gonna go ahead and wager it will be a long time still before anything beats BOACC let alone cracks 1000' in Charlotte.

If you think Charlotte is on fire with its recent buildings (and it is, truly) Austin is just bonkers.

 

I will document it next year on a trip to Austin.  I do agree while most of their towers are mixed use in nature they do have some big office towers going up too.  Like this one just broken ground the Republic Tower https://austin.urbanize.city/post/austin-republic-tower-groundbreaking  it is 710 feet tall and it was designed by Duda Paine of Durham! 

 

Edited by KJHburg
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Austin is not even close anymore. Whereas Charlotte cannot break 600' on its recent builds (well BOAT did manage to (632'), and hopefully Riverside will as well. Duke annoyingly came up a little short) Austin has 7 projects under construction (+2 more approved) that are all well over 600'+ in height (plus 2 existing) for a total of 11. Charlotte has 4 total. lol.
In Austin that includes a 875' office/residential (66 floors) that beats our tallest by a couple feet, plus a super-tall 1022' (87 floors) hotel/office/residential.
I'm gonna go ahead and wager it will be a long time still before anything beats BOACC let alone cracks 1000' in Charlotte.
If you think Charlotte is on fire with its recent buildings (and it is, truly) Austin is just bonkers.
 

Indeed. Austin projects: https://aquilacommercial.com/learning-center/downtown-austin-towers/
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 10/4/2022 at 1:42 PM, AirNostrumMAD said:

Yeah, it's the equivalent of asking why Charlotte doesn't have nearly the same caliber of education in addition to the Triangle being a significant amount more of a share of population that hold a higher education degree (usually in the top 5)   and why Charlotte doesn't work on having better universities, etc & coming to the conclusion that Charlotte just wasn't as interested in nor invested in education as much as Raleigh. IMO. It just so happened Charlotte became a banking hub that traditionally utilized large office towers and Raleigh being the state capital traditionally got that government support for those universities. I don't think there's anything Raleigh could have done to build as many large office towers as Charlotte's uptown did other than to become a banking hub too and abandon the whole top tier global tech hub thing. It's more of a note "this is why Charlotte has more taller office buildings than Raleigh" rather than what Raleigh could or couldn't have done to have pretty office buildings lining a street. 

Charlotte has a very pretty skyline of tall buildings. Photogenic. But the uptown area outside of Tryon St., Brooklyn (on one side at least), a few blocks of Church & Trade and around Romare Park (and additionally History 4th ward) range from terrible to awful for the most part. It would be great if so much of uptown wasn't so bad. You wont really see such desolation in downtown Raleigh like you do in such a significant portion of Uptown. Also, smaller buildings do make the skyline look even more impressive than signature towers (Which is why I Love the view from SouthEnd more than I like the East/West views even though technically the skyline looks prettier from those angles, there is just something more impressive to me viewing southend and uptown together)

image.thumb.png.c2caf3ed9f5f4695dcc127872e21117b.png

 

image.thumb.png.d8fced717cda886115bb2420e5a310e8.png

Charlotte may have more events (primarily due to sporting events) but there seems like a lot more to do in Raleigh's downtown to me. A lot more places to eat, and it's very 3 dimensional whereas uptown is mostly Tryon Street and Romare Park for the most part. And walking down Tryon, there's just not much to do there or places I'd want to casually eat whereas downtown Raleigh has tons of places I'd want to eat. More retail, more shopping (Yes, even chains like Urban Outfitters but mostly small business) and it's not just on one street. Multiple streets are just nice, have businesses, things to do.  Downtown Raleigh is just full, exponentially fuller, than uptown Charlotte with so many nooks and crannies of great urbanity.

image.thumb.png.e826e59463fa2c1cb6b3758fd0ed0820.png

I could see Raleigh's skyline boom like Austin or Nashville - it has the ingredients. It doesn't mean it will. But I could see a huge skyscraper boom of residential towers similar to those two cities (whereas Charlotte was driven primarily by Office Towers, Nashville and Austin skew towards residential). Raleigh has so many assets, while it may never have a prettier skyline, I could see it becoming people's favourite NC downtown as it gets a critical mass of people and feels more bustly with people. It'll also be very cool if Commuter rail connects Durham and Raleigh and they both grow bigger in population. That'd be dope for a bustling DT Raleigh connected via rail to a more bustling DT Durham, 

Likewise, there's strengths Charlotte's uptown has that Raleigh's doesn't. It's like comparing Dallas to Austin. Dallas is the 500 lb gorilla but Austin has great assets at the ground level whereas Dallas has a lot of mega blocks and empty parking lots like Uptown too. IMO. Both have characteristics that are great, so I don't want this misconstrued as me dumping on Charlotte (just playing devil's advocate for Raleigh in the Charlotte section). It's just opinions I've noted while listening to Raleigh-based posters usually mentioning to the effect that Charlotte poster's emphasize taller office/bank towers when talking about DT Raleigh when that's just not it's gig.

Very good assessment of both cities downtowns.  I think what has Charlotte behind Raleigh in street activity is Price.  The older buildings in Raleigh probably have more affordable rents allowing small businesses and retail to manage.  Uptown Charlotte rents are too high and the lack of much older affordable inventory doesn’t help but actually aggravates the problem.

On 9/1/2022 at 2:07 PM, Mid South NC said:

F2EF1785-C818-4AA9-B736-826C52DC458D.jpeg

Looks quite impressive - for the year 2125 in Downtown Raleigh!

72778C65-F073-404B-886A-89CA013C0E79.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, KJHburg said:

Raleigh be like this this new 30 story apartment is so tall you can see 4th Ward in uptown Charlotte from it.  But this is a nice design and not sure the views reach that far LOL>

""A new mixed-use development is set to rise 30 stories and include 373 multifamily units and 10,000 square feet of retail space. Connecticut-based developer VeLa Development Partners is leading the project, according to new site plans filed just this week with the city.""

 

 

vela-longview-studio-1.jpg

raleigh-exterior-2-vela-longview-jpg.jpg

raleigh-exterior-1-vela-longview_750xx4000-2250-0-207.jpg

As hilarious as that is, that is actually a very good looking tower! 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, KJHburg said:

raleigh-exterior-2-vela-longview-jpg.jpg

raleigh-exterior-1-vela-longview_750xx4000-2250-0-207.jpg

Parking podiums like this are like the mom jeans of architecture:

MomJeans.thumb.jpg.b23a3d84cff8f8c36f27e56b9bbabdb9.jpg

Why would you choose to draw attention to an unflattering area instead of hiding it? But then again, mom jeans are inexplicably in style right now, just like these accentuated parking podiums. Coincidence???

But in all seriousness, that Raleigh project is really nice, and a good use of an irregular and relatively small site.

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/13/2022 at 7:08 PM, KJHburg said:

Raleigh be like this this new 30 story apartment is so tall you can see 4th Ward in uptown Charlotte from it.  But this is a nice design and not sure the views reach that far LOL>

""A new mixed-use development is set to rise 30 stories and include 373 multifamily units and 10,000 square feet of retail space. Connecticut-based developer VeLa Development Partners is leading the project, according to new site plans filed just this week with the city.""

 

 

vela-longview-studio-1.jpg

raleigh-exterior-2-vela-longview-jpg.jpg

raleigh-exterior-1-vela-longview_750xx4000-2250-0-207.jpg

Hopefully this, BRT, and the Shaw University redevelopment plans spur high density development in this area. Downtown Raleigh tower development is skewed heavily towards the west side. Historic Oakwood in the north will likely be untouched but everything south of New Bern Avenue will be redevelopment in the future.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Raleigh be like this this new 30 story apartment is so tall you can see 4th Ward in uptown Charlotte from it.  But this is a nice design and not sure the views reach that far LOL>
""A new mixed-use development is set to rise 30 stories and include 373 multifamily units and 10,000 square feet of retail space. Connecticut-based developer VeLa Development Partners is leading the project, according to new site plans filed just this week with the city.""
 
 
http://content.invisioncic.com/x329420/monthly_2022_10/vela-longview-studio-1.thumb.jpg.12f59a298f727679d7d3e257c9936ca2.jpg
http://content.invisioncic.com/x329420/monthly_2022_10/raleigh-exterior-2-vela-longview-jpg.thumb.jpg.e39228ab422f52d2a98f9b288efc82e5.jpg
http://content.invisioncic.com/x329420/monthly_2022_10/raleigh-exterior-1-vela-longview_750xx4000-2250-0-207.jpg.f80a408bbae8e2bc30954707553360ae.jpg


Isn’t this the exact view museum south tower would have facing west? Lol

It’s the same developer no?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
16 minutes ago, carolinaboy said:

I'm moving Charlotte up two spots. Raleigh and Durham should be considered as two different cities because they are, in fact, two different cities. Which cities are lumped in with SF? Oakland and San Jose? This should either be "cities" or "metro areas/regions" not a combination of both. Did they include Fort Worth with Dallas?

Here is the actual report (not the CNBC summary): American Growth Project – Frank Hawkins Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise (unc.edu)

They did "expanded metropolitan areas" which means in some regions they did the CSA (Like SF Bay Area includes Oakland and San Jose ; Raleigh + Durham ; Dallas is indeed the metroplex including Fort Worth, et..)

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Be the HQ of Amazon and Microsoft. Unlock the key to success. Boeing Commercial Airplanes... also a HUGE GDP win for Seattle. A 777 rolling off the assembly line is worth $320 million a plane. 
The amount of high rise development also makes sense in Seattle given land constraints there. With 4.1 million people in their metro area and land constraints like the Puget Sound to the west, Lake Washington, and mountains / state forest to the East, it forces development into a tighter space than a flat metro like Charlotte that can just sprawl and sprawl. Real estate near downtown Seattle is just so much more valuable given the scarcity of land that you have to go vertical... while we still have relatively low density land use just steps from our core. 

We (charlotte) missed the memo of just because there’s a lot of land doesn’t mean consume it all in one go. Anything for cheaper everything right?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.