Jump to content

New Titans Stadium (60,000 capacity dome, ground level retail, directly east of Nissan Stadium)


markhollin

Recommended Posts


22 hours ago, DDIG said:

Are the Titans truly the beggars here? Their current lease agreement has Metro on the hook for a whole lot and the economics for the East Bank don't work well without heavy Titans participation in  a new agreement / approach.

Maybe a poor choice of words, but I think it is in their best interest to work with Metro on these agreements to put some of this aside to get their new stadium and help Metro out. If Metro is going to put up hundreds of millions for a new stadium, then why would they have to put money into needless parking up front when they do not really need to at this time, with the future development that will be coming and the space that will be available when the old stadium comes down. There is still a lot of parking on the downtown side of the stadium that people are able to walk to the games.

These old agreements were without future vision of the ways things could work out.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

https://www.axios.com/local/nashville/2022/09/14/cooper-titans-nissan-stadium-deal-update\

More delays on the stadium  financing plan being announced.   Will the Titans even be able to bring $700 Million in real funds to the table ?  

Will have to see how this delay impacts Metro  Council deliberations,  it's probably gonna be tough to get this through approvals  before January or maybe even later.

  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The council was never going to vote on a deal prior to the study being done on required work for renovations. That study is expected to be done in mid to late November. If a term sheet is presented in September, that gives council a full two months for review prior to the study, then all of December to vote. 

The meeting tonight should outline timing, however. 

For reference, in 2017 Venue Solutions said that $293MM needed to be done on the stadium. That number was just materials and did not include labor (a huge cost) and fees for contractors and designers. I assume all in that 2017 # would be closer to $500MM. Add in 5 years of inflation, I imagine we could be over $700MM, which may be the number being discussed. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More info from the meeting last Wed. between the Titans and the East Bank Stadium Committee:
 

While general obligation bonds are backed by property tax dollars, revenue bonds are paid using specifically designated sources of revenue − in this case, hotel and motel tax, and diverted sales tax.

That revenue comes with strings attached:

  • State statutes dictate the proceeds from the 1% hotel occupancy tax must be used for construction costs and debt service for an enclosed stadium or future capital improvements to the stadium
  • All sales tax proceeds from the stadium premises must be used to fund the capital costs for the stadium or debt service
  • The partial sales tax diversion for the yet-to-be-defined 130-acre area surrounding the stadium would fund the capital expenses for the stadium, debt service and infrastructure necessary for the stadium to operate

State law does not provide for a referendum option on revenue bonds, meaning the public will not have the opportunity to vote directly on whether revenue bonds are issued.

Metro can backstop revenue bonds to offer additional security to bondholders if the revenues designated to pay the debt service do not perform as expected. Metro did this with a portion of the bonds for the Convention Center.

"That's a delicate balance because for every backstop we're putting on these special projects, that's another dollar we're taking out of our (general obligation) projects, because you can't pledge the same dollar twice, even though you might not actually be spending it on one of these deals," Metro Finance Director Kelly Flannery said.

Flannery does not intend to have Metro backstop revenue bonds for a new stadium and noted that the Titans have not asked Metro to do so during negotiations.

Due to current economic uncertainty, it is possible that Metro may need to ask the Council to backstop the bonds in a few years, she added.

And because the sales tax revenue sources are new and would not generate revenue until the stadium and surrounding buildings are operational, there could be a need to use alternate funding during the construction phase, like water and sewer payment in lieu of taxes revenue.

"It wouldn't pledge any of those resources to the future debt," Flannery clarified.

While Metro is responsible for maintenance of the existing stadium under its current least with the Titans, it's "unclear at this time" how such operating expenses would be addressed in the new stadium deal, according to special counsel for the Metro Council Office.

Excess funds from revenue bonds beyond what is needed to cover Metro's debt service could be put toward ongoing capital maintenance in accordance with the state's rules for how the hotel occupancy tax and area sales tax revenue can be spent, Wilcox said.

"We would be shifting (responsibility) off of the general fund, and if there were needs above and beyond that, the team would be accepting those responsibilities," he said.

Metro Council, with the approval of the state, will define the 130-acre sales tax boundary. It's not yet clear what will ultimately lie within that area or what public infrastructure would qualify to be funded using excess sales tax revenue dollars earmarked for the stadium and infrastructure needed for the stadium to operate.

The plan being negotiated would also require Metro to build structured parking, which has yet to be defined, as part of its overall contribution. Debt service on that expense is expected to be covered by excess stadium sales tax revenue.

What happens if revenues from the state-designated revenue sources exceed what is needed to cover the debt is yet to be determined.

And if revenues from the hotel occupancy tax and state-designated sales tax diversions far exceed what's needed to cover the debt service and capital maintenance, those excess funds would be unavailable for use toward other public needs.

"It can't go beyond the state-defined allowable use," Flannery said.

More behind the Tennessean paywall here:

https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/local/davidson/2022/09/19/nashville-football-stadium-officials-discuss-revenue-at-heart-of-negotiations/69496533007/
 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
16 minutes ago, MLBrumby said:

$2.1 B for a stationary translucent roof and up to 60,000 seats!?!?  Not even a retractible roof, which Indy built for half the cost?!  They' ve just described the 1964 Astrodome!  

Yeah this is an incredibly disappointing result of all this talking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.