Jump to content

Huge fire


rbdetsport

Recommended Posts


  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Cleanup? Haha. They're still trying to make sure the fire's all out. Judging by the speed of the cleanup after the fire at the Scovel Presbyterian Church that burned back in Febrary, they might start cleaning up the Studebaker mess in a few years. If they determine that the Studebaker fire is arson, they will likely do a much deeper investigation. So who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, although, depending on the structural conditions of the plant, it may be cleaned up a bit earlier than a year. Demolition, even after property has been severly damaged is very expensive. Some of the structures still left standing could be there forever until they fall, or someone decides to redevelop the site. The smokestack will likely stick around for years to come though since it would be expensive to remove.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not too concerned about the difficulties dealing with the smokestack. I've seen redevelopment projects in different cities where the smokestacks were left standing, simply because they are too difficult to demolish, and if they are to be removed, it would cost a ton of money, since they can only be removed with explosive demolition which is very very expensive.. if the Studebaker site is to be redeveloped. The rest of the plant should be removed, and developers can build around what is left standing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm beginning to think that there's a magnetic field or something around smokestacks. It's as if a fire or demolition can level everything else, but those darn smokestacks survive it all. We have an area just south of downtown here that's completely deindustrialized with only a casino replacing part of the blighted area. Other than a high-rise bridge, there are about ten or so old, brick smokestacks rising from nothing. There has to be a reason why everything else can be leveled and carted off but not these silly anachronisms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ That's usually what happens in a fire of that scale, now, had there been a city fire, it may not have been so lucky.

Bricks and concrete, etc. are usually very fire and weather hardy materials. For example, in some parts of South and North GA (outside of the Atlanta metro), you can see old stone/brock chimneys that might be 100+ years old just standing a few feet off the road with no cabin connecting to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Detroit has plenty of ruins, that's for sure. I explore urban ruins every weekend, and am in no danger of running out of locations anytime soon. The city's history is disappearing fast though, which is why it is all the more important that I take the time to photograph the buildings before they are gone forever.

When seeing photos of the smoldering pile of rubble, I am reminded of the motto that appears on the city seal. "Speramus Meliora; Resurget Cineribus" is the city's motto, which is Latin for "We hope for better things; It shall again rise from the ashes." It is just as true today as it was when it was adopted after the fire that burned the city to the ground 200 years ago this month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try securing a building like the Packard Plant. It's easier said than done, that's for sure! Still, they should at least try. Scavengers are all over in there. Portions of the Packard probably are wood-framed. The majority is steel and concrete though.

Scavengers have already decended upon the ruins of the Studebaker Plant. I've seen people pull away with pickup trucks full of bricks, and even more people trying to cart off the heavy steel beams. The whole neighborhood smells awful. There was a 30 ton shipment of meat to the market on Monday, and millions of flies have decended upon the remains.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try securing a building like the Packard Plant.  It's easier said than done, that's for sure!  Still, they should at least try.  Scavengers are all over in there. Portions of the Packard probably are wood-framed.  The majority is steel and concrete though. 

Scavengers have already decended upon the ruins of the Studebaker Plant.  I've seen people pull away with pickup trucks full of bricks, and even more people trying to cart off the heavy steel beams.  The whole neighborhood smells awful.  There was a 30 ton shipment of meat to the market on Monday, and millions of flies have decended upon the remains.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Nothing like grilled meat!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious who owns that site. Was the entire site or just the developed part owned by Piquette Market? I wonder what the owner will do now, other than collect casualty insurance claims. I seriously doubt he'll rebuild, so will this site just sit abandoned like so many others until tax foreclosure by the city? If the owner can't ditch this on to the city, who would buy it? All rhetorical questions I'm sure, but there are many parking and empty lots in that neighborhood...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The city's online tax database (which has not been updated in a couple years) shows that the site occupied by the Studebaker Plant is owned by two separate individuals and is addressed as two separate properties.

The western half of the site (the abandoned half) is addressed as 6230 John R, and is owned by an individual who lives in Detroit. The eastern half (the Piquette Market) is addressed as 285 Piquette, and is owned by someone from Farmington Hills.

The city had plans to demolish the eastern half of the structure, most likely due to the danger of the building, which was near collapse in many places.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Allan. I should've checked the site myself first. D'oh! At this early date, it's probably too much to hope for - expecting any plans for redevelopment or demolition. I read in the FREEP that the city considers that neighborhood to have been "burgeoning" before the fire. There seems to me way too many abandoned lots to warrant that label. Maybe city officials know something I don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a more effective label would have been "showing promise" There is a lot of factories around that area that are actually occupied. In fact, I the only building I found within close proximity to the Studebaker that was abandoned was the Fisher 21 plant. I'm really not sure what's going on with that building, if it's been bought or what, but anyway, that area has really held on well.

Nearby, is a bunch of new apartment buildings. That's probably why the FREEP mentioned it was burgeoning. ... Not quite, but almost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, fortunately, neither the Packard Plant nor Fisher Body 21 will suffer the same fate as the Studebaker facility. From what I understand, the Fisher site is a 3-D grid of reinforced concrete - all of the interior wood was just flooring and has long since rotted away. If the Packard Plant somehow went up in flames, though, it would probably take most of the metro area's FDs to surpress it. But, again, it's another example of a structure that was really made to last. So an attorney sat on an abandoned automobile factory and watched it slowly deteriorate over the years. He/she probably prayed it would one day end up like this for the insurance payment. Sounds like something an attorney would do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.