Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

jlblaes

Census Stats 2000 to 2004

Recommended Posts

Annual Estimates of the Population - Ranked by July 1, 2004 Population

Raleigh Ranked 55

Annual Estimates of the Population for Incorporated Places over 100,000, Ranked by July 1, 2004 Population: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2004

Percent Change Population April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2004 - Ranked by Percent Change

Raleigh Ranked 22

Cumulative Estimates of Population Change for Incorporated Places over 100,000, Ranked by Percent Change: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2004

Percent Change Population July 1, 2003 to July 1, 2004 - Ranked by Percent Change

Raleigh Ranked 24

Annual Estimates of Population Change for Incorporated Places over 100,000, Ranked by Percent Change: July 1, 2003 to July 1, 2004

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


That has less to do with the actual population of the city and more to do with North Carolina's liberal annexation laws.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the percent of change, notice that Raleigh is the first "major" city in the list. Meaning that the other cities do not have the national status that Raleigh holds and that the others are smaller parts of a larger metro. Whereas, Raleigh is the central/largest city in its metro area.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.