winooski more dense than manchester, portland

[pvenne]

City

Population 2000: 6,561

Metro area: Burlington

WINOOSKI VT US

POPULATION

Number Number

Total population 6,561

Square miles (land) 1.43

Population per square mile 4,586.12 65.82 79.56

____________________________________________________________________

City

Population 2000: 64,249

Metro area: Portland

PORTLAND ME US

POPULATION

Number Number

Total population 64,249

Square miles (land) 21.21

Population per square mile 3,029.22 41.31 79.56

____________________________________________________________________

City

Population 2000: 107,006

Metro area: Manchester-Nashua

MANCHESTER NH US

POPULATION

Number Number

Total population 107,006

Square miles (land) 33.01

Population per square mile 3,241.44 137.80 79.56

source: http://www.epodunk.com/cgi-bin/popInfo.php?locIndex=25278

[pvenne]

sorry the formatting on this post is horrible; heres a recap:

winooski: density - 4,586.12

manchester: density - 3,241.44

portland: density - 3,029.22

___________________________________________________________

maine: density - 41.31

vermont: density - 65.82

new hampshire: density - 137.80

___________________________________________________________

U.S. average: density - 79.56

[CoreyPortlandME]

Haha. 1.43 square miles. No wonder.

I've heard that Vatican City is the most dense city in the world.

[pvenne]

Haha. 1.43 square miles. No wonder.

I've heard that Vatican City is the most dense city in the world.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

still...over 6,000 people in roughly one mile is a bit dense for vermont, id say. not many of even the biggest cities in the country average over 5,000 people per square mile.

[BigCityAttitude]

still...over 6,000 people in roughly one mile is a bit dense for vermont, id say.  not many of even the biggest cities in the country average over 5,000 people per square mile.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

A bit dense? No no... That's very dense for Vermont.

[M. Brown]

That is dense.