uptownliving

Jonas Federal Courthouse Renovation

Recommended Posts


I'm fine with historical styling, but why was it necessary to make the street level even less pedestrian friendly than the convention center???

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Federal courthouses are going to be built to be very secure as even here in Charlotte we have had Hezbollah terrorists in a trial.  Lots of barriers around the building too I am sure. That is just the way it is now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Miesian Corners said:

Why are so many people afraid of modernism? 

Because we tore down a lot of buildings for modernism?  And probably more will be coming down along Trade. 

Edited by AirNostrumMAD
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Miesian Corners said:

Why are so many people afraid of modernism? 

This. without the radical changes, Charlotte would resemble Columbia, SC. Charlotte has always been progressive and will continue to be. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, tozmervo said:

Renderings of the Federal Courthouse design are now public. The new tower portion (160-170' tall) covers the entire existing parking lot on the fourth street side. It sets back a bit from Mint street to create a small pocket park at 4th & Mint. The existing historic building will get a complete interior renovation with preservation of the really beautiful old post office lobbies and courtroom. The front yard is getting a complete redesign, too, with some really nice historic nods and relocating the obelisk memorial back to it's original location off Trade Street. Both the new tower and the historic renovation have strong sustainability goals that include achieving LEED v4 Gold. 

jonas.png

This is beautiful.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't get the negative reactions to historicism. Everything else Charlotte is doing is modern. Why not throw in a little blast from the past ?

Uh-oh, does that mean I have to like BOAT ?

 

 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Dale said:

I don't get the negative reactions to historicism. Everything else Charlotte is doing is modern. Why not throw in a little blast from the past ?

Uh-oh, does that mean I have to like BOAT ?

 

 

For the record, I really like the design. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Dale said:

I don't get the negative reactions to historicism. Everything else Charlotte is doing is modern. Why not throw in a little blast from the past ?

Uh-oh, does that mean I have to like BOAT ?

 

 

I don't get it either - especially from a group who frequently laments the destruction of our history. While it may not be "authentic" there is no harm in adding back pieces of what we took away.

A nice mix of modern, classical, etc. is preferable in my opinion. This is not Dubai. We have a history,  we have roots, and it's OK to go back and find them.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, cha said:

 

Yes, suburbia is totally the answer here. Don't know about you, but I like being able to walk to the store, restaurants, and other amenities. Also, a 10min commute to work is totally a upside too. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ beware its an infowars video, clicking on it puts money in the pocket of the guy who says Sandy Hook was "a hoax"

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is classical architecture.  It is contextual.  It is made of quality materials.  It is poorly detailed and too heavy for a building of its size.  Tall buildings made of limestone are difficult to pull off.  This has not pulled it off.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the Secretary of Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties...  Item #10 on the list of 10, and in my opinion one of the most important : "Designs that were never executed historically will not be constructed."

This concept is for the most minute detail all the way up to high rise additions. It is to try and combat false historicism and confusion of what is actually historical and what is not.  It also seeks to increase the importance of actually historical buildings and details by encouraging contemporary design to complement the historical rather than imitate.  Think costume jewelry versus actual gold and opals.  One is a cheap imitation and the other is priceless.  One is worn by an impostor and the other is worn by a queen.

Not saying you have to agree with the concept, but I think that is where a lot of the objection is coming from.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.