Jump to content

QS-1 Headquarters


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I posted that QS/1 has maxed itself out already, and that they regret not building taller. I don't recall if it was originally planned to be taller or not.

At anyrate, building on top of the existring structure would not be practical as the support columns are probably not designed for such weight. I like your thought process though :).

I wouldn't mind if they built a sister building on the county judicial center lot accross the street (allowing for a garage to be shared by the SCJC and QS/1). Perhaps they will build this new one taller and more impressive than the original? ;) Thats just my two cents.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.