Jump to content

Smart Growth Isn't The Answer For Sydney


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

What does she think, that sprawl development won't increase traffic congestion, in fact MUCH more so than infill?

How did I know that Wendell Cox would be quoted somewhere in this article....

Sounds to me like she is very much against density and very much for sprawl.

And the government is trying to be cheap and save money by building on infill land???? Last time I checked thats usually the most expensive way to develop, so I doubt the city is employing smart growth to save money....

As usual, I love the positive mentions of such great urban centers as Atlanta and Dallas from Mr. Cox.... :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.