tombarnes 0 Report post Posted December 17, 2005 From ChicagoBusiness... http://www.chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/mag...rticle_id=25052 What does everyone think of this possibility? In the current market, hotel rooms probably would offer a greater return than offices. Thoughts? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
myrtlesquare 0 Report post Posted December 19, 2005 I wouldn't want to stay in the Hancock Tower out of fear of safety of a terrorist attack. Now knowing what we know, would you have stayed in the World Trade Center? 10 years ago, I probably would've stayed in it, but I wouldn't recommend it now. It has a nice and viable location, however. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Southernyank 4 Report post Posted December 26, 2005 I'd stay in the Hancock, Mostly for the view. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hotlanta 0 Report post Posted February 6, 2006 I wouldn't want to stay in the Hancock Tower out of fear of safety of a terrorist attack. Now knowing what we know, would you have stayed in the World Trade Center? 10 years ago, I probably would've stayed in it, but I wouldn't recommend it now. It has a nice and viable location, however. It is always kind of fun to take a risk! Which hotel might occupy this space if it were converted? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ingersoll1978 1 Report post Posted February 6, 2006 Life is too short to be worrying about a "potential" terrorist attack. We just moved from our condo on the 61st floor on the Hancock Tower to Des Moines, IA. We never really thought about it too much when we lived there. I think you'd have a bigger chance of one of the planes from the Chicago Air Show coming into your window than a 747. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Southernyank 4 Report post Posted February 17, 2006 I would definately love to stay in Hancock. That would be a great experience and the most amazing view. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tombarnes 0 Report post Posted February 17, 2006 I think Starwood has expressed interest in doing something in the building. When I hear of more, I'll be sure to post it here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rbdetsport 0 Report post Posted July 10, 2006 The John Hancock Building has so many uses to it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FromCityToRural 2 Report post Posted July 12, 2006 I could see that. It's already a nice multi-use building, I actually thought it already had a hotel... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mpchicago 289 Report post Posted August 16, 2006 The latest word is that the current owners are exploring possibilities of selling the building. Stay tuned. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
UptownNewOrleans 1 Report post Posted September 1, 2006 Chicago has some beautiful skyscrapers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mpchicago 289 Report post Posted December 12, 2006 Shorenstien Properties is selling the Hancock to Goldman Sachs. Crain's Chicago Business says Goldman is paying $385mm. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jdkacz 50 Report post Posted January 8, 2007 Shorenstien Properties is selling the Hancock to Goldman Sachs. Crain's Chicago Business says Goldman is paying $385mm. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
