Martinman 86 Report post Posted December 25, 2005 2005 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) 2004 1 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV (MSA) 3 2 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA (MSA) 2 3 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC (MSA) 1 4 Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro, TN (MSA) 7 5 Birmingham-Hoover, AL (MSA) 6 6 Salt Lake City, UT (MSA) 17 7 Madison, WI (MSA) 13 8 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI (MSA) 8 9 Denver-Aurora, CO (MSA) 4 10 Kansas City, MO-KS (MSA) 10 11 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ (MSA) 14 12 Columbus, OH (MSA) 18 13 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX (MSA) 12 14 Indianapolis, IN (MSA) 20 15 Des Moines, IA (MSA) 28 16 Reno-Sparks, NV (MSA) 33 17 Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH (MSA) 26 18 Richmond, VA (MSA) 19 19 Raleigh-Cary, NC (MSA) 9 20 Green Bay, WI (MSA) 27 Policom Ranking Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The_sandlapper 0 Report post Posted December 25, 2005 I posted these rankings a couple of weeks ago here. I guess it was the 2004 rankings. Anyway not very many people were happy with the rankings. I found it interesting though. Columbia still had the strongest economic ranking in SC this year too I see. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
krazeeboi 173 Report post Posted December 25, 2005 Interestingly, most metropolitan areas in the Carolinas slipped a few spots in the 2005 rankings, the only exceptions being Greensboro-High Point, Goldsboro, and Fayetteville. Charlotte only fell 2 spots, but Florence fell 43 spots. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ironchapman 2 Report post Posted December 26, 2005 Atlanta ranks 2nd? Wow..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lady Celeste 68 Report post Posted December 29, 2005 I'm glad to see that many cities in the south doing so well. I'm really glad to see Atlanta metro doing so well in spite of the economic one two punch she has faced in the last five years. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
