Jump to content

Stadium District


hood

Recommended Posts

I started this to give a complete project overview of the Stadium district. I have found higher resolution renderings, a siteplan and floor plans.

Michigan elevation

StadiumDistrictMichelev.jpg

Larch elevation

StadiumDistrictLarchelev.jpg

Site Plan

StadiumDistrictsiteplan.jpg

First floor plan

StadiumDistrict1stflrplan.jpg

Fourth floor plan

StadiumDistrict4thflrplan.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I might be an amature, but I think this is an absulutely perfect project for it's location. Visually appealing, and on a honest scale, I think it's going to be a great addition to downtown Lansing. However...it seems like quite a bit of parking for a complex of it's size. Is there going to be public parking included for Lansing Center and Olds Park events or what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For now there will just be a surface lot, that will take up the entire area that shows a surface lot on the site plan and they area origionaly proposed for a city parking ramp. Hovever, in the agreement between the city and Gillespi the city retains the right to build a parking ramp sometime in the future, and it will be needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason there is so much parking in the plan is because as Hood said, the city wanted the developer to build a parking ramp for the city of Lansing which they'd lease, I believe. They wanted to make up for the parking that will be lost with the building on this site. But as Hood said, for the immediate future, there will only be a surface lot behind the building. It seems Mr. Gillespie was able to talk the city out of making him build their parking garage. lol I do appreciate the city finally getting the courage to ask things of developers, though. So often, declined cities are so hungry for ANY type of development that they don't even bother to ask more of developers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just hope they don't take too long in constructing the ramp because there is already not enough parking in the area. As it is when there are games business' charge to park in their lots and some people have to walk from a few blocks away. If more business' remain open later parking will really become a problem for games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, this is definitely one area of the city that MUST have a least one, large parking structure. Currently, the only large-scale parking place on the Eastbank (that's a name I want to catch on, lol) IS the lot that the Stadium District is going on. And game days really are horrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is to begin contruction in early spring, probably march. It will be in the parking lot directly south of the Lugnuts Stadium, It will take up the entire length of that block along Michigan Ave. and will also run about 1/4 block along Larch and Cedar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is to begin contruction in early spring, probably march. It will be in the parking lot directly south of the Lugnuts Stadium, It will take up the entire length of that block along Michigan Ave. and will also run about 1/4 block along Larch and Cedar.

TY :D

Does Gillespie have a website for this? I'm gonna go check it out next time I make it to lansing. Oh yeah, are these condos or apartments?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I know he does not yet have a website for this, but when he does I'm sure he will link it to this page, it's his lansing property listing. There is a somewhat in-depth real estate listing for the commercial space here.

This will be a mix of 40 apartments on the second and third floors and 18 condos on the fourth floor, of course the ground floor will be commercial space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have found a new rendering of the Stadium District and the design has changed drastically. I'm not sure if I like the new one as much as the old, I'll have to wait for higher resolution rendering before I make that decision. I do like that the fourth floor will be a full height floor now and it appears that the roof top will be utilized (notice the trees) and there will be balconies. This is definately more realistic of a design than the old one, which to me almost looked toyish.

62B0304F-5A9E-434F-9EE9-0AE4F0C9B075.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Signature Associates isn't handling the Stadium District anymore, CBRE is. I contacted CBRE yesterday wondering if they will post the larger rendering to their website or if they can send it to me, the current "enlarge" link doesn't work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I now have a larger rendering and floorplans for the project. In the floorplans Michigan is at the bottom, Cedar on the right and Larch on the left.:

Looking South:

NewStadiumDistrict.jpg

Site Plan:

Stadiumdistrictplans.jpg

First and second floor:

StadiumDistrict1-2flr.jpg

3/4 floor and roof:

StadiumDistrict3-4-roof.jpg

I'm starting to like the exterior design more, assuming they will use brick not that stuff like on Prudden Place. It also will be taller than the origional proposal, it appears to be between 70 and 80 ft tall. However, I'm very dissapointed in the first floor layout. The proposed space calls for a coffee shop and retail space, which is fine, but also includes a bank with drivethru and a gym. A gym and bank do nothing at the street level, a bank still coses early and does not draw people in off the street. The gym also does nothing at a street level and it is proposed to take up nearly half the first floor. If anything, dump the second floor office space, put the gym up there and allow a resturaunt or retail to have the first floor space. Also, the building will now not go along Cedar or Larch at all, which is also dissapointing, I really don't know what to think of this project. Also I contacted someone at CBRE and I may be getting more and/or better renderings soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats what I'm thinking, I'm just not sure if thats what will happen. If they do end up building seperate buildings along Larch and/or Cedar it will be much better off, but if they just end up building a big parking ramp that would obviously be bad. That's why I really don't know what to think about it, I cant decide what to think about this project, theres plenty of good and bad about it. But at least it will look nice from Michigan Ave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a gym is a great idea, they are used heavily and many are opened 24 hours.

I'm very disappointed to see them take away the Cedar/Larch wing(s), though. I just can't help but to think that if Mr. Gillespie would take a bit more of a risk it would pay off. I mean, add two more stories and utilize the space behind it for another retail annex and consolidate the parking into a small, two-floor parking garage until they can expand it otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A gym would be best suited for the second floor though, it doesn't do anything at street level. I was really hoping to see at least a small portion opened up to two floors to allow for a nice micro brewery. In the original design the building would have had an small two story opened up portion at the Cedar end of it. I was also thinking that not having the Cedar and Larch wings may be good, it will allow for the possible construction of new buildings, maybe taller ones (around 6 floors). Then they could build a 6-7 floor ramp behind it all. I suppose it's a remote possibility, but it would be nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.