Jump to content

Lowell v. Worcester


LowellMass

Recommended Posts

There's some good discussion regarding the Plan E form of government. There couldn't be a more compelling argument for it than Lowell v. Lawrence. Downtown Lawrence looks like a bomb hit it, Lowell has a new ballpark, new arena, artists, lots of new condos. Anyone who talks about crime in Lowell is living in the 80's.

I don't think downtown Worcester is at where downtown Lowell is today, but they seem to be moving in the right direction.

http://www.ci.worcester.ma.us/inthenews.htm

MassINC CommonWealth Growth & Development Extra - 2006

Urban Re-Renewal - by Shaun Sutner (PDF 799KB)

No longer the mothballed commercial and industrial districts of a time gone by, downtowns in Lowell and Worcester are emerging as places to live and play. Read more...

http://www.ci.worcester.ma.us/dev/pdf/UrbanRe-Renewal.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Worcester is most defininitely a middle class city. Most areas in the city are middle class with the lower mid and poor area popping up as in any city.....But the middle, upper middle and wealthy area prevail in Worcester without a doubt. As to the downtown.....its changing....the few urban extension area off of downtown have taken off, and downtown itself is next....wait and see

Probably NOT going to be a popular view but...

I wouldn't get too excited about Downtown Worcester. The pictures look nice, but they still aren't doing much in the way of encouraging anything new downtown. And they are not doing much to improve the economic situation there, either. Worcester is a bit different than Lowell, which has a good public college right downtown, and is a major commuter city for Boston. Worcester doesn't have the nearby college community, people avoid the downtown area, and the city itself is primarily an imigrant/lower to lower middle class city.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Worcester is most defininitely a middle class city. Most areas in the city are middle class with the lower mid and poor area popping up as in any city.....But the middle, upper middle and wealthy area prevail in Worcester without a doubt. As to the downtown.....its changing....the few urban extension area off of downtown have taken off, and downtown itself is next....wait and see

After reading the report it appears that Worcester is finally trying to develop it's own brand. It needs that. Sure, it'll never be Boston or Providence, but that's because it's not Boston or Providence. Worcester has many great assets and it seems like it might be finally working them to it's advantage. This whole inferiority complex is old and not well deserved. It need not be in anyone's shadow. Having lived there for many years I will admit that I'm a bit on edge about this new development as so many have failed in the past, but this time things seem a bit more promising.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After reading the report it appears that Worcester is finally trying to develop it's own brand. It needs that. Sure, it'll never be Boston or Providence, but that's because it's not Boston or Providence.

KRC, I think that's the best that's been written here about Worcester. You are damn right there. When you talk to people about Worcester, you always hear "yes, Worcester is on the move, but it will never be like Boston or Providence". Well, Providence is not like Boston, Harford is not like Providence and that's how it should be, every city has its own character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I work in Worcester and definitely think it's an underrated city. In comparison to Providence, yes it's not as pretty (although much of Providence is no prettier than much of Worcester) and Worcester is much more spread out to the point of being suburban in several areas. Providence also has more of a hip college feel: Brown and RISD are more progressive and dynamic than Worcester's colleges (good though they may be) and they're right next to each other which enables them to create a critical mass of energy. But on the plus side, Worcester has better public schools and better delivery of govt services. I think these issues jeopardize Providence's "Renaissance" (fancy restaurants and luxury condos only go so far) while Worcester does much better in terms of these fundamentals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.