Jump to content

Can Detroit afford its City Council?


Ramcharger

Recommended Posts


  • Replies 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

i think the city would be better off if we had 9 coins and just decided on things by throwing them in the air and counting heads and tails....

One side of me keeps saying just to let it keep going down this track to doomsday, a state takeover could be what the city needs with such inept leadership. What does everyone else think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im amazed, well actually I shouldnt be. I think the answer is very clear. Elect the members by district. I believe Cockrel Jr. was quoted in the piece saying that much of his work is due to the fact that he has to oversee the whole city. Solution: give him a certain area to watch over. Less staff, less cost, and the way im thinking more voices will get heard if hes representing a specific area. After looking at all the salary numbers which put Detroit ahead of places like New York and Chicago im starting to think that a state takeover might just be what this place needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michi hit on a point that I wanted to talk about, and that is that Detroit City Council is one of the highest paid in the country, which is just criminal considering the state of the city's finances. I propose and immediate pay cut. They need to change the council as if it was just a part time job. For instance, Lansing City Council is pretty much a part time job layout with the council members being paid $20,000, which the president of the council being paid another $1,000, or so. I don't think that the fact that Detroit is a "big city" should mean any different. It kind of weeds out those looking to get into local politics for the money. I hope they all remember what happened to Nero. BTW, the cost of leadership in Detroit is just staggering. I had no idea it was that much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im amazed, well actually I shouldnt be. I think the answer is very clear. Elect the members by district. I believe Cockrel Jr. was quoted in the piece saying that much of his work is due to the fact that he has to oversee the whole city. Solution: give him a certain area to watch over. Less staff, less cost, and the way im thinking more voices will get heard if hes representing a specific area. After looking at all the salary numbers which put Detroit ahead of places like New York and Chicago im starting to think that a state takeover might just be what this place needs.

Very intersting quote. It makes a lot of sense and it is no surprise that it came from one of the Cockrels. Both Ken and Sheila seem to be what is right with the City Council. Remember that in the initial zoo vote, it was 7-2... old guard 7, cockrels 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very intersting quote. It makes a lot of sense and it is no surprise that it came from one of the Cockrels. Both Ken and Sheila seem to be what is right with the City Council. Remember that in the initial zoo vote, it was 7-2... old guard 7, cockrels 2.

The Cockrels seem to be the only ones that are still somewhat in touch with reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a much smaller scale, the State takeover of Flint was what that city needed. A 30 million dollar deficit when the state tookover and today, being out of recievership (basically) they finally have a budget surplus of a couple million bucks. Everyone hated it, but it worked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.