Jump to content

I-26 Connector


Recommended Posts

They really may be correct about this one; eight lanes does seem like it might be a waste of land and money.


I've never heard anybody dispute the need for a new bridge over the river to take I-26 traffic off of the Bowen Bridge and bypass the terrible double weave and left exit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can also make an Excel spreadsheet of AADT, except with the most recent data (2013), change the font from default Calibri, AND get the years right in the title.




I'm seeing a pretty solid post-recession increase in traffic. But, Section A is still over-kill. NCDOT was forecasting a surge in traffic on I-240 when they opened I-26 to Tennessee, and it never happened. After a decade, the traffic volume at the state line is only 10,000 vehicles per day. There are more cars on the primary two-lane road in my podunk home county.


The biggest argument opponents have made regarding widening I-240 to eight lanes is that the majority of the corridor will be more than eight lanes. With so many exits in close proximity, there will be numerous auxiliary lanes between exits, creating large sections with ten lanes. It's way too much. However, it looks like a lot of the R/W acquisition is taking place around the interchanges, which are currently horrible. Six lanes or eight, the interchanges will still be brought up to modern standards and will have the horizontal clearance to accommodate eight lanes, which takes up a lot of real estate. Regardless of the number of lanes chosen, it's going to be a costly project that people aren't going to like.


I cannot figure out why there hasn't been more of a push for Section B, the bridge. That's where the highest traffic volumes are and the most wrecks occur, not to mention the piss-poor design. Delays on I-240 are typically a result of incidents and congestion at the bridge. The previous administration brought the I-240 widening back from the dead after the connector ranked low in the urban loop prioritization results, but it's not the most needed segment.


I also cannot figure out why I-240 is proposed to be eight lanes with its current, relatively low traffic counts, when I-26 south of Asheville is slated to only be widened from four to six lanes and already has 72,000-80,000 vehicles daily between the airport and I-40 interchange. That's the same amount of traffic as currently six-lane and proposed to be eight-lanes I-85 between US 321 and US 74 west of Gastonia, and already eight-lanes I-85 through Salisbury. I-26 will need to be widened again by the time it's widened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I-26 into Tennessee is not a very good through route since it ends at the Virginia state line. It's the best way to get from Asheville, Hendersonville, or Waynesville to the Northeast. It doesn't really serve as a primary route for anything else.


If US-25 between the NC/SC state line and Greenville were converted to a freeway, then I-85->I-26->I-81 would become a reasonable alternate route from Atlanta to the Northeast.

If I-26 is ever completed to Columbus then it would take on more importance as a primary route between Ohio and the Southeast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.