Jump to content

Little Rock Zoo


Recommended Posts

I found some drawings online. It looks like a remodel of one of the current buildings (primate house or reptile house?). Could it be a new building incorporating the same original stone as the WPA projects? I know they are currently working on the African Veldt and a new entrance is completed or near so. They're somewhere in the fundraising stage for a Penguin House. This seems to be a restaurant, or at least part of it is...

sk3a.jpg

sk15a.jpg

sk17a.jpg

sk12a.jpg

sk10a.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Let's hope that turns out better than the "new" entrance, which to me is an embarrassment. The whole zoo "had" this cool, 1930's stone CCC vernacular going, and we end up with some hokey, vinyl-sided, plastic-windowed, farm-house entry thingy. It has a "kelley" green roof (which went out of style, what, 15 years ago? Or..was it ever in style?). No joking aside, that should never have been built as a city public works project with such poor building materials. That building has a 15-20 year lifespan, which is throw-away construction.

I'll give the architects the benefit of the doubt and chalk it up to a poor budget, but someone at the zoo or city should have set higher standards than that. Want an example of a exceptional city project? Look no further than across the street at the War Memorial Fitness Center and Pool. That should have been the standard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's hope that turns out better than the "new" entrance, which to me is an embarrassment. The whole zoo "had" this cool, 1930's stone CCC vernacular going, and we end up with some hokey, vinyl-sided, plastic-windowed, farm-house entry thingy. It has a "kelley" green roof (which went out of style, what, 15 years ago? Or..was it ever in style?). No joking aside, that should never have been built as a city public works project with such poor building materials. That building has a 15-20 year lifespan, which is throw-away construction.

I'll give the architects the benefit of the doubt and chalk it up to a poor budget, but someone at the zoo or city should have set higher standards than that. Want an example of a exceptional city project? Look no further than across the street at the War Memorial Fitness Center and Pool. That should have been the standard.

I agree, the new entrance is simply awful. I have no idea what they were thinking. The original concrete entrance was weird and outdated but I preferred it. I just hope it will be destroyed when the zoo is expanded.

As much of the zoo as possible should imitate the original WPA stone. Like you said, the pool and fitness center do and so does the stone trim and entrance to War Memorial Park. I'd love to see improvements to the stadium in that stone but that's expensive and it's probably a little late for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

That big gift to the Little Rock Zoo we mentioned yesterday is $775,000 from the Laura P. Nichols Foundation, details on the jump.

ZOO NEWS RELEASE

The Arkansas Zoological Foundation announced today that the Little Rock Zoo has received the largest gift in its 80-year history.

A gift in the amount of $775,000 was made by the Laura P. Nichols Foundation to the Arkansas Zoological Foundation for naming rights to two exhibits and a special earmark for education programming. The first $300,000 of the gift will give naming rights for a new African Penguin habitat at the Zoo. Another $300,000 will give naming rights to a new cheetah exhibit. The final $150,000 has been earmarked for conservation education outreach programs.

The Laura P. Nichols Foundation had already given $25,000 to name a penguin at the new African Penguin exhibit prior to making the larger gift of $750,000.

Zoo director, Mike Blakely, said the gift is the largest gift the Little Rock Zoo has ever received and sets a new standard of giving for the Zoo. "The Nichols Family has set a new path for the Zoo with this incredible contribution. This gift shows that the Little Rock Zoo is deserving of large donations and we are grateful to the Laura P. Nichols Foundation for this wonderful contribution," said Blakely.

At an 11:30 am press conference at Caf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...
I took my kid on Friday. It looks like they are almost finished and it should be pretty nice. There's a nice meandering boardwalk with lots of viewing stations. There was a decent amount of construction on the zoo when we went there.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • 1 month later...

Additionally, they were reporting on KARN this morning about a coming battle over the future of Ray Winder Field. Apparently, several of the city board members (Stacy Hurst, etc.) support buying the property for the zoo for expansion (which I wholeheartedly support), while the city wants to retain the ballpark...for some reason.

Here's the thing...the zoo is the number one tourist destination in the city...more than the Clinton Library. It needs help. Serious help, and it could be a great asset. I'm all for preserving Arkansas Heritage, but there is no jewel in the rough in Ray Winder. There is history there, just no architectural history. I see no value whatsoever in retaining or investing money in it when this valuable land could radically alter the zoo for the better.

It's funny...LR saw no reason to invest any money in the ballpark (or push for a new one) when the Travelers were there, and NOW they want to do something. It's mind-boggling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Additionally, they were reporting on KARN this morning about a coming battle over the future of Ray Winder Field. Apparently, several of the city board members (Stacy Hurst, etc.) support buying the property for the zoo for expansion (which I wholeheartedly support), while the city wants to retain the ballpark...for some reason.

Here's the thing...the zoo is the number one tourist destination in the city...more than the Clinton Library. It needs help. Serious help, and it could be a great asset. I'm all for preserving Arkansas Heritage, but there is no jewel in the rough in Ray Winder. There is history there, just no architectural history. I see no value whatsoever in retaining or investing money in it when this valuable land could radically alter the zoo for the better.

It's funny...LR saw no reason to invest any money in the ballpark (or push for a new one) when the Travelers were there, and NOW they want to do something. It's mind-boggling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Additionally, they were reporting on KARN this morning about a coming battle over the future of Ray Winder Field. Apparently, several of the city board members (Stacy Hurst, etc.) support buying the property for the zoo for expansion (which I wholeheartedly support), while the city wants to retain the ballpark...for some reason.

Here's the thing...the zoo is the number one tourist destination in the city...more than the Clinton Library. It needs help. Serious help, and it could be a great asset. I'm all for preserving Arkansas Heritage, but there is no jewel in the rough in Ray Winder. There is history there, just no architectural history. I see no value whatsoever in retaining or investing money in it when this valuable land could radically alter the zoo for the better.

It's funny...LR saw no reason to invest any money in the ballpark (or push for a new one) when the Travelers were there, and NOW they want to do something. It's mind-boggling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
There was a photo in the paper, and it caught my eye by the sheer size of the crowds...pretty impressive.

I still remember when the zoo was free of charge when I was younger (and I'm only 40). I can say "only" with "40" right? ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.