Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

kayman

Discussion: Judicial Elections

Judicial Elections   4 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the current system be replaced

    • Yes, and we should justices appointed
      2
    • Yes, but we should have non-partisan elections
      2
    • No, it is fine as it is
      0

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

6 posts in this topic

Editorial from the Birmingham News about the state's judiciary selection process

The topic of the judiciary selection process in the state has become more prominent than ever since both State Chief Justice of the Supreme Court has the most expansive judiciary election in the country. We should have an open discussion on our current system on whether it should or shouldn't be thrown out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


State considers new way to pick judges

It seems that there are 2 bills both in the State House and Legislature to change the judicial elections in the state from partisan to nonpartisan elections/appointment system.

However, opponents like Mike DeBow of the Stamford's Cumberland School of Law, is saying that partisan election is the voters' way of controlling judges.

"They can vote for judges with judicial philosophies closer to their own, lowering the chances that state judges will engage in judicial activism," he said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 'hybrid' method sounds best to me, with non-partisan retention elections every 4 or 6 years: the Governor appoints, the Legislature confirms, the voters retain. Selecting candidates would still be wrought with politics, of course, and mediocre judges could still make it through, but at least they're not standing in partisan elections or appointed for life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We don't elect federal judges, why should we elect state judges?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would tell why "they" say "why", but I don't have the energy or the brain power to type out that b******t. I'll just sum it up in one sentence: "They want justices that up hold the Alabama morals and values."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sue Bell Cobb wants PAC money banned in all state judiciary races

On Thursday before the Rotary Club of Birmingham, State Chief Justice Sue Bell Cobb has called for the limiting of campaign contributions to $250 and all out ban on PAC funds in state court and judiciary races. She also called for including merit appointments for judicial vacancies and nonpartisan races for sitting appeals court judges. The proposed reforms would promote judicial independence, which is crucial to the justice system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.