Jump to content

Downtown Projects & Developments


Spartan

Recommended Posts

This morning for their 75th anniversary, the Spartanburg County Foundation announced The Robert Hett Chapman III Center for Philanthropy, which will be constructed at 431 Kennedy Street (old Hardees site). The Center for Philanthropy, the first of its kind in South Carolina, will be a space where nonprofits can come and collaborate.  I'm sure there will be even more info to come.  Here are some renderings from their Facebook page:

961947127_SCFCenterforPhilanthropy.thumb.jpg.f914bf77388f3d3d3c7e4a5ffe4eb1f9.jpg

47092740_10157031298459114_4166908856045142016_o.thumb.jpg.38e80be1a97c3a14740c668dd057c7c9.jpg

47058546_10157031298309114_1825949824852164608_o.thumb.jpg.5f0b5c795ea08c886f96fed6cd5e95cb.jpg

47169782_10157031298149114_4934304282162757632_o.thumb.jpg.5419c8f08539cdd9958ef8d3c23dd6ac.jpg

Edited by westsider28
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 1 month later...

Some random DT updates:

The SCF Center mentioned above will go before the DRB for preliminary review and comment at their January 7th meeting.  The Silver Hill housing will also be back for final approval.  No Cambria on the agenda.

Also the City posted a photo yesterday of 142 Social, which is currently roofless.  Interesting that they're doing so much work here when they don't yet have final approval from the DRB (only conceptual).

49196462_2338926396118777_2590852168483340288_n.jpg.c0ca15b758b68daad7733e339d39c8c8.jpg

Not actually downtown, but there are 3 new homes being built in Converse Heights on long-vacant lots. Nice to see infill like that.

1782169224_CHhomesites.JPG.3aecdc1792332e8521ba218bf8dcc134.JPG1991013826_CHhomesite.JPG.a106ee07511787efdd524e0a84440202.JPG

Edit: Also, the Converse alumni house that was planned to be converted to apartments a while ago may be back in play.  John Montgomery is requesting a rezoning of the home and the vacant lot next door from R-6 and LOD to R-6: Planned Development District.

conv.JPG.c6f1f6d71acc3c05eaddd22832c56375.JPG

Edited by westsider28
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, crap.

According to that PDF, there's too much water damage to make restoration of the current house feasible. (Aside: IMO, we need more mechanisms to promote historic preservation, whether that's more incentives or demolition bans. Maybe not as strict as Charleston, but along those lines.)

As for the proposed "pocket neighborhood", I'm not a fan.   The curb-cut on East Main which seems unnecessary.  And also, the homes' orientations ignore Main, which should be the primary frontage.  Hard pass on this proposal.

From PDF:

mainmills1.JPG.599ee3ed4bd23862555e9b5e62b0ec28.JPG

mainmills2.JPG.3972fd3a6bb9411a44e90ad2b586d6de.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

142 Social will be seeking final approval at the February 5th DRB meeting.  Preliminary design from several months ago is below.  I hope they've refined it a bit since then.

1043797172_142Social-Magside.jpg.0e0d230dc3ec38cbd881ea89fa2254e9.jpg

Also, a restoration/redevelopment of 158 East Main will be presented for preliminary review and comment at the February 5th DRB meeting.  This is the Kosch & Gray Jewelers building.  Hopefully they will be removing the hideous storefront facade, opening the upper-floor windows, and repainting it.   That would finally make the whole Walker & Amos building look more cohesive and attractive.

IMG_1079.thumb.JPG.2a91d81182684ce819a2438247243172.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, westsider28 said:

142 Social will be seeking final approval at the February 5th DRB meeting.  Preliminary design from several months ago is below.  I hope they've refined it a bit since then.

1043797172_142Social-Magside.jpg.0e0d230dc3ec38cbd881ea89fa2254e9.jpg

Also, a restoration/redevelopment of 158 East Main will be presented for preliminary review and comment at the February 5th DRB meeting.  This is the Kosch & Gray Jewelers building.  Hopefully they will be removing the hideous storefront facade, opening the upper-floor windows, and repainting it.   That would finally make the whole Walker & Amos building look more cohesive and attractive.

IMG_1079.thumb.JPG.2a91d81182684ce819a2438247243172.JPG

The Kosch & Gray building is equally hideous on the inside!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

142 Social was approved; same design as previously shown. Meh, it's okay.

For the Kosch & Gray building, they're planning to remove the ugly facade, remove the paint (going for bare brick), and un-brick the windows.  Kosch & Gray will close (the owner's retiring) so the retail spot will be available, and there will be one 2BR apartment on each upper floor (2 total units).  Interestingly, they're proposing the apartments be recessed several feet within the existing building shell, creating balconies on Main (the existing "windows" will be open to the "balconies" within).  I hope that makes sense.  I'd prefer them to be true windows (frames and glass) and nix the balconies, but this plan is still an improvement over current conditions.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, westsider28 said:

142 Social was approved; same design as previously shown. Meh, it's okay.

For the Kosch & Gray building, they're planning to remove the ugly facade, remove the paint (going for bare brick), and un-brick the windows.  Kosch & Gray will close (the owner's retiring) so the retail spot will be available, and there will be one 2BR apartment on each upper floor (2 total units).  Interestingly, they're proposing the apartments be recessed several feet within the existing building shell, creating balconies on Main (the existing "windows" will be open to the "balconies" within).  I hope that makes sense.  I'd prefer them to be true windows (frames and glass) and nix the balconies, but this plan is still an improvement over current conditions.

Hate the balcony idea. Like really hate it, but you're right, anything is an improvement over the current. Fingers crossed they 86 the balconies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 1Spartanburg said:

Do you know who owns the K and Gray building? We’re you at the DRB meeting?

Yes, I was there.  The DRB agenda said "Champion Investment Corporation" is the owner, who I believe have owned the building for decades (unfortunately, GIS isn't showing correct sales dates at the moment).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This came In an email from the Change .org petiotion to save Cleveland Hall.
 
PETITION UPDATE

Progress is happening thanks to your support

FEB 8, 2019 — 

The developer reached out to us to let us know he is in the process of negotiating the sale of the house. The purchaser is planning to restore the house and likely live there. The developer will release the details of the transaction within the next few weeks and we will share them with you. This is the best possible outcome for which we are truly grateful to the developer.

Thanks again for your support

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This house has the benefit of being right next to (in) the most involved and influential neighborhood in Spartanburg, which gives it a much better chance of being saved.  Glad to hear things are looking positive for its preservation.  Hope that indeed happens.

Edited by westsider28
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

GDJ may be up to something, not sure. I was going down E. Main St. today and noticed that soil borings were being done

on the B of A site that he owns just past the Denny's tower. Hopefully, this means that he is planning something soon on

that site. I don't know of any past business that would have potential contaminates there, such as a gas station etc. that

would  necessitate soil samples. Lets keep our fingers crossed.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.