Jump to content

Leland Speed tells Mississippi why factories aren't the answer


tennreb

Recommended Posts

Hip To Be Square

The Memphis Flyer

By MARY CASHIOLA

Real estate entrepreneur Leland Speed was once told that "certain sermons are best delivered by a visiting minister." And so it was that the Jackson, Mississippi, native found himself in a Hernando church last week, talking to a visiting "congregation" about selling good design.

"You've got to have a town that's attractive or no one is going to live there," he said. "Quality sells today. Commodity ... Having linear streets and you think you're creative because you threw in a cul-de-sac, that's history. That's 30-years-ago kind of stuff."

Until recently, Speed was head of the Mississippi Development Authority, a statewide agency charged with economic development. He is also a consultant with the city of Jackson. And, as members of the Memphis regional branch of the Urban Land Institute (ULI) sat on pews, Speed talked about the economic benefits of citywide curb appeal.

When Speed came back to Mississippi after more than two decades away, "frankly, I wasn't real happy with the stuff I saw," he said. "I remembered small, vibrant communities. I came back to find dead communities."

People kept asking him when he was going to bring their town a factory. But, to Speed, that's the old way of thinking.

To prove his point, Speed told a tale of two towns. One "won the lottery": An auto assembly plant relocated there. The other didn't get anything of the sort but eventually had to declare a moratorium on building permits because it was growing too fast. The town with the factory didn't.

"What are those two towns? Canton and Oxford," Speed said. "You can say it was the university, but eight out of 10 university towns do not grow inordinately."

So what was it? Speed traced Oxford's growth back to the opening of Square Books.

"What it is is the square. The university is an amenity to the square, not the other way around. People go to the square every day," he said. "The square is magic."

And Canton? "Canton is not viewed as an attractive place to live so people don't live there," he said.

In a world of PILOTs, tax incentives, NAFTA, and the creative class, urban leaders are beginning to understand that atmosphere can be just as important as industry for an area's fiscal health.

Speed advised communities to deal with their "cruel realities," "quit worrying about what you don't have," and "focus on what you have." A city doesn't have the best school system? It might matter less than you think. Citing the rising number of single people in the United States, Speed said, "Where do single people want to live? Do they want an acre lot? ... No."

In fact, Speed thinks the defining factor is whether a city is cool or not. "The trends are in our direction," he said. "We need to use our creativity and culture as an asset."

Unfortunately, he was talking about Mississippi, but I think this applies to Memphis, as well. Memphis has an authenticity that can be leveraged in a world of Wal-Marts and Costcos. But Memphis also needs to prove that it's a great place to live. Or a cool place to live, as the case may be.

Speed spoke of Pascagoula, a Mississippi town on the Gulf with roughly 11,000 shipyard employees.

"Ten percent of the employees live in Pascagoula," Speed said. "Twenty-five percent live in Mobile. Mississippi residents are paying taxes to bring jobs to Mobile. How long should taxpayers subsidize that situation?"

The converse is if Marion, Arkansas, had won the Toyota plant that eventually went to Tupelo, Mississippi, some of those workers surely would have lived in Memphis. But some of them also might have lived in DeSoto County.

Cities aren't just competing for companies anymore; they're competing for workers. For inhabitants. For those people who make a house

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Leland Speed's words ring true. Winning the lottery with an automobile plant is great, but so is creating and maintaining a suitable place to live. I also like his phrase about working with what you have already to make a place attractive and liveable. Canton actually has a pretty town square, but most of the rest of the town has succumbed to sprawl. Oxford has managed its sprawl factor better. I just hope this large new hotel in Oxford, the Ava, isn't too ugly. I'm very afraid from the renderings I've seen so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's going to be pretty nice. Anything in that part of town will be an improvement. It's pretty run down (there's a jail and the relative ghetto). The million dollar condos they are building across the street aren't very attractive, either, but they're better than the run down shuttered bar that was there. There's going to be a nicer hotel on the site of the Church of Christ (North Lamar). They were going to build it behind city hall in a deal with the town to build parking in exchange for land, but the owner of the Downtown Inn sued. Now the jackass is going to have the hotel directly across the street from his, and they're tearing down a beautiful church to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any more info.? What church is being destroyed? Yikes. I'm also curious about the other hotel...any info. would be great. I have heard rumors about another hotel and hope that it might be more architecturally significant than the Ava which looks like a Ramada that took vitamins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any more info.? What church is being destroyed? Yikes. I'm also curious about the other hotel...any info. would be great. I have heard rumors about another hotel and hope that it might be more architecturally significant than the Ava which looks like a Ramada that took vitamins.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is the hotel that is being developed by the developers of The Alluvian and will have a Viking Culinary Institute. The church is the Oxford Church of Christ, the stone church on the west side of North Lamar across from the Downtown Inn.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really surprised to see that they would allow this to be destroyed. I hope its replacement won't look anything like the Ava. Talk about misplaced priorities! I'm also surprised that the developers of the Alluvian would participate in a project which destroys, rather than saves, a significant structure. Does anyone know what the name of the new hotel will be? I've had no luck finding out much about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.