Jump to content

Charlotte Mecklenburg Election Predictions


monsoon

Charlotte Mecklenburg Election Predictions  

57 members have voted

  1. 1. McCroy Re-Elected

    • No
      2
    • Yes
      55
  2. 2. CMS Bond Package Passed

    • No
      10
    • Yes
      47
  3. 3. Transit Tax Repeal?

    • Will be Passed (tax eliminated)
      7
    • Will be Defeated (tax remains)
      50
  4. 4. Voter Turnout

    • Lower than average
      18
    • Higher than average
      39


Recommended Posts

Since this is a slow day, I've decided to create a topic just to predict what you will think is going to happen in the upcoming election. Though I have created a poll, please feel free to add anymore in the topic that you think are relevant.

Here are my predictions.

McCroy - Will be re-elected. Charlotte is happy with the current status quo

School Bonds - Will be passed. There is no organized opposition to it even though nobody is happy with CMS and the school system continues to have very poor results.

Transit Tax Repeal - Will fail. The marketing blitz which includes televised ads, endless postal mailings, and endorsements from local Charlotte notables such as the owner of the Panthers is the best that money can buy. This is most important in American politics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I agree down the line, Metro.

I also think that turnout will be higher than in pasts. Maybe it's just me and the topics with the light rail are so heavily expressed here on UP, but it seems like these topics are heavily discussed around Charlotte and heavily opinionized.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree on everything except turnout. I think it will be average to below. There is a lot of water cooler type talk about some of these issues, but, as metro points out, very little organized opposition (or support) at a grassroots level which often drives turnout.

The exception to the lack of interest is the transit tax. I voted that the effort to repeal it will fail, but this issue does seem to have generated the most opposition (or support, depending on your point of view). IMHO, the issue seems to have peaked with the petition signature drive to get it on the ballot. Now, with Charlotte's big hitters stepping in to support the tax, I think most people are just going to let this one slide (i.e. vote to not repeal the tax).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the transit tax vote could produce a surprise "yes" result. Though the general momentum seems to be in the direction of keeping the tax, I can imagine the disinterested and uninformed generally opposing taxes; combined with the informed, organized effort to repeal the tax, it might cause the "yes" vote to bump over 50%. I certainly don't think it's going to be a landslide in either direction and I'd honestly be surprised if it were decided by more than a 5% margin. For that reason, I'm uneasy about the confusing nature of the yes/no dynamic on this issue.

I think McCrory and CMS will be landslide winners for the reasons described by metro above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got a feeling that we might be surpised with a repeal of the transit tax. I hear a lot of anti-rhretoric on UP, but outside of that, I've not heard much support for the tax or any tax in general for that matter. Seems like kinda the same feelings that people have had for CMS in the past with their mismanagement. Why should we give CATS more money when they've screwed this up so far seems to be the thinking that I've heard from some. When it comes to advertising, I've only seen 2 commercials for anti-repeal, 2 or 3 billboards, and a handful of yard signs. On the other hand, I've seen at least a hundred pro-repeal yard signs but no commercials or billboards. So who has the advantage?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with all the predictions in the original post. I don't think we will see any upsets. I did not vote for any Republicans. But I would not mind if Edwin Peacock won an At Large City Council seat. More moderate Republicans officials on the local level would be a good thing. One more thing.. I already voted early against repeal but I am sick of endless spam from the pro-train crowd I have been getting on a daily basis. Oy vey enough already :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tax repeal issue will likely be decided by the side who has convinced the most people with misinformation. Those that I talk to who really only watch the news or have only seen parts of the arguments really don't understand the issue at hand at all (on both sides). This is actually somewhat confusing for the average person who doesn't keep up with city and agency dynamics and those that don't really understand much about public projects and funding. Overall I believe the repeal will be based on who sound-bite convinced the most people.

With that, if the public ISN'T well enough informed, I think the repeal will fail because many people who always want to vote down any taxes, bonds, or other city expenditures might vote NO because that is what they are used to voting (if they haven't paid enough attention). Otherwise I think people who actually have an opinion and are planning a vote one way or another will know which button to hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ Frankly I wonder whether the definition of the word "repeal" is all that widely known. I like to give the general public the benefit of the doubt, but the fact of the matter is that many voters have very limited vocabularies. Studies have shown over and over that many people cast "yes" or "no" votes without reading ANY of the text provided on the ballot, and the percentage who only read a word or two (usually scanning for words like "tax") is even larger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They could but it would simply be wrong. It would totaly undermine the point of this vote we had and ignoring what the majority of the population has voted for would simply be inmature and corrupt. They could however create a new tax that's only for the bus system and road expansion, repairs, etc.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ Even in that situation I prefer a large turnout to a small one, where the fringe groups have the loudest voice. Even if some of the increase in voting is due to mobilization by special interests, it only means that the result will more accurately reflect the opinions of the politically-interested population.

If the transit tax gets voted down, it's not the fault of the anti-tax crowd for being active but of the pro-tax crowd for not showing up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The worst thing to have is an apathetic electorate. Regardless of whether one agrees with election results increased participation should be celebrated . I still think the transit tax is not going to get repealed. But the higher turnout today has given me some pause....I would think the numbers represent people who are angry and want to stop future rail construction. The silent majority will think "oh it's not going to get repealed" and may not turn out in large numbers. I hope I am wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The worst thing to have is an apathetic electorate. Regardless of whether one agrees with election results increased participation should be celebrated . I still think the transit tax is not going to get repealed. But the higher turnout today has given me some pause....I would think the numbers represent people who are angry and want to stop future rail construction. The silent majority will think "oh it's not going to get repealed" and may not turn out in large numbers. I hope I am wrong.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.