Jump to content

South Carolina's population growth


CorgiMatt

Recommended Posts

New list of urban areas for 2020 has been releasedDefinitions have changed, resulting in some urban areas (like Greenville) "losing" population.  Some changes:

--The use of housing unit density instead of solely population density. The minimum population threshold to qualify as urban increased from 2,500 to 5,000 or a minimum housing unit threshold of 2,000 housing units.

--The jump distance was reduced from 2.5 miles to 1.5 miles for 2020.  Jump distance is the distance along roads used to connect high-density urban territories surrounded by rural territory. 

SC Urban Areas  (city, population, housing units, area)

Charleston, SC    684,773    305,541    339.1

Columbia, SC    590,407    258,608    367.5

Greenville, SC    387,271    171,025    262.2

Myrtle Beach, SC    298,954    193,144    218.9

Rock Hill, SC    218,443    89,706    145.1

Spartanburg, SC    196,943    82,772    181.0

Mauldin—Simpsonville, SC    159,506    64,676    101.2

Anderson—Clemson, SC    118,369    50,811    95.9

Florence, SC    89,436    40,455    68.0

Bluffton East—Hilton Head Island, SC    71,824    43,742    63.2

Sumter, SC    68,825    30,795    57.7

Edited by westsider28
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


7 minutes ago, westsider28 said:

New list of urban areas for 2020 has been releasedDefinitions have changed, resulting in some urban areas (like Greenville) "losing" population.  Some changes:

--The use of housing unit density instead of solely population density. The minimum population threshold to qualify as urban increased from 2,500 to 5,000 or a minimum housing unit threshold of 2,000 housing units.

--The jump distance was reduced from 2.5 miles to 1.5 miles for 2020.  Jump distance is the distance along roads used to connect high-density urban territories surrounded by rural territory. 

SC Urban Areas  (city, population, housing units, area)

Charleston, SC    684,773    305,541    339.1

Columbia, SC    590,407    258,608    367.5

Greenville, SC    387,271    171,025    262.2

Myrtle Beach, SC    298,954    193,144    218.9

Rock Hill, SC    218,443    89,706    145.1

Spartanburg, SC    196,943    82,772    181.0

Mauldin—Simpsonville, SC    159,506    64,676    101.2

Anderson—Clemson, SC    118,369    50,811    95.9

Florence, SC    89,436    40,455    68.0

Bluffton East—Hilton Head Island, SC    71,824    43,742    63.2

Sumter, SC    68,825    30,795    57.7

I don't understand why Mauldin-Simpsonville are separate from Greenville when they are clearly connected. You can drive down Laurens Rd and not even know you've crossed the line if there weren't signs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, motonenterprises said:

I don't understand why Mauldin-Simpsonville are separate from Greenville when they are clearly connected. You can drive down Laurens Rd and not even know you've crossed the line if there weren't signs.

Keep in mind, this is residential/housing based (not commercial).  There appears to be a pretty large gap in residential density just south of I-85 along Laurens that is probably enough to separate the two.  (There's also a residential gap on Woodruff Road, due to all the commercial).  The Census Bureau should be releasing maps sometime next year, which presumably will show the exact boundaries of each urban area.

I'm a bit surprised that Greer isn't its own urban area, but I assume it's attached to Greenville and/or Spartanburg urban area(s).

Edited by westsider28
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, westsider28 said:

Keep in mind, this is residential/housing based (not commercial).  There appears to be a pretty large gap in residential density just south of I-85 along Laurens that is probably enough to separate the two.  (There's also a residential gap on Woodruff Road, due to all the commercial).  The Census Bureau should be releasing maps sometime next year, which presumably will show the exact boundaries of each urban area.

I'm a bit surprised that Greer isn't its own urban area, but I assume it's attached to Greenville and/or Spartanburg urban area(s).

No. There is no gap between these places. It's pretty much all Greenville. I live in Simpsonville. Do you live in the area? Anyone that does knows there is no gap between these areas. It's contiguous. Greer is also a Greenville burb. It's contiguous from downtown Greenville, through Taylors; and Greer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, motonenterprises said:

No. There is no gap between these places. It's pretty much all Greenville. I live in Simpsonville. Do you live in the area? Anyone that does knows there is no gap between these areas. It's contiguous. Greer is also a Greenville burb. It's contiguous from downtown Greenville, through Taylors; and Greer.

Wow. Chill, my guy.  I'm just the messenger.  Direct your anger toward the Census Bureau.  However, you still seem to be conflating "development" with "residential density".

From the Census definitions of urban areas:  "500 people per square mile [or 200 housing units per square mile] to finish out the delineation as we moved outward through suburban territory to the edge of the urban area."

Here are the 2010 Urban Area maps:  Greenville map     Mauldin-Simpsonville map

The lack of residential density around I-85 causes the two areas to be separate.  Also, the updated residential density standards (and lower jump distance) probably caused Greenville to lose much of the western part of that map, leading to their urban area population decline.  We'll know for sure when the 2020 maps are released next year.  It is an odd scenario, but that happens with any dataset with (somewhat) arbitrary standards.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, westsider28 said:

Wow. Chill, my guy.  I'm just the messenger.  Direct your anger toward the Census Bureau.  However, you still seem to be conflating "development" with "residential density".

From the Census definitions of urban areas:  "500 people per square mile [or 200 housing units per square mile] to finish out the delineation as we moved outward through suburban territory to the edge of the urban area."

Here are the 2010 Urban Area maps:  Greenville map     Mauldin-Simpsonville map

The lack of residential density around I-85 causes the two areas to be separate.  Also, the updated residential density standards (and lower jump distance) probably caused Greenville to lose much of the western part of that map, leading to their urban area population decline.  We'll know for sure when the 2020 maps are released next year.  It is an odd scenario, but that happens with any dataset with (somewhat) arbitrary standards.

 

How do you get emotion from a post? It is what it is. They don't live here either. Lol. The ones of us that do know that it's really one area. We live in Mauldin-Simpsonville for proximity to Greenville. Residential actually does run contiguous across the lines. 2010 is a long time ago. Actually, apparently once they deem an area it's own urban area they don't change it. So even if Greenville City completely engulfs it, that separate urban area will still exist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a very interesting change. It's obvious the change in parameters had a vast effect on the numbers; Greenville has grown tremendously since 2010 yet the UA shrank. Charleston has also grown tremendously since 2010 and it's UA went way up. Charleston's includes portions of other counties as it's UA has more people than it's whole county, and Greenville doesn't even include contiguous areas. It just goes to show that numbers don't really tell the real world story about areas (and one could manipulate the parameters to say just about anything they want). By city pop Charleston is twice as big as Greenville; the UA says almost the same. County populations says Greenville is significantly larger despite being a bit smaller geographically. MSA says Greenville is larger. In reality, they are laid out differently, but very similar in size. My advice, don't get too caught up in the numbers, just decide which area you like the feel of better.

Edited by distortedlogic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, distortedlogic said:

This is a very interesting change. It's obvious the change in parameters had a vast effect on the numbers; Greenville has grown tremendously since 2010 yet the UA shrank. Charleston has also grown tremendously since 2010 and it's UA went way up. Charleston's includes portions of other counties as it's UA has more people than it's whole county, and Greenville doesn't even include contiguous areas. It just goes to show that numbers don't really tell the real world story about areas (and one could manipulate the parameters to say just about anything they want). By city pop Charleston is twice as big as Greenville; the UA says almost the same. County populations says Greenville is significantly larger despite being a bit smaller geographically. MSA says Greenville is larger. In reality, they are laid out differently, but very similar in size. My advice, don't get too caught up in the numbers, just decide which area you like the feel of better.

I agree. Even though they are the kings of census data, they are still human; which means they are flawed too. They are just laid out differently as you said. Most people don't care about these numbers. They do care about the amenities of the place they live in. Greenville doesn't really lack on that and in many cases gets things first.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

So I was taught that the combination or urban areas isn't strictly a data-driven process, it's also partially political. I think the local jurisdictions get a say in it. Greer is included in Greenville's UA (generally the Tyger River is a better boundary between Greenville and Spartanburg than the County Line), and is historically more connected as a 'suburb' - even though Greer was its own place long before it was absorbed into Greenville's sphere. This isn't an uncommon phenomenon. The same situation exists in Charlotte where Concord is IRL seamlessly connected, yet it remains a separate UA. 

My thoughts are that UA population doesn't really mean much aside from understanding population distribution patterns. I wouldn't get too hung up on it. County population, MSA population (which is derived in part from commute data), GDP, employment, etc. are all better metrics. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Spartan said:

So I was taught that the combination or urban areas isn't strictly a data-driven process, it's also partially political. I think the local jurisdictions get a say in it. Greer is included in Greenville's UA (generally the Tyger River is a better boundary between Greenville and Spartanburg than the County Line), and is historically more connected as a 'suburb' - even though Greer was its own place long before it was absorbed into Greenville's sphere. This isn't an uncommon phenomenon. The same situation exists in Charlotte where Concord is IRL seamlessly connected, yet it remains a separate UA. 

My thoughts are that UA population doesn't really mean much aside from understanding population distribution patterns. I wouldn't get too hung up on it. County population, MSA population (which is derived in part from commute data), GDP, employment, etc. are all better metrics. 

This is the debate I got into with Charleston Data on another forum. He wanted to ignore MSA and County and only use UA for his 'bragging rights'. I told him you can't just ignore MSA and County.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. I mean, UA isn't completely irrelevant -but the fact that you have what, 5-7 of them just in the Upstate just emphasizes how spread out we are.

And if you want to get really nitpicky, you coudl argue the 2k/sq mi density is hogwash too. Its an arbitrary number that basically gets large areas of subdivisions. I would argue if it isn't dense enough to require sewer service then it doesn't count as "urban" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Percent Change in County Population: July 1, 2021, to July 1, 2022

 

Well here are the numbers. No Big surprises but some pretty big numbers for some of the counties.

Horry                  17,090

Greenville        13,429

Spartanburg    10,425

Berkley                 8,246

York                        4,993

Charleston          4, 876

Richland                4,434

Beaufort                4,364

Lexington              4,315

Lancaster              4,055

Aiken                       2,887

Anderson              2,729

Dorchester          2,625

 

Every other county was under 2,000. I am very concerned about the upstate growth, that is too many for one year IMO. Not sustainable.

Here are the estimate totals.       

 

Greenville              547,950  

Richland                 421,566

Charleston           419,279

Horry                       383,101

Spatanburg          345,831

Lexington              304,797

York                         294,248

Berkley                 245,117

Anderson            209,581

 

Edited by distortedlogic
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, vicupstate said:

^^  It is the equivalent of every person in Bamberg County moving to Greenville County in one year.

Can you post a link? I can never find what I am looking for on the Census website.  Curious to see what counties lost population.

https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/popest/2020s-counties-total.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, distortedlogic said:

Thanks!

Basically, we have 13 counties that are growing and 33 that are losing or flat. 

Those eleven are Anderson, Beaufort, Berkeley, Charleston, Dorchester, Greenville,  Horry, Jasper, Lancaster, Lexington, Richland, Spartanburg, York.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Article from the P&C on this: 

https://www.postandcourier.com/news/south-carolina-saw-rapid-population-growth-during-pandemic-census-data-shows/article_ec62b9a0-cf06-11ed-9858-bff04ba46100.html

Nick Sabatine, CEO of the Greater Greenville Association of Realtors, said the region has seen a sustained period of growth.

“The market in Greenville has never really slowed down,” he said.

Edited by gman430
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

It's insane. There are subdivisions popping up in places I never would have expected to see them in Spartanburg County. The eastern portion of the county, particularly south of 85 has been more or less dormant for ~30 years and is now exploding, and nary a zoning ordinance or growth plan to be seen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Article from The State showing estimates that 219,707 people moved into the state from other states, in addition to over 22k moving in from other countries last year in 2022! Not sure how many moved out but that is a lot of influx. Article shows the top ten states people moved from:

  1. North Carolina: 36,324
  2. Georgia: 19,121
  3. New York: 15,537
  4. California: 15,035
  5. Florida: 14,769
  6. Virginia: 11,446
  7. Pennsylvania: 9,337
  8. Texas: 8,811
  9. New Jersey: 7,926
  10. Maryland: 7,891

Article:

https://www.thestate.com/news/state/south-carolina/article280772875.html

Census release:

https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/geographic-mobility/state-to-state-migration.html

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.